[Intel-gfx] [PATCH igt] igt/gem_exec_latency: Wire up an interloper for preemption
Petri Latvala
petri.latvala at intel.com
Fri Oct 27 09:11:02 UTC 2017
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 12:15:32PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Michał Winiarski (2017-10-26 11:52:31)
> > On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 08:31:27AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > For measuring the cost of preemption, inject a low priority spinner
> > > between the two measurements; the difference between the preemption and
> > > the normal dispatch includes both the cost of the spinner dispatch and
> > > of preempting it. Close enough for us to estimate the cost of
> > > preemption, though we don't measure the cost of preemption on the local
> > > ring!
> >
> > And as expected, we're seeing more delay with GuC, probably from worker
> > scheduling delay (~2ms on my SKL if I'm reading the results correctly).
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski at intel.com>
You forgot to... wait...
> And I forgot to copy'n'paste the r-b before pushing. The inquisition
> will be calling shortly.
B...b.b.but you're not supposed to expect the (spanish)
inquisition... =(
--
Petri Latvala
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list