[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 1/2] drm/i915: Track minimum acceptable cdclk instead of "minimum dotclock"

[Ville Syrjälä]

On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 12:39:25PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Op 31-08-17 om 20:48 schreef Ville Syrjälä:
> > On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 09:57:03PM +0300, ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com wrote:
> >> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> >>
> >> Make the min_pixclk thing less confusing by changing it to track
> >> the minimum acceptable cdclk frequency instead. This means moving
> >> the application of the guardbands to a slightly higher level from
> >> the low level platform specific calc_cdclk() functions.
> >>
> >> The immediate benefit is elimination of the confusing 2x factors
> >> on GLK/CNL+ in the audio workarounds (which stems from the fact
> >> that the pipes produce two pixels per clock).
> >>
> >> v2: Keep cdclk higher on CNL to workaround missing DDI clock voltage handling
> >> v3: Squash with the CNL cdclk limits patch (DK)
> >> v4: s/intel_min_cdclk/intel_pixel_rate_to_cdclk/ (DK)
> >>
> >> Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni at intel.com>
> >> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
> >> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan at intel.com>
> >> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com>
> >> Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan at intel.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> > I didn't get any objections from the CNL camp, so I went ahead and
> > pushed the series. Thanks for the reviews.
> >
> I seem to have a WARN_ON during init now on my broadwell, likely related to this series?
> 
> [   13.105310] i915 0000:00:02.0: vgaarb: changed VGA decodes: olddecodes=io+mem,decodes=io+mem:owns=io+mem
> [   13.132264] systemd-journald[159]: Successfully sent stream file descriptor to service manager.
> [   13.161016] WARN_ON(min_cdclk < 0)

Hmm. I think I need to see the full dmesg to figure this one out.

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC