[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/perf: Remove __user from u64 in drm_i915_perf_oa_config

Lionel Landwerlin lionel.g.landwerlin at intel.com
Fri Sep 1 15:05:26 UTC 2017


Sure :

Reviewed-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin at intel.com>

On 01/09/17 15:57, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Sparse complains that these integers from which we form void __user *,
> and so we don't need the annotation itself inside the uABI.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin at intel.com>
> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld at intel.com>
> ---
>   include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h | 6 +++---
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h
> index 6598fb76d2c2..d8d10d932759 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h
> @@ -1509,9 +1509,9 @@ struct drm_i915_perf_oa_config {
>   	__u32 n_boolean_regs;
>   	__u32 n_flex_regs;
>   
> -	__u64 __user mux_regs_ptr;
> -	__u64 __user boolean_regs_ptr;
> -	__u64 __user flex_regs_ptr;
> +	__u64 mux_regs_ptr;
> +	__u64 boolean_regs_ptr;
> +	__u64 flex_regs_ptr;
>   };
>   
>   #if defined(__cplusplus)




More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list