[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/9] drm/i915: s/mappable_end/mappable_size/

[Chris Wilson]

Quoting Matthew Auld (2017-11-24 21:29:26)
> In a later patch we introduce 'struct resource mappable', which means we
> will have both mappable.end and mappable_end, both meaning different
> things. Therefore to avoid any confusion prefer mappable_size for
> mappable_end, since it is effectively the size of the resource.

Hmm, I still want to keep mappable_end.

Would ggtt->bar work better for the struct resource of the physical
address (or ggtt->gsm/gam whatever the acronym is)?
-Chris