[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Filter out spurious execlists context-switch interrupts
Mika Kuoppala
mika.kuoppala at linux.intel.com
Fri Oct 20 13:59:44 UTC 2017
Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:
> Back in commit a4b2b01523a8 ("drm/i915: Don't mark an execlists
> context-switch when idle") we noticed the presence of late
> context-switch interrupts. We were able to filter those out by looking
> at whether the ELSP remained active, but in commit beecec901790
> ("drm/i915/execlists: Preemption!") that became problematic as we now
> anticipate receiving a context-switch event for preemption while ELSP
> may be empty. To restore the spurious interrupt suppression, add a
> counter for the expected number of pending context-switches and skip if
> we do not need to handle this interrupt to make forward progress.
>
> Fixes: beecec901790 ("drm/i915/execlists: Preemption!")
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Michal Winiarski <michal.winiarski at intel.com>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
> Cc: Arkadiusz Hiler <arkadiusz.hiler at intel.com>
> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala at intel.com>
> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen at linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c | 11 ++++++-----
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 6 ++++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c | 5 +++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++----
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h | 7 +++++++
> 5 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c
> index a2e8114b739d..c22d0a07467c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c
> @@ -550,11 +550,9 @@ static void port_assign(struct execlist_port *port,
> struct drm_i915_gem_request *rq)
> {
> GEM_BUG_ON(rq == port_request(port));
> + GEM_BUG_ON(port_isset(port));
>
> - if (port_isset(port))
> - i915_gem_request_put(port_request(port));
> -
> - port_set(port, port_pack(i915_gem_request_get(rq), port_count(port)));
> + port_set(port, i915_gem_request_get(rq));
No lite restore with guc so we can make this more strict and lean?
> nested_enable_signaling(rq);
> }
>
> @@ -586,8 +584,10 @@ static void i915_guc_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> goto done;
> }
>
> - if (submit)
> + if (submit) {
> port_assign(port, last);
> + execlists->active++;
> + }
> port++;
> }
>
> @@ -610,6 +610,7 @@ static void i915_guc_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> execlists->first = rb;
> if (submit) {
> port_assign(port, last);
> + execlists->active++;
> i915_guc_submit(engine);
> }
> spin_unlock_irq(&engine->timeline->lock);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> index b1296a55c1e4..f8205841868b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> @@ -1388,8 +1388,10 @@ gen8_cs_irq_handler(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, u32 iir, int test_shift)
> bool tasklet = false;
>
> if (iir & (GT_CONTEXT_SWITCH_INTERRUPT << test_shift)) {
> - __set_bit(ENGINE_IRQ_EXECLIST, &engine->irq_posted);
> - tasklet = true;
> + if (READ_ONCE(engine->execlists.active)) {
> + __set_bit(ENGINE_IRQ_EXECLIST, &engine->irq_posted);
> + tasklet = true;
> + }
> }
>
> if (iir & (GT_RENDER_USER_INTERRUPT << test_shift)) {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c
> index a47a9c6bea52..8aecbc321786 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c
> @@ -1548,8 +1548,8 @@ bool intel_engine_is_idle(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> if (test_bit(ENGINE_IRQ_EXECLIST, &engine->irq_posted))
> return false;
>
> - /* Both ports drained, no more ELSP submission? */
> - if (port_request(&engine->execlists.port[0]))
> + /* Waiting to drain ELSP? */
> + if (READ_ONCE(engine->execlists.active))
> return false;
>
It would not make sense now to keep the port[0] check but
we could get more fine grained debugging info if we keep
it?
-Mika
> /* ELSP is empty, but there are ready requests? */
> @@ -1749,6 +1749,7 @@ void intel_engine_dump(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, struct drm_printer *m)
> idx);
> }
> }
> + drm_printf(m, "\t\tELSP active %d\n", execlists->active);
> rcu_read_unlock();
> } else if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) > 6) {
> drm_printf(m, "\tPP_DIR_BASE: 0x%08x\n",
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> index 7f45dd7dc3e5..8a47b8211c74 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> @@ -482,15 +482,23 @@ static bool can_merge_ctx(const struct i915_gem_context *prev,
> return true;
> }
>
> -static void port_assign(struct execlist_port *port,
> +static bool port_assign(struct execlist_port *port,
> struct drm_i915_gem_request *rq)
> {
> + bool was_idle;
> +
> GEM_BUG_ON(rq == port_request(port));
>
> - if (port_isset(port))
> + if (port_isset(port)) {
> i915_gem_request_put(port_request(port));
> + was_idle = false;
> + } else {
> + was_idle = true;
> + }
>
> port_set(port, port_pack(i915_gem_request_get(rq), port_count(port)));
> +
> + return was_idle;
> }
>
> static void inject_preempt_context(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> @@ -657,7 +665,7 @@ static void execlists_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> GEM_BUG_ON(last->ctx == rq->ctx);
>
> if (submit)
> - port_assign(port, last);
> + execlists->active += port_assign(port, last);
> port++;
>
> GEM_BUG_ON(port_isset(port));
> @@ -679,7 +687,7 @@ static void execlists_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> done:
> execlists->first = rb;
> if (submit)
> - port_assign(port, last);
> + execlists->active += port_assign(port, last);
> unlock:
> spin_unlock_irq(&engine->timeline->lock);
>
> @@ -696,10 +704,12 @@ execlist_cancel_port_requests(struct intel_engine_execlists *execlists)
> while (num_ports-- && port_isset(port)) {
> struct drm_i915_gem_request *rq = port_request(port);
>
> + GEM_BUG_ON(!execlists->active);
> execlists_context_status_change(rq, INTEL_CONTEXT_SCHEDULE_PREEMPTED);
> i915_gem_request_put(rq);
>
> memset(port, 0, sizeof(*port));
> + execlists->active--;
> port++;
> }
> }
> @@ -863,6 +873,8 @@ static void intel_lrc_irq_handler(unsigned long data)
>
> GEM_BUG_ON(!execlists->preempt);
> execlists->preempt = false;
> + execlists->active--;
> + GEM_BUG_ON(execlists->active);
> continue;
> }
>
> @@ -1461,6 +1473,7 @@ static int gen8_init_common_ring(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> clear_bit(ENGINE_IRQ_EXECLIST, &engine->irq_posted);
> execlists->csb_head = -1;
> execlists->preempt = false;
> + execlists->active = 0;
>
> /* After a GPU reset, we may have requests to replay */
> if (!i915_modparams.enable_guc_submission && execlists->first)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
> index 17186f067408..588f5fe9d2b7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
> @@ -245,6 +245,11 @@ struct intel_engine_execlists {
> */
> bool preempt;
>
> + /**
> + * @active: count of the number of outstanding CSB events
> + */
> + unsigned int active;
> +
> /**
> * @port_mask: number of execlist ports - 1
> */
> @@ -538,9 +543,11 @@ execlists_port_complete(struct intel_engine_execlists * const execlists,
> const unsigned int m = execlists->port_mask;
>
> GEM_BUG_ON(port_index(port, execlists) != 0);
> + GEM_BUG_ON(!execlists->active);
>
> memmove(port, port + 1, m * sizeof(struct execlist_port));
> memset(port + m, 0, sizeof(struct execlist_port));
> + execlists->active--;
> }
>
> static inline unsigned int
> --
> 2.15.0.rc1
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list