[Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 01/11] drm/i915: No need for RING_MAX_NONPRIV_SLOTS space
Oscar Mateo
oscar.mateo at intel.com
Mon Oct 9 20:58:16 UTC 2017
Now that we write RING_FORCE_TO_NONPRIV registers directly to hardware,
there is no need to save space for them in the list of context workarounds.
Signed-off-by: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo at intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala at linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 8 +-------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index 799a90a..47a357c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -1954,13 +1954,7 @@ struct i915_wa_reg {
u32 mask;
};
-/*
- * RING_MAX_NONPRIV_SLOTS is per-engine but at this point we are only
- * allowing it for RCS as we don't foresee any requirement of having
- * a whitelist for other engines. When it is really required for
- * other engines then the limit need to be increased.
- */
-#define I915_MAX_WA_REGS (16 + RING_MAX_NONPRIV_SLOTS)
+#define I915_MAX_WA_REGS 16
struct i915_workarounds {
struct i915_wa_reg reg[I915_MAX_WA_REGS];
--
1.9.1
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list