[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/i915: Use intel_get_pipe_timings() and intel_mode_from_pipe_config() in intel_crtc_mode_get()

Chris Wilson chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Mon Oct 9 16:24:29 UTC 2017


Quoting Ville Syrjälä (2017-10-09 17:18:17)
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 08:19:12PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > Quoting ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com (2016-04-01 19:48:50)
> > > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> > > 
> > > Eliminate the duplicate code for pipe timing readout in
> > > intel_crtc_mode_get() by using the functions we use for the normal state
> > > readout.
> > > 
> > > v2: Store dotclock in adjusted_mode instead of the final mode
> > > 
> > > Cc: dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> > > Cc: Rob Kramer <rob at solution-space.com>
> > > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
> > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> 
> Thanks for the review. Patches pushed to dinq.
> 
> > 
> > Fixes a pipe-state warn for me,
> > Tested-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> 
> However, now that I look at the code again I'm not 100% sure why this
> fixed anything. The readout still seems to fail at fully populating the
> mode flags. I'll post a more thorough solution that simply calls the
> normal state readout hooks for the crtc and encoder...

The first patch fixed up the implied A,B transcoder mixup. I just tested
both patches together. Do you want me to double check if it was just the
first patch that silenced the warnings? I'm just happy to have a clean
boot!
-Chris


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list