[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Order two completing nop_submit_request

Chris Wilson chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Fri Oct 6 11:53:57 UTC 2017


Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2017-10-06 12:42:34)
> 
> On 06/10/2017 12:22, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > If two nop's (requests in-flight following a wedged device) complete at
> > the same time, the global_seqno value written to the HWSP is undefined
> > as the two threads are not serialized.
> > 
> > Fixes: ce1135c7de64 ("drm/i915: Complete requests in nop_submit_request")
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
> > ---
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 5 ++++-
> >   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> > index ab8c6946fea4..2779bcaff82e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> > @@ -3016,8 +3016,11 @@ static void nop_submit_request(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request)
> >   {
> >       GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_terminally_wedged(&request->i915->gpu_error));
> >       dma_fence_set_error(&request->fence, -EIO);
> > -     i915_gem_request_submit(request);
> > +
> > +     spin_lock_irq(&request->engine->timeline->lock);
> > +     __i915_gem_request_submit(request);
> >       intel_engine_init_global_seqno(request->engine, request->global_seqno);
> > +     spin_unlock_irq(&request->engine->timeline->lock);
> >   }
> >   
> >   static void engine_set_wedged(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> > 
> 
> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>

Hmm, I better make that irqsave/irqrestore. I guess that will make you
happier as well :)
-Chris


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list