[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/gvt: Use common error handling code in shadow_workload_ring_buffer()
Wang, Zhi A
zhi.a.wang at intel.com
Tue Oct 24 18:56:27 UTC 2017
Thanks for the patch! Actually I would prefer that we can have different error messages here. E.g. like copy_gma_to_hva fail in which part of ring buffer. Or we can directly remove the error message since usually if it fails it means a bug of MPT module when GVT-g is accessing the guest memory by Xen/KVM functions and it shouldn’t happen unless MPT modules has a bug, :( so I wish the error message can be reported in MPT module. :)
Thanks for the patch. :)
Thanks,
Zhi.
-----Original Message-----
From: SF Markus Elfring [mailto:elfring at users.sourceforge.net]
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2017 3:26 PM
To: dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org; intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org; intel-gvt-dev at lists.freedesktop.org; David Airlie <airlied at linux.ie>; Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at linux.intel.com>; Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen at linux.intel.com>; Vivi, Rodrigo <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>; Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw at linux.intel.com>; Wang, Zhi A <zhi.a.wang at intel.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org>; kernel-janitors at vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915/gvt: Use common error handling code in shadow_workload_ring_buffer()
From: Markus Elfring <elfring at users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 14:20:06 +0200
Add a jump target so that a call of the function "gvt_vgpu_err" is stored only once at the end of this function implementation.
Replace two calls by goto statements.
This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring at users.sourceforge.net>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/cmd_parser.c | 18 ++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/cmd_parser.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/cmd_parser.c
index 2c0ccbb817dc..caa181380958 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/cmd_parser.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/cmd_parser.c
@@ -2640,10 +2640,9 @@ static int shadow_workload_ring_buffer(struct intel_vgpu_workload *workload)
if (gma_head > gma_tail) {
ret = copy_gma_to_hva(vgpu, vgpu->gtt.ggtt_mm,
gma_head, gma_top, shadow_ring_buffer_va);
- if (ret < 0) {
- gvt_vgpu_err("fail to copy guest ring buffer\n");
- return ret;
- }
+ if (ret < 0)
+ goto report_failure;
+
shadow_ring_buffer_va += ret;
gma_head = workload->rb_start;
}
@@ -2651,11 +2650,14 @@ static int shadow_workload_ring_buffer(struct intel_vgpu_workload *workload)
/* copy head or start <-> tail */
ret = copy_gma_to_hva(vgpu, vgpu->gtt.ggtt_mm, gma_head, gma_tail,
shadow_ring_buffer_va);
- if (ret < 0) {
- gvt_vgpu_err("fail to copy guest ring buffer\n");
- return ret;
- }
+ if (ret < 0)
+ goto report_failure;
+
return 0;
+
+report_failure:
+ gvt_vgpu_err("fail to copy guest ring buffer\n");
+ return ret;
}
int intel_gvt_scan_and_shadow_ringbuffer(struct intel_vgpu_workload *workload)
--
2.14.3
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list