[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 5/6] drm/i915/guc : Updating GuC logs to remove enable_guc_submission parameter
Sagar Arun Kamble
sagar.a.kamble at intel.com
Mon Oct 30 07:44:27 UTC 2017
On 10/24/2017 10:51 PM, Sujaritha Sundaresan wrote:
> Replacing conditions to remove dependance on enable_guc_submission
>
> Signed-off-by: Sujaritha Sundaresan <sujaritha.sundaresan at intel.com>
> Cc: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa at intel.com>
> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko at intel.com>
> Cc: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo at intel.com>
> Cc: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_log.c | 8 +++-----
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_log.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_log.c
> index 76d3eb1..c9f0167 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_log.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_log.c
> @@ -505,8 +505,7 @@ static void guc_flush_logs(struct intel_guc *guc)
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = guc_to_i915(guc);
>
> - if (!i915_modparams.enable_guc_submission ||
> - (i915_modparams.guc_log_level < 0))
> + if (!NEEDS_GUC_FW(dev_priv))
this will just check if GuC is loaded but we will still need check for
log_level.
> return;
>
> /* First disable the interrupts, will be renabled afterwards */
> @@ -646,8 +645,7 @@ int i915_guc_log_control(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u64 control_val)
>
> void i915_guc_log_register(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> {
> - if (!i915_modparams.enable_guc_submission ||
> - (i915_modparams.guc_log_level < 0))
> + if (!NEEDS_GUC_FW(dev_priv))
same here.
> return;
>
> mutex_lock(&dev_priv->drm.struct_mutex);
> @@ -657,7 +655,7 @@ void i915_guc_log_register(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>
> void i915_guc_log_unregister(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> {
> - if (!i915_modparams.enable_guc_submission)
> + if (!NEEDS_GUC_FW(dev_priv))
This is fine.
> return;
>
> mutex_lock(&dev_priv->drm.struct_mutex);
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list