[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Start tracking PSR state in crtc state
Jani Nikula
jani.nikula at intel.com
Thu Oct 12 10:40:33 UTC 2017
On Thu, 12 Oct 2017, Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
>
> Add the minimal amount of PSR tracking into the crtc state. This allows
> precomputing the possibility of using PSR correctly, and it means we can
> safely call the psr enable/disable functions for any DP endcoder.
>
> As a nice bonus we get rid of some more crtc->config usage, which we
> want to kill off eventually.
>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 2 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 5 +++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 84 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> 3 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> index b0f446b68f42..753404280a19 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> @@ -1832,6 +1832,8 @@ intel_dp_compute_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> if (!HAS_DDI(dev_priv))
> intel_dp_set_clock(encoder, pipe_config);
>
> + intel_psr_compute_config(intel_dp, pipe_config);
> +
> return true;
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> index b87946dcc53f..d61985f93d40 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> @@ -718,6 +718,9 @@ struct intel_crtc_state {
> struct intel_link_m_n dp_m2_n2;
> bool has_drrs;
>
> + bool has_psr;
> + bool has_psr2;
> +
> /*
> * Frequence the dpll for the port should run at. Differs from the
> * adjusted dotclock e.g. for DP or 12bpc hdmi mode. This is also
> @@ -1764,6 +1767,8 @@ void intel_psr_flush(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> void intel_psr_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> void intel_psr_single_frame_update(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> unsigned frontbuffer_bits);
> +void intel_psr_compute_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> + struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
>
> /* intel_runtime_pm.c */
> int intel_power_domains_init(struct drm_i915_private *);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> index 5419cda83ba8..f6149af39f02 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> @@ -376,22 +376,25 @@ static void hsw_psr_activate(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> hsw_activate_psr1(intel_dp);
> }
>
> -static bool intel_psr_match_conditions(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> +void intel_psr_compute_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> + struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> {
> struct intel_digital_port *dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
> - struct drm_device *dev = dig_port->base.base.dev;
> - struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
> - struct drm_crtc *crtc = dig_port->base.base.crtc;
> - struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc);
> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dig_port->base.base.dev);
> const struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode =
> - &intel_crtc->config->base.adjusted_mode;
> + &crtc_state->base.adjusted_mode;
> int psr_setup_time;
>
> - lockdep_assert_held(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
> - WARN_ON(!drm_modeset_is_locked(&dev->mode_config.connection_mutex));
> - WARN_ON(!drm_modeset_is_locked(&crtc->mutex));
> + if (!HAS_PSR(dev_priv))
> + return;
>
> - dev_priv->psr.source_ok = false;
> + if (!is_edp_psr(intel_dp))
I guess I'd like an intel_dp_is_edp() check here or within is_edp_psr()
before touching intel_dp->psr_dpcd.
> + return;
> +
> + if (!i915_modparams.enable_psr) {
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR disable by flag\n");
> + return;
> + }
>
> /*
> * HSW spec explicitly says PSR is tied to port A.
> @@ -402,66 +405,70 @@ static bool intel_psr_match_conditions(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> */
> if (HAS_DDI(dev_priv) && dig_port->port != PORT_A) {
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR condition failed: Port not supported\n");
> - return false;
> - }
> -
> - if (!i915_modparams.enable_psr) {
> - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR disable by flag\n");
> - return false;
> + return;
> }
>
> if ((IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev_priv) || IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv)) &&
> !dev_priv->psr.link_standby) {
> DRM_ERROR("PSR condition failed: Link off requested but not supported on this platform\n");
> - return false;
> + return;
> }
>
> if (IS_HASWELL(dev_priv) &&
> - I915_READ(HSW_STEREO_3D_CTL(intel_crtc->config->cpu_transcoder)) &
> + I915_READ(HSW_STEREO_3D_CTL(crtc_state->cpu_transcoder)) &
> S3D_ENABLE) {
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR condition failed: Stereo 3D is Enabled\n");
> - return false;
> + return;
> }
>
> if (IS_HASWELL(dev_priv) &&
> adjusted_mode->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_INTERLACE) {
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR condition failed: Interlaced is Enabled\n");
> - return false;
> + return;
> }
>
> psr_setup_time = drm_dp_psr_setup_time(intel_dp->psr_dpcd);
> if (psr_setup_time < 0) {
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR condition failed: Invalid PSR setup time (0x%02x)\n",
> intel_dp->psr_dpcd[1]);
> - return false;
> + return;
> }
>
> if (intel_usecs_to_scanlines(adjusted_mode, psr_setup_time) >
> adjusted_mode->crtc_vtotal - adjusted_mode->crtc_vdisplay - 1) {
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR condition failed: PSR setup time (%d us) too long\n",
> psr_setup_time);
> - return false;
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * FIXME psr2_support is messed up. It's both computed
> + * dynamically during PSR enable, and extracted from sink
> + * caps during eDP detection.
> + */
Agreed, yuck.
> + if (!dev_priv->psr.psr2_support) {
> + crtc_state->has_psr = true;
> + return;
> }
>
> /* PSR2 is restricted to work with panel resolutions upto 3200x2000 */
> - if (dev_priv->psr.psr2_support &&
> - (intel_crtc->config->pipe_src_w > 3200 ||
> - intel_crtc->config->pipe_src_h > 2000)) {
> - dev_priv->psr.psr2_support = false;
> - return false;
> + if (adjusted_mode->crtc_hdisplay > 3200 ||
> + adjusted_mode->crtc_vdisplay > 2000) {
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR2 disabled, panel resolution too big\n");
This branch doesn't set has_psr = true, shouldn't it? Maybe move that
before the if (!dev_priv->psr.psr2_support) condition from within the
block?
> + return;
> }
>
> /*
> * FIXME:enable psr2 only for y-cordinate psr2 panels
> * After gtc implementation , remove this restriction.
> */
> - if (!dev_priv->psr.y_cord_support && dev_priv->psr.psr2_support) {
> + if (!dev_priv->psr.y_cord_support) {
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR2 disabled, panel does not support Y coordinate\n");
> - return false;
> + return;
> }
>
> - dev_priv->psr.source_ok = true;
> - return true;
> + crtc_state->has_psr = true;
> + crtc_state->has_psr2 = true;
> }
>
> static void intel_psr_activate(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> @@ -531,13 +538,8 @@ void intel_psr_enable(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> struct drm_device *dev = intel_dig_port->base.base.dev;
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
>
> - if (!HAS_PSR(dev_priv))
> - return;
> -
> - if (!is_edp_psr(intel_dp)) {
> - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR not supported by this panel\n");
> - return;
> - }
> + if (!crtc_state->has_psr)
> + goto unlock;
It's not locked yet...
BR,
Jani.
>
> WARN_ON(dev_priv->drrs.dp);
> mutex_lock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
> @@ -546,8 +548,8 @@ void intel_psr_enable(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> goto unlock;
> }
>
> - if (!intel_psr_match_conditions(intel_dp))
> - goto unlock;
> + dev_priv->psr.psr2_support = crtc_state->has_psr2;
> + dev_priv->psr.source_ok = true;
>
> dev_priv->psr.busy_frontbuffer_bits = 0;
>
> @@ -668,7 +670,7 @@ void intel_psr_disable(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> struct drm_device *dev = intel_dig_port->base.base.dev;
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
>
> - if (!HAS_PSR(dev_priv))
> + if (!old_crtc_state->has_psr)
> return;
>
> mutex_lock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list