[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/11] drm/i915: Check PIN_NONFAULT overlaps in evict_for_node

[Chris Wilson]

If the caller says that he doesn't want to evict any other faulting
vma, honour that flag. The logic was used in evict_something, but not
the more specific evict_for_node, now being used as a preliminary probe
since commit 606fec956c0e ("drm/i915: Prefer random replacement before
eviction search").

Fixes: 606fec956c0e ("drm/i915: Prefer random replacement before eviction search")
Fixes: 821188778b9b ("drm/i915: Choose not to evict faultable objects from the GGTT")
References: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/174781/
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen at linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.c | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.c
index 933ee8ecfa54..a5a5b7e6daae 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.c
@@ -315,6 +315,11 @@ int i915_gem_evict_for_node(struct i915_address_space *vm,
 			break;
 		}
 
+		if (flags & PIN_NONFAULT && i915_vma_has_userfault(vma)) {
+			ret = -ENOSPC;
+			break;
+		}
+
 		/* Overlap of objects in the same batch? */
 		if (i915_vma_is_pinned(vma)) {
 			ret = -ENOSPC;
-- 
2.14.1