[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 2/5] drm/i915/guc : Removing i915_modparams.enable_guc_loading module

Michal Wajdeczko michal.wajdeczko at intel.com
Wed Oct 4 12:00:04 UTC 2017


On Wed, 04 Oct 2017 00:56:18 +0200, Sujaritha Sundaresan  
<sujaritha.sundaresan at intel.com> wrote:

> We currently have two module parameters that control GuC:  
> "enable_guc_loading" and "enable_guc_submission".
> Whenever we need i915_modparams.enable_guc_submission=1, we also need  
> enable_guc_loading=1.
> We also need enable_guc_loading=1 when we want to verify the HuC,
> which is every time we have a HuC (but all platforms with HuC have a GuC  
> and viceversa).
>
> v2: Clarifying the commit message (Anusha)
>
> v3: Unify seq_puts messages, Re-factoring code as per review (Michal)
>
> v4: Rebase
>
> v5: Separating message unification into a separate patch
>
> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko at intel.com>
> Cc: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa at intel.com>
> Cc: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo at intel.com>
> Cc: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sujaritha Sundaresan <sujaritha.sundaresan at intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c     | 11 +++++--
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h         |  9 ++++--
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c |  2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c     |  2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c         |  2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c      |  5 ----
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.h      |  1 -
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c |  7 +++--
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_huc.c        |  4 ++-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c         | 51  
> +++++++++++++++++----------------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h         |  2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c     |  4 +--
>  12 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c  
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> index 53e40dd..4fde4b2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> @@ -2336,8 +2336,10 @@ static int i915_huc_load_status_info(struct  
> seq_file *m, void *data)
>  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = node_to_i915(m->private);
>  	struct intel_uc_fw *huc_fw = &dev_priv->huc.fw;
> -	if (!HAS_HUC_UCODE(dev_priv))
> +	if (!HAS_GUC(dev_priv)){
> +		seq_puts(m, "not supported\n");

This line should be added in patch 1/5

>  		return 0;
> +	}
> 	seq_puts(m, "HuC firmware status:\n");
>  	seq_printf(m, "\tpath: %s\n", huc_fw->path);
> @@ -2369,8 +2371,11 @@ static int i915_guc_load_status_info(struct  
> seq_file *m, void *data)
>  	struct intel_uc_fw *guc_fw = &dev_priv->guc.fw;
>  	u32 tmp, i;
> -	if (!HAS_GUC_UCODE(dev_priv))
> +	if (!HAS_GUC(dev_priv)){
> +		seq_puts(m, "not supported\n");

Same here.

>  		return 0;
> +		
> +	}
> 	seq_printf(m, "GuC firmware status:\n");
>  	seq_printf(m, "\tpath: %s\n",
> @@ -2465,7 +2470,7 @@ static bool check_guc_submission(struct seq_file  
> *m)
> 	if (!guc->execbuf_client) {
>  		seq_printf(m, "GuC submission %s\n",
> -			   HAS_GUC_SCHED(dev_priv) ?
> +			   HAS_GUC(dev_priv) ?
>  			   "disabled" :
>  			   "not supported");
>  		return false;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h  
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index 61a4be9..6479b72 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -3141,9 +3141,12 @@ static inline unsigned int  
> i915_sg_segment_size(void)
>   */
>  #define HAS_GUC(dev_priv)	((dev_priv)->info.has_guc)
>  #define HAS_GUC_CT(dev_priv)	((dev_priv)->info.has_guc_ct)
> -#define HAS_GUC_UCODE(dev_priv)	(HAS_GUC(dev_priv))
> -#define HAS_GUC_SCHED(dev_priv)	(HAS_GUC(dev_priv))
> -#define HAS_HUC_UCODE(dev_priv)	(HAS_GUC(dev_priv))
> +#define HAS_GUC_UCODE(dev_priv)	((dev_priv)->guc.fw.path != NULL)
> +#define HAS_HUC_UCODE(dev_priv)	((dev_priv)->guc.fw.path != NULL)
                                                      ^^^
huc ?

> +
> +#define NEEDS_GUC_LOADING(dev_priv) \
> +	(HAS_GUC(dev_priv) && \
> +	(i915_modparams.enable_guc_submission || HAS_HUC_UCODE(dev_priv)))
> #define HAS_RESOURCE_STREAMER(dev_priv)  
> ((dev_priv)->info.has_resource_streamer)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c  
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c
> index 921ee36..0890341 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c
> @@ -314,7 +314,7 @@ static u32 default_desc_template(const struct  
> drm_i915_private *i915,
>  	 * present or not in use we still need a small bias as ring wraparound
>  	 * at offset 0 sometimes hangs. No idea why.
>  	 */
> -	if (HAS_GUC(dev_priv) && i915_modparams.enable_guc_loading)
> +	if (NEEDS_GUC_LOADING(dev_priv))
>  		ctx->ggtt_offset_bias = GUC_WOPCM_TOP;
>  	else
>  		ctx->ggtt_offset_bias = I915_GTT_PAGE_SIZE;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c  
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
> index 64d7852..a32935a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
> @@ -3292,7 +3292,7 @@ int i915_ggtt_probe_hw(struct drm_i915_private  
> *dev_priv)
>  	 * currently don't have any bits spare to pass in this upper
>  	 * restriction!
>  	 */
> -	if (HAS_GUC(dev_priv) && i915_modparams.enable_guc_loading) {
> +	if (NEEDS_GUC_LOADING(dev_priv)) {
>  		ggtt->base.total = min_t(u64, ggtt->base.total, GUC_GGTT_TOP);
>  		ggtt->mappable_end = min(ggtt->mappable_end, ggtt->base.total);
>  	}
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c  
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> index 6a07ef3..60cdf0d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> @@ -3956,7 +3956,7 @@ void intel_irq_init(struct drm_i915_private  
> *dev_priv)
>  	for (i = 0; i < MAX_L3_SLICES; ++i)
>  		dev_priv->l3_parity.remap_info[i] = NULL;
> -	if (HAS_GUC_SCHED(dev_priv))
> +	if (NEEDS_GUC_LOADING(dev_priv))
>  		dev_priv->pm_guc_events = GEN9_GUC_TO_HOST_INT_EVENT;
> 	/* Let's track the enabled rps events */
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c  
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c
> index ec65341..30344e1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c
> @@ -63,7 +63,6 @@ struct i915_params i915_modparams __read_mostly = {
>  	.verbose_state_checks = 1,
>  	.nuclear_pageflip = 0,
>  	.edp_vswing = 0,
> -	.enable_guc_loading = 0,

Needs rebase

>  	.enable_guc_submission = 0,
>  	.guc_log_level = -1,
>  	.guc_firmware_path = NULL,
> @@ -201,10 +200,6 @@ struct i915_params i915_modparams __read_mostly = {
>  	"(0=use value from vbt [default], 1=low power swing(200mV),"
>  	"2=default swing(400mV))");
> -i915_param_named_unsafe(enable_guc_loading, int, 0400,
> -	"Enable GuC firmware loading "
> -	"(-1=auto, 0=never [default], 1=if available, 2=required)");
> -
>  i915_param_named_unsafe(enable_guc_submission, int, 0400,
>  	"Enable GuC submission "
>  	"(-1=auto, 0=never [default], 1=if available, 2=required)");
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.h  
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.h
> index a2cbb47..b26df06 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.h
> @@ -44,7 +44,6 @@
>  	func(int, disable_power_well); \
>  	func(int, enable_ips); \
>  	func(int, invert_brightness); \
> -	func(int, enable_guc_loading); \

Needs rebase

>  	func(int, enable_guc_submission); \
>  	func(int, guc_log_level); \
>  	func(char *, guc_firmware_path); \
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c  
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c
> index c9e25be..4210680 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c
> @@ -382,7 +382,7 @@ int intel_guc_init_hw(struct intel_guc *guc)
>   *
>   * Return: zero when we know firmware, non-zero in other case
>   */
> -int intel_guc_select_fw(struct intel_guc *guc)
> +void intel_guc_select_fw(struct intel_guc *guc)
>  {
>  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = guc_to_i915(guc);
> @@ -412,8 +412,9 @@ int intel_guc_select_fw(struct intel_guc *guc)
>  		guc->fw.major_ver_wanted = GLK_FW_MAJOR;
>  		guc->fw.minor_ver_wanted = GLK_FW_MINOR;
>  	} else {
> -		DRM_ERROR("No GuC firmware known for platform with GuC!\n");
> -		return -ENOENT;
> +		if(HAS_GUC(dev_priv))
> +			DRM_ERROR("NO GUC FW konown for a platform with GuC!\n");
> +		return;
>  	}
> 	return 0;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_huc.c  
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_huc.c
> index 6e1779b..ee9e786 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_huc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_huc.c
> @@ -176,7 +176,9 @@ void intel_huc_select_fw(struct intel_huc *huc)
>  		huc->fw.major_ver_wanted = GLK_HUC_FW_MAJOR;
>  		huc->fw.minor_ver_wanted = GLK_HUC_FW_MINOR;
>  	} else {
> -		DRM_ERROR("No HuC firmware known for platform with HuC!\n");
> +		/* For now, everything with a GuC also has a HuC */

Hmm, maybe above shall be added to
#define HAS_HUC(dev_priv) HAS_GUC(dev_priv)

> +		if (HAS_GUC(dev_priv))

And then use here HAS_HUC() ?

> +			DRM_ERROR("No HuC FW known for a platform with HuC!\n");
>  		return;
>  	}
>  }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c  
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c
> index 9018540..4290b35 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c
> @@ -63,35 +63,31 @@ static int __intel_uc_reset_hw(struct  
> drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  void intel_uc_sanitize_options(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  {
>  	if (!HAS_GUC(dev_priv)) {
> -		if (i915_modparams.enable_guc_loading > 0 ||
> -		    i915_modparams.enable_guc_submission > 0)
> +		if (i915_modparams.enable_guc_submission > 0)
>  			DRM_INFO("Ignoring GuC options, no hardware\n");
> -		i915_modparams.enable_guc_loading = 0;
>  		i915_modparams.enable_guc_submission = 0;
>  		return;
>  	}
> -	/* A negative value means "use platform default" */
> -	if (i915_modparams.enable_guc_loading < 0)
> -		i915_modparams.enable_guc_loading = HAS_GUC_UCODE(dev_priv);
> 	/* Verify firmware version */
> -	if (i915_modparams.enable_guc_loading) {
> -		if (HAS_HUC_UCODE(dev_priv))
> -			intel_huc_select_fw(&dev_priv->huc);
> -
> -		if (intel_guc_select_fw(&dev_priv->guc))
> -			i915_modparams.enable_guc_loading = 0;
> +	if (!HAS_GUC(dev_priv)){

Unreachable code

> +		if (i915_modparams.enable_guc_submission > 0){
> +			DRM_INFO("Ignoring GuC submission enable enable, no FW\n");
> +			i915_modparams.enable_guc_submission = 0;
> +			return;
> +		}
>  	}
> 	/* Can't enable guc submission without guc loaded */
> -	if (!i915_modparams.enable_guc_loading)
> +	if (!i915_modparams.enable_guc_submission < 0)
>  		i915_modparams.enable_guc_submission = 0;
> +	return;
> 	/* A negative value means "use platform default" */
>  	if (i915_modparams.enable_guc_submission < 0)
> -		i915_modparams.enable_guc_submission = HAS_GUC_SCHED(dev_priv);
> +		i915_modparams.enable_guc_submission = 1;
>  }
> static void gen8_guc_raise_irq(struct intel_guc *guc)
> @@ -106,6 +102,8 @@ void intel_uc_init_early(struct drm_i915_private  
> *dev_priv)
>  	struct intel_guc *guc = &dev_priv->guc;
> 	intel_guc_ct_init_early(&guc->ct);

Maybe following lines shall be guarded with HAS_GUC/HAS_HUC
like you did in fini_fw ?

> +	intel_guc_select_fw(&dev_priv->guc);
> +	intel_huc_select_fw(&dev_priv->huc);

Btw, note that we already has "guc" local variable ...

> 	mutex_init(&guc->send_mutex);
>  	guc->send = intel_guc_send_nop;
> @@ -258,6 +256,8 @@ void intel_uc_init_fw(struct drm_i915_private  
> *dev_priv)
> void intel_uc_fini_fw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  {
> +	if (!HAS_GUC(dev_priv))
> +		return;
>  	__intel_uc_fw_fini(&dev_priv->guc.fw);
>  	__intel_uc_fw_fini(&dev_priv->huc.fw);
>  }
> @@ -333,7 +333,7 @@ int intel_uc_init_hw(struct drm_i915_private  
> *dev_priv)
>  	struct intel_guc *guc = &dev_priv->guc;
>  	int ret, attempts;
> -	if (!i915_modparams.enable_guc_loading)
> +	if (!NEEDS_GUC_LOADING(dev_priv))
>  		return 0;
> 	guc_disable_communication(guc);
> @@ -423,19 +423,20 @@ int intel_uc_init_hw(struct drm_i915_private  
> *dev_priv)
>  	i915_ggtt_disable_guc(dev_priv);
> 	DRM_ERROR("GuC init failed\n");
> -	if (i915_modparams.enable_guc_loading > 1 ||
> -	    i915_modparams.enable_guc_submission > 1)
> +	if (i915_modparams.enable_guc_submission > 1){
> +		DRM_NOTE("GuC is required, so marking the GPU as wedged\n");
>  		ret = -EIO;
> -	else
> -		ret = 0;
> +	
> +	}
> -	if (i915_modparams.enable_guc_submission) {
> -		i915_modparams.enable_guc_submission = 0;
> -		DRM_NOTE("Falling back from GuC submission to execlist mode\n");
> +	else if (i915_modparams.enable_guc_submission == 1){
> +			DRM_NOTE("Falling back from GuC submission to execlist mode\n");
> +			i915_modparams.enable_guc_submission = 0;
> +			ret = 0;
>  	}
> -	i915_modparams.enable_guc_loading = 0;
> -	DRM_NOTE("GuC firmware loading disabled\n");
> +	else
> +		ret = 0;	
> 	return ret;
>  }
> @@ -444,7 +445,7 @@ void intel_uc_fini_hw(struct drm_i915_private  
> *dev_priv)
>  {
>  	guc_free_load_err_log(&dev_priv->guc);
> -	if (!i915_modparams.enable_guc_loading)
> +	if (!NEEDS_GUC_LOADING(dev_priv))
>  		return;
> 	if (i915_modparams.enable_guc_submission)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h  
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h
> index 7703c9a..58d787e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h
> @@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ static inline void intel_guc_notify(struct intel_guc  
> *guc)
>  }
> /* intel_guc_loader.c */
> -int intel_guc_select_fw(struct intel_guc *guc);
> +void intel_guc_select_fw(struct intel_guc *guc);
>  int intel_guc_init_hw(struct intel_guc *guc);
>  int intel_guc_suspend(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>  int intel_guc_resume(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c  
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> index b3c3f94..0164f41 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> @@ -1786,12 +1786,10 @@ int intel_guc_reset(struct drm_i915_private  
> *dev_priv)
>  {
>  	int ret;
> -	if (!HAS_GUC(dev_priv))
> -		return -EINVAL;
> +	GEM_BUG_ON(!HAS_GUC(dev_priv));
> 	intel_uncore_forcewake_get(dev_priv, FORCEWAKE_ALL);
>  	ret = gen6_hw_domain_reset(dev_priv, GEN9_GRDOM_GUC);
> -	intel_uncore_forcewake_put(dev_priv, FORCEWAKE_ALL);
> 	return ret;
>  }

btw, beware of https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/31340/

Michal


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list