[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 2/4] drm/i915/guc : Removing i915_modparams.enable_guc_loading module parameter

Sujaritha sujaritha.sundaresan at intel.com
Mon Oct 23 16:56:59 UTC 2017



On 10/17/2017 03:57 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Sujaritha Sundaresan (2017-10-17 23:50:47)
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>> index dd141b2..5b9bdd0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>> @@ -3201,9 +3201,12 @@ static inline unsigned int i915_sg_segment_size(void)
>>    */
>>   #define HAS_GUC(dev_priv)      ((dev_priv)->info.has_guc)
>>   #define HAS_GUC_CT(dev_priv)   ((dev_priv)->info.has_guc_ct)
>> -#define HAS_GUC_UCODE(dev_priv)        (HAS_GUC(dev_priv))
>> -#define HAS_GUC_SCHED(dev_priv)        (HAS_GUC(dev_priv))
>> -#define HAS_HUC_UCODE(dev_priv)        (HAS_GUC(dev_priv))
>> +#define HAS_GUC_UCODE(dev_priv) ((dev_priv)->guc.fw.path != NULL)
>> +#define HAS_HUC_UCODE(dev_priv) ((dev_priv)->huc.fw.path != NULL)
>> +
>> +#define NEEDS_GUC_LOADING(dev_priv) \
>> +       (HAS_GUC(dev_priv) && \
>> +       (i915_modparams.enable_guc_submission || HAS_HUC_UCODE(dev_priv)))
> NEEDS_GUC_FW ?
> -Chris
Sure. Will do.

Thanks for the review.

Sujaritha



More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list