[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] igt/gem_workarounds: Test all types of workarounds
Oscar Mateo
oscar.mateo at intel.com
Mon Oct 30 20:02:19 UTC 2017
On 10/16/2017 02:05 AM, Petri Latvala wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 01:32:58PM -0700, Oscar Mateo wrote:
>>
>> On 10/12/2017 05:40 AM, Petri Latvala wrote:
>>> On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 11:15:40AM -0700, Oscar Mateo wrote:
>>>> Apart from context based workarounds, we can now also test for global
>>>> MMIO and whitelisting ones.
>>>>
>>>> Do take into account that this test does not guarantee that all known
>>>> WAs for a given platform are applied. It only checks that the WAs the
>>>> kernel does know about are correctly applied (e.g. they didn't get
>>>> lost on a GPU reset or a suspend/resume).
>>>>
>>>> v2:
>>>> - Do not wait for the GPU unnecessarily (Chris)
>>>> - Make a comment that this tests only looks for regressions (Chris)
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo at intel.com>
>>>> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
>>>> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala at linux.intel.com>
>>> Subjectprefix didn't contain i-g-t so CI did not pick this up.
>>>
>> Thanks for the heads up, Petri. I forgot to add the label, but it doesn't
>> matter that much because this patch is going to fail CI until the companion
>> patches make it to the KMD (is there a BKM to deal with this situation?).
> That still tests if it builds in the CI environment, whether it
> affects other tests, and shows how the failure behaves.
>
> How is the test supposed to behave on older kernels, like stable
> releases (4.4.x, 4.12.x, etc)? Is "fail" proper for kernels without
> the KMD changes required, instead of producing a skip? If that is the
> case, the best story is to keep sending the patch towards CI, collect
> reviews, possibly resend for one more CI run after kernel changes have
> landed to see lights turn green, land tests. If the test is behaving
> well with "broken" kernels it can even be landed before the kernel
> changes, if the used interfaces already exist in kernel upstream.
Got it. Thank you, Petri. I can modify the test so that it keeps working
with older kernels, which looks like the best possible approach.
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list