[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for igt/gem_eio: Check hang/eio recovery during suspend

[Daniel Vetter]

On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 09:20:46AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Arkadiusz Hiler (2017-10-12 09:15:33)
> > On Sat, Oct 07, 2017 at 03:38:09AM +0000, Patchwork wrote:
> > > == Series Details ==
> > > 
> > > Series: igt/gem_eio: Check hang/eio recovery during suspend
> > > URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/31485/
> > > State : success
> > > 
> > > == Summary ==
> > > 
> > > Test gem_eio:
> > >         Subgroup in-flight-contexts:
> > >                 dmesg-warn -> PASS       (shard-hsw) fdo#102886 +1
> > > Test kms_cursor_legacy:
> > >         Subgroup cursorA-vs-flipA-atomic-transitions:
> > >                 fail       -> PASS       (shard-hsw) fdo#102723
> > > 
> > > fdo#102886 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102886
> > > fdo#102723 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102723
> > > 
> > > shard-hsw        total:2447 pass:1329 dwarn:7   dfail:0   fail:8   skip:1103 time:10232s
> > > 
> > > == Logs ==
> > > 
> > > For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_305/shards.html
> > 
> > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_305/shards-all.html
> > 
> > 3x dmesg-warn with moaning about lock dependency in i915_gem_suspend,
> 
> They are not new.
> 
> > huh but the one incomplete is even more concerning
> 
> And lacks info, so could be anything including a new discovery

It is, this new gem_eio/in-flight-suspend kills snb. Do you have a bugfix?
We've been pretty close to adding snb to the set of shard machines that
report results, but this sets it back again (we can't have incompletes due
to the other tests that victimizes).
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch