[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: warning for series starting with [CI,1/5] igt/gem_workarounds: Read the workaround registers from the active context

Chris Wilson chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Wed Oct 4 11:06:34 UTC 2017


Quoting Arkadiusz Hiler (2017-10-04 11:57:20)
> On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 08:46:24AM +0000, Patchwork wrote:
> > == Series Details ==
> > 
> > Series: series starting with [CI,1/5] igt/gem_workarounds: Read the workaround registers from the active context
> > URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/31325/
> > State : warning
> > 
> > == Summary ==
> > 
> > Test kms_cursor_legacy:
> >         Subgroup pipe-B-torture-bo:
> >                 incomplete -> PASS       (shard-hsw)
> > Test gem_workarounds:
> >         Subgroup basic-read:
> >                 pass       -> SKIP       (shard-hsw)
> >         Subgroup reset:
> >                 pass       -> SKIP       (shard-hsw)
> >         Subgroup suspend-resume:
> >                 pass       -> SKIP       (shard-hsw)
> > Test kms_addfb_basic:
> >         Subgroup bad-pitch-0:
> >                 dmesg-warn -> PASS       (shard-hsw)
> > Test gem_eio:
> >         Subgroup in-flight-contexts:
> >                 pass       -> DMESG-WARN (shard-hsw) fdo#102886 +2
> > Test perf:
> >         Subgroup blocking:
> >                 pass       -> FAIL       (shard-hsw) fdo#102252
> 
> So I forced the run so we can admire the results for the new tests here:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_289/shards-all.html

The RING_NONPRIV we've already raised and have proposed patches for.
MMCD_MISC_CTRL is new. Anyone want to lookup whether MMCD_MISC_CTRL
(0x4ddc) is part of the context image and deserved the WA_SET_BIT?
-Chris


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list