[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 7/8] drm/i915: Use cdclk_state->voltage on CNL
Rodrigo Vivi
rodrigo.vivi at intel.com
Wed Oct 18 21:50:59 UTC 2017
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 08:48:24PM +0000, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
>
> Track the system agent voltage we request from pcode in the cdclk state
> on CNL. Annoyingly we can't actually read out the current value since
> there's no pcode command to do that, so we'll have to just assume that
> it worked.
+static u32 cnl_cur_voltage(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
+{
+ u32 voltage;
+ sandybridge_pcode_read(dev_priv, SKL_PCODE_CDCLK_CONTROL, &voltage);
+ return voltage;
+}
+
static void cnl_get_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
struct intel_cdclk_state *cdclk_state)
{
@@ -1486,8 +1493,7 @@ static void cnl_get_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
cdclk_state->cdclk = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(cdclk_state->vco, div);
+ cdclk_state->voltage = cnl_cur_voltage(dev_priv);
}
static void cnl_cdclk_pll_disable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
@@ -1594,8 +1600,7 @@ static void cnl_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
intel_update_cdclk(dev_priv);
+ dev_priv->cdclk.hw.voltage = cnl_cur_voltage(dev_priv);
>
> Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola at intel.com>
> Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare at intel.com>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
> index 1b4dcd9689da..795a18f64c4c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
> @@ -1505,6 +1505,19 @@ static int cnl_calc_cdclk(int min_cdclk)
> return 168000;
> }
>
> +static u8 cnl_calc_voltage(int cdclk)
> +{
> + switch (cdclk) {
> + default:
> + case 168000:
> + return 0;
> + case 336000:
> + return 1;
> + case 528000:
> + return 2;
> + }
> +}
where is the port_clock taking into account?
> +
> static void cnl_cdclk_pll_update(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> struct intel_cdclk_state *cdclk_state)
> {
> @@ -1538,7 +1551,7 @@ static void cnl_get_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> cdclk_state->cdclk = cdclk_state->ref;
>
> if (cdclk_state->vco == 0)
> - return;
> + goto out;
>
> divider = I915_READ(CDCLK_CTL) & BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_DIV_SEL_MASK;
>
> @@ -1555,6 +1568,13 @@ static void cnl_get_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> }
>
> cdclk_state->cdclk = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(cdclk_state->vco, div);
> +
> + out:
> + /*
> + * Can't read this out :( Let's assume it's
> + * at least what the CDCLK frequency requires.
> + */
> + cdclk_state->voltage = cnl_calc_voltage(cdclk_state->cdclk);
> }
>
> static void cnl_cdclk_pll_disable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> @@ -1595,7 +1615,7 @@ static void cnl_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> {
> int cdclk = cdclk_state->cdclk;
> int vco = cdclk_state->vco;
> - u32 val, divider, pcu_ack;
> + u32 val, divider;
> int ret;
>
> mutex_lock(&dev_priv->pcu_lock);
> @@ -1624,19 +1644,6 @@ static void cnl_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> break;
> }
>
> - switch (cdclk) {
> - case 528000:
> - pcu_ack = 2;
> - break;
> - case 336000:
> - pcu_ack = 1;
> - break;
> - case 168000:
> - default:
> - pcu_ack = 0;
> - break;
> - }
> -
> if (dev_priv->cdclk.hw.vco != 0 &&
> dev_priv->cdclk.hw.vco != vco)
> cnl_cdclk_pll_disable(dev_priv);
> @@ -1654,7 +1661,8 @@ static void cnl_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>
> /* inform PCU of the change */
> mutex_lock(&dev_priv->pcu_lock);
> - sandybridge_pcode_write(dev_priv, SKL_PCODE_CDCLK_CONTROL, pcu_ack);
> + sandybridge_pcode_write(dev_priv, SKL_PCODE_CDCLK_CONTROL,
> + cdclk_state->voltage);
> mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->pcu_lock);
>
> intel_update_cdclk(dev_priv);
> @@ -1747,6 +1755,7 @@ void cnl_init_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>
> cdclk_state.cdclk = cnl_calc_cdclk(0);
> cdclk_state.vco = cnl_cdclk_pll_vco(dev_priv, cdclk_state.cdclk);
> + cdclk_state.voltage = cnl_calc_voltage(cdclk_state.cdclk);
>
> cnl_set_cdclk(dev_priv, &cdclk_state);
> }
> @@ -1764,6 +1773,7 @@ void cnl_uninit_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>
> cdclk_state.cdclk = cdclk_state.ref;
> cdclk_state.vco = 0;
> + cdclk_state.voltage = cnl_calc_voltage(cdclk_state.cdclk);
>
> cnl_set_cdclk(dev_priv, &cdclk_state);
> }
> @@ -2081,6 +2091,7 @@ static int cnl_modeset_calc_cdclk(struct drm_atomic_state *state)
>
> intel_state->cdclk.logical.vco = vco;
> intel_state->cdclk.logical.cdclk = cdclk;
> + intel_state->cdclk.logical.voltage = cnl_calc_voltage(cdclk);
>
> if (!intel_state->active_crtcs) {
> cdclk = cnl_calc_cdclk(0);
> @@ -2088,6 +2099,7 @@ static int cnl_modeset_calc_cdclk(struct drm_atomic_state *state)
>
> intel_state->cdclk.actual.vco = vco;
> intel_state->cdclk.actual.cdclk = cdclk;
> + intel_state->cdclk.actual.voltage = cnl_calc_voltage(cdclk);
> } else {
> intel_state->cdclk.actual =
> intel_state->cdclk.logical;
> --
> 2.13.6
>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list