[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 2/5] drm/i915/guc : Removing i915_modparams.enable_guc_loading module
Sagar Arun Kamble
sagar.a.kamble at intel.com
Wed Oct 4 06:45:13 UTC 2017
Subject is missing "parameter" in the end. Either keep module parameter
or i915_modparams.
On 10/4/2017 4:26 AM, Sujaritha Sundaresan wrote:
> We currently have two module parameters that control GuC: "enable_guc_loading" and "enable_guc_submission".
> Whenever we need i915_modparams.enable_guc_submission=1, we also need enable_guc_loading=1.
> We also need enable_guc_loading=1 when we want to verify the HuC,
> which is every time we have a HuC (but all platforms with HuC have a GuC and viceversa).
>
> v2: Clarifying the commit message (Anusha)
>
> v3: Unify seq_puts messages, Re-factoring code as per review (Michal)
>
> v4: Rebase
>
> v5: Separating message unification into a separate patch
>
> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko at intel.com>
> Cc: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa at intel.com>
> Cc: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo at intel.com>
> Cc: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sujaritha Sundaresan <sujaritha.sundaresan at intel.com>
Need to change the order of the tag to comply with new convention.
Applies to all patches.
should be as below as per chronology
S-o-b:
Cc:
R-b:
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 11 +++++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 9 ++++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c | 5 ----
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.h | 1 -
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c | 7 +++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_huc.c | 4 ++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++----------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c | 4 +--
> 12 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> index 53e40dd..4fde4b2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> @@ -2336,8 +2336,10 @@ static int i915_huc_load_status_info(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = node_to_i915(m->private);
> struct intel_uc_fw *huc_fw = &dev_priv->huc.fw;
>
> - if (!HAS_HUC_UCODE(dev_priv))
> + if (!HAS_GUC(dev_priv)){
> + seq_puts(m, "not supported\n");
> return 0;
> + }
>
> seq_puts(m, "HuC firmware status:\n");
> seq_printf(m, "\tpath: %s\n", huc_fw->path);
> @@ -2369,8 +2371,11 @@ static int i915_guc_load_status_info(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
> struct intel_uc_fw *guc_fw = &dev_priv->guc.fw;
> u32 tmp, i;
>
> - if (!HAS_GUC_UCODE(dev_priv))
> + if (!HAS_GUC(dev_priv)){
> + seq_puts(m, "not supported\n");
> return 0;
> +
> + }
>
> seq_printf(m, "GuC firmware status:\n");
> seq_printf(m, "\tpath: %s\n",
> @@ -2465,7 +2470,7 @@ static bool check_guc_submission(struct seq_file *m)
>
> if (!guc->execbuf_client) {
> seq_printf(m, "GuC submission %s\n",
> - HAS_GUC_SCHED(dev_priv) ?
> + HAS_GUC(dev_priv) ?
> "disabled" :
> "not supported");
> return false;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index 61a4be9..6479b72 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -3141,9 +3141,12 @@ static inline unsigned int i915_sg_segment_size(void)
> */
> #define HAS_GUC(dev_priv) ((dev_priv)->info.has_guc)
> #define HAS_GUC_CT(dev_priv) ((dev_priv)->info.has_guc_ct)
> -#define HAS_GUC_UCODE(dev_priv) (HAS_GUC(dev_priv))
> -#define HAS_GUC_SCHED(dev_priv) (HAS_GUC(dev_priv))
> -#define HAS_HUC_UCODE(dev_priv) (HAS_GUC(dev_priv))
> +#define HAS_GUC_UCODE(dev_priv) ((dev_priv)->guc.fw.path != NULL)
> +#define HAS_HUC_UCODE(dev_priv) ((dev_priv)->guc.fw.path != NULL)
Is this typo? Should be (dev_priv)->huc.fw.path
> +
> +#define NEEDS_GUC_LOADING(dev_priv) \
> + (HAS_GUC(dev_priv) && \
> + (i915_modparams.enable_guc_submission || HAS_HUC_UCODE(dev_priv)))
>
> #define HAS_RESOURCE_STREAMER(dev_priv) ((dev_priv)->info.has_resource_streamer)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c
> index 921ee36..0890341 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c
> @@ -314,7 +314,7 @@ static u32 default_desc_template(const struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> * present or not in use we still need a small bias as ring wraparound
> * at offset 0 sometimes hangs. No idea why.
> */
> - if (HAS_GUC(dev_priv) && i915_modparams.enable_guc_loading)
> + if (NEEDS_GUC_LOADING(dev_priv))
> ctx->ggtt_offset_bias = GUC_WOPCM_TOP;
> else
> ctx->ggtt_offset_bias = I915_GTT_PAGE_SIZE;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
> index 64d7852..a32935a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
> @@ -3292,7 +3292,7 @@ int i915_ggtt_probe_hw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> * currently don't have any bits spare to pass in this upper
> * restriction!
> */
> - if (HAS_GUC(dev_priv) && i915_modparams.enable_guc_loading) {
> + if (NEEDS_GUC_LOADING(dev_priv)) {
> ggtt->base.total = min_t(u64, ggtt->base.total, GUC_GGTT_TOP);
> ggtt->mappable_end = min(ggtt->mappable_end, ggtt->base.total);
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> index 6a07ef3..60cdf0d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> @@ -3956,7 +3956,7 @@ void intel_irq_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> for (i = 0; i < MAX_L3_SLICES; ++i)
> dev_priv->l3_parity.remap_info[i] = NULL;
>
> - if (HAS_GUC_SCHED(dev_priv))
> + if (NEEDS_GUC_LOADING(dev_priv))
> dev_priv->pm_guc_events = GEN9_GUC_TO_HOST_INT_EVENT;
>
> /* Let's track the enabled rps events */
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c
> index ec65341..30344e1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c
> @@ -63,7 +63,6 @@ struct i915_params i915_modparams __read_mostly = {
> .verbose_state_checks = 1,
> .nuclear_pageflip = 0,
> .edp_vswing = 0,
> - .enable_guc_loading = 0,
> .enable_guc_submission = 0,
> .guc_log_level = -1,
> .guc_firmware_path = NULL,
> @@ -201,10 +200,6 @@ struct i915_params i915_modparams __read_mostly = {
> "(0=use value from vbt [default], 1=low power swing(200mV),"
> "2=default swing(400mV))");
>
> -i915_param_named_unsafe(enable_guc_loading, int, 0400,
> - "Enable GuC firmware loading "
> - "(-1=auto, 0=never [default], 1=if available, 2=required)");
> -
> i915_param_named_unsafe(enable_guc_submission, int, 0400,
> "Enable GuC submission "
> "(-1=auto, 0=never [default], 1=if available, 2=required)");
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.h
> index a2cbb47..b26df06 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.h
> @@ -44,7 +44,6 @@
> func(int, disable_power_well); \
> func(int, enable_ips); \
> func(int, invert_brightness); \
> - func(int, enable_guc_loading); \
> func(int, enable_guc_submission); \
> func(int, guc_log_level); \
> func(char *, guc_firmware_path); \
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c
> index c9e25be..4210680 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c
> @@ -382,7 +382,7 @@ int intel_guc_init_hw(struct intel_guc *guc)
> *
> * Return: zero when we know firmware, non-zero in other case
Need to update the comment.
> */
> -int intel_guc_select_fw(struct intel_guc *guc)
> +void intel_guc_select_fw(struct intel_guc *guc)
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = guc_to_i915(guc);
>
> @@ -412,8 +412,9 @@ int intel_guc_select_fw(struct intel_guc *guc)
> guc->fw.major_ver_wanted = GLK_FW_MAJOR;
> guc->fw.minor_ver_wanted = GLK_FW_MINOR;
> } else {
> - DRM_ERROR("No GuC firmware known for platform with GuC!\n");
> - return -ENOENT;
> + if(HAS_GUC(dev_priv))
> + DRM_ERROR("NO GUC FW konown for a platform with GuC!\n");
> + return;
> }
>
> return 0;
returning value is not correct
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_huc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_huc.c
> index 6e1779b..ee9e786 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_huc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_huc.c
> @@ -176,7 +176,9 @@ void intel_huc_select_fw(struct intel_huc *huc)
> huc->fw.major_ver_wanted = GLK_HUC_FW_MAJOR;
> huc->fw.minor_ver_wanted = GLK_HUC_FW_MINOR;
> } else {
> - DRM_ERROR("No HuC firmware known for platform with HuC!\n");
> + /* For now, everything with a GuC also has a HuC */
> + if (HAS_GUC(dev_priv))
> + DRM_ERROR("No HuC FW known for a platform with HuC!\n");
> return;
> }
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c
> index 9018540..4290b35 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c
> @@ -63,35 +63,31 @@ static int __intel_uc_reset_hw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> void intel_uc_sanitize_options(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> {
> if (!HAS_GUC(dev_priv)) {
> - if (i915_modparams.enable_guc_loading > 0 ||
> - i915_modparams.enable_guc_submission > 0)
> + if (i915_modparams.enable_guc_submission > 0)
> DRM_INFO("Ignoring GuC options, no hardware\n");
>
> - i915_modparams.enable_guc_loading = 0;
> i915_modparams.enable_guc_submission = 0;
> return;
> }
>
> - /* A negative value means "use platform default" */
> - if (i915_modparams.enable_guc_loading < 0)
> - i915_modparams.enable_guc_loading = HAS_GUC_UCODE(dev_priv);
>
> /* Verify firmware version */
> - if (i915_modparams.enable_guc_loading) {
> - if (HAS_HUC_UCODE(dev_priv))
> - intel_huc_select_fw(&dev_priv->huc);
> -
> - if (intel_guc_select_fw(&dev_priv->guc))
> - i915_modparams.enable_guc_loading = 0;
> + if (!HAS_GUC(dev_priv)){
> + if (i915_modparams.enable_guc_submission > 0){
> + DRM_INFO("Ignoring GuC submission enable enable, no FW\n");
> + i915_modparams.enable_guc_submission = 0;
> + return;
> + }
> }
This is same !HAS_GUC check as the one at the beginning of the function.
>
> /* Can't enable guc submission without guc loaded */
Remove this comment.
> - if (!i915_modparams.enable_guc_loading)
> + if (!i915_modparams.enable_guc_submission < 0)
This is incorrect. Add ( braces to specify correct condition. Also
missing { } till return.
> i915_modparams.enable_guc_submission = 0;
> + return;
>
> /* A negative value means "use platform default" */
> if (i915_modparams.enable_guc_submission < 0)
> - i915_modparams.enable_guc_submission = HAS_GUC_SCHED(dev_priv);
> + i915_modparams.enable_guc_submission = 1;
This is wrong. This should be HAS_GUC.
> }
>
> static void gen8_guc_raise_irq(struct intel_guc *guc)
> @@ -106,6 +102,8 @@ void intel_uc_init_early(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> struct intel_guc *guc = &dev_priv->guc;
>
> intel_guc_ct_init_early(&guc->ct);
> + intel_guc_select_fw(&dev_priv->guc);
> + intel_huc_select_fw(&dev_priv->huc);
Need to rebase these w.r.t Michal's latest GuC code reorg series -
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/31340/
>
> mutex_init(&guc->send_mutex);
> guc->send = intel_guc_send_nop;
> @@ -258,6 +256,8 @@ void intel_uc_init_fw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>
> void intel_uc_fini_fw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> {
> + if (!HAS_GUC(dev_priv))
> + return;
> __intel_uc_fw_fini(&dev_priv->guc.fw);
> __intel_uc_fw_fini(&dev_priv->huc.fw);
> }
> @@ -333,7 +333,7 @@ int intel_uc_init_hw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> struct intel_guc *guc = &dev_priv->guc;
> int ret, attempts;
>
> - if (!i915_modparams.enable_guc_loading)
> + if (!NEEDS_GUC_LOADING(dev_priv))
> return 0;
>
> guc_disable_communication(guc);
> @@ -423,19 +423,20 @@ int intel_uc_init_hw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> i915_ggtt_disable_guc(dev_priv);
>
> DRM_ERROR("GuC init failed\n");
> - if (i915_modparams.enable_guc_loading > 1 ||
> - i915_modparams.enable_guc_submission > 1)
> + if (i915_modparams.enable_guc_submission > 1){
> + DRM_NOTE("GuC is required, so marking the GPU as wedged\n");
> ret = -EIO;
> - else
> - ret = 0;
> +
> + }
>
> - if (i915_modparams.enable_guc_submission) {
> - i915_modparams.enable_guc_submission = 0;
> - DRM_NOTE("Falling back from GuC submission to execlist mode\n");
> + else if (i915_modparams.enable_guc_submission == 1){
> + DRM_NOTE("Falling back from GuC submission to execlist mode\n");
> + i915_modparams.enable_guc_submission = 0;
> + ret = 0;
> }
>
> - i915_modparams.enable_guc_loading = 0;
> - DRM_NOTE("GuC firmware loading disabled\n");
> + else
> + ret = 0;
>
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -444,7 +445,7 @@ void intel_uc_fini_hw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> {
> guc_free_load_err_log(&dev_priv->guc);
>
> - if (!i915_modparams.enable_guc_loading)
> + if (!NEEDS_GUC_LOADING(dev_priv))
> return;
>
> if (i915_modparams.enable_guc_submission)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h
> index 7703c9a..58d787e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h
> @@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ static inline void intel_guc_notify(struct intel_guc *guc)
> }
>
> /* intel_guc_loader.c */
> -int intel_guc_select_fw(struct intel_guc *guc);
> +void intel_guc_select_fw(struct intel_guc *guc);
> int intel_guc_init_hw(struct intel_guc *guc);
> int intel_guc_suspend(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> int intel_guc_resume(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> index b3c3f94..0164f41 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> @@ -1786,12 +1786,10 @@ int intel_guc_reset(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> {
> int ret;
>
> - if (!HAS_GUC(dev_priv))
> - return -EINVAL;
> + GEM_BUG_ON(!HAS_GUC(dev_priv));
>
> intel_uncore_forcewake_get(dev_priv, FORCEWAKE_ALL);
> ret = gen6_hw_domain_reset(dev_priv, GEN9_GRDOM_GUC);
> - intel_uncore_forcewake_put(dev_priv, FORCEWAKE_ALL);
>
> return ret;
> }
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list