[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: warning for series starting with [CI,1/5] igt/gem_workarounds: Read the workaround registers from the active context
Chris Wilson
chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Wed Oct 4 11:06:34 UTC 2017
Quoting Arkadiusz Hiler (2017-10-04 11:57:20)
> On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 08:46:24AM +0000, Patchwork wrote:
> > == Series Details ==
> >
> > Series: series starting with [CI,1/5] igt/gem_workarounds: Read the workaround registers from the active context
> > URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/31325/
> > State : warning
> >
> > == Summary ==
> >
> > Test kms_cursor_legacy:
> > Subgroup pipe-B-torture-bo:
> > incomplete -> PASS (shard-hsw)
> > Test gem_workarounds:
> > Subgroup basic-read:
> > pass -> SKIP (shard-hsw)
> > Subgroup reset:
> > pass -> SKIP (shard-hsw)
> > Subgroup suspend-resume:
> > pass -> SKIP (shard-hsw)
> > Test kms_addfb_basic:
> > Subgroup bad-pitch-0:
> > dmesg-warn -> PASS (shard-hsw)
> > Test gem_eio:
> > Subgroup in-flight-contexts:
> > pass -> DMESG-WARN (shard-hsw) fdo#102886 +2
> > Test perf:
> > Subgroup blocking:
> > pass -> FAIL (shard-hsw) fdo#102252
>
> So I forced the run so we can admire the results for the new tests here:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_289/shards-all.html
The RING_NONPRIV we've already raised and have proposed patches for.
MMCD_MISC_CTRL is new. Anyone want to lookup whether MMCD_MISC_CTRL
(0x4ddc) is part of the context image and deserved the WA_SET_BIT?
-Chris
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list