[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tools_test: Clean up and fix sysfs_l3_parity
Abdiel Janulgue
abdiel.janulgue at linux.intel.com
Wed Sep 20 06:42:44 UTC 2017
On 09/19/2017 02:33 PM, Petri Latvala wrote:
> Multiple misunderstandings of the expectations of the test and some
> missed parts of the shell-to-c conversion caused a couple of issues to
> remain.
>
> First, we need to actually disable a subbank before we check that a
> subbank is disabled (invoke the tool with -d).
>
> Second, the original pipe to wc -l was to check that the tool prints
> only one line, not that it prints "at least" a line. Modify the last
> check to verify that an "is disabled" text is _not_ printed.
>
> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101650
> CC: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue at linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala at intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue at linux.intel.com>
> ---
> tests/tools_test.c | 83 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
> 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/tools_test.c b/tests/tools_test.c
> index 132bb88b..ed32bb29 100644
> --- a/tests/tools_test.c
> +++ b/tests/tools_test.c
> @@ -28,26 +28,31 @@
> #include <fcntl.h>
>
> struct line_check {
> - bool found;
> + int found;
> const char *substr;
> };
>
> /**
> * Our igt_log_buffer_inspect handler. Checks the output of the
> - * intel_l3_parity tool and returns line_check::found to true if
> - * a specific substring is found.
> + * intel_l3_parity tool and increments line_check::found if a specific
> + * substring is found.
> */
> -static bool check_cmd_return_value(const char *line, void *data)
> +static bool check_cmd_output(const char *line, void *data)
> {
> struct line_check *check = data;
>
> - if (!strstr(line, check->substr)) {
> - check->found = false;
> - return false;
> + if (strstr(line, check->substr)) {
> + check->found++;
> }
>
> - check->found = true;
> - return true;
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> +static void assert_cmd_success(int exec_return)
> +{
> + igt_skip_on_f(exec_return == IGT_EXIT_SKIP,
> + "intel_l3_parity not supported\n");
> + igt_assert_eq(exec_return, IGT_EXIT_SUCCESS);
> }
>
> igt_main
> @@ -56,46 +61,50 @@ igt_main
>
> igt_subtest("sysfs_l3_parity") {
> int exec_return;
> + struct line_check line;
>
> + /* Sanity check that l3 parity tool is usable: Enable
> + * row,bank,subbank 0,0,0.
> + */
> igt_system_cmd(exec_return,
> "../tools/intel_l3_parity -r 0 -b 0 "
> "-s 0 -e");
> - igt_skip_on_f(exec_return == IGT_EXIT_SKIP,
> - "intel_l3_parity not supported\n");
> - igt_assert_eq(exec_return, IGT_EXIT_SUCCESS);
> + assert_cmd_success(exec_return);
>
> + /* Disable row,bank,subbank 0,0,0. */
> + igt_system_cmd(exec_return, "../tools/intel_l3_parity -r 0 -b 0 "
> + "-s 0 -d");
> + assert_cmd_success(exec_return);
> +
> + /* Check that disabling was successful */
> igt_system_cmd(exec_return, "../tools/intel_l3_parity -l");
> - if (exec_return == IGT_EXIT_SUCCESS) {
> - struct line_check line;
> - line.substr = "Row 0, Bank 0, Subbank 0 is disabled";
> - igt_log_buffer_inspect(check_cmd_return_value,
> - &line);
> - igt_assert_eq(line.found, true);
> - }
> + assert_cmd_success(exec_return);
> + line.substr = "Row 0, Bank 0, Subbank 0 is disabled";
> + line.found = 0;
> + igt_log_buffer_inspect(check_cmd_output,
> + &line);
> + igt_assert_eq(line.found, 1);
>
> + /* Re-enable row,bank,subbank 0,0,0 */
> igt_system_cmd(exec_return,
> "../tools/intel_l3_parity -r 0 -b 0 "
> "-s 0 -e");
> - igt_skip_on_f(exec_return == IGT_EXIT_SKIP,
> - "intel_l3_parity not supported\n");
> - igt_assert_eq(exec_return, IGT_EXIT_SUCCESS);
> + assert_cmd_success(exec_return);
>
> - /* Check that we can clear remaps:
> - * In the original shell script, the output of intel_l3_parity -l
> - * was piped thru wc -l to check if the tool would at least
> - * return a line. Just watch for one of the expected output
> - * string as an alternative.
> - * ("is disabled" unique only to intel_l3_parity.c:dumpit())
> + /* Check that re-enabling was successful:
> + * intel_l3_parity -l should now not print that Row 0,
> + * Bank 0, Subbank 0 is disabled.
> + *
> + * The previously printed line is already in the log
> + * buffer so we check for count 1.
> */
> - igt_system_cmd(exec_return,
> - "../tools/intel_l3_parity -l");
> - if (exec_return == IGT_EXIT_SUCCESS) {
> - struct line_check line;
> - line.substr = "is disabled";
> - igt_log_buffer_inspect(check_cmd_return_value,
> - &line);
> - igt_assert_eq(line.found, true);
> - }
> + igt_system_cmd(exec_return, "../tools/intel_l3_parity -l");
> + assert_cmd_success(exec_return);
> + line.substr = "Row 0, Bank 0, Subbank 0 is disabled";
> + line.found = 0;
> + igt_log_buffer_inspect(check_cmd_output,
> + &line);
> + igt_assert_eq(line.found, 1);
> }
>
> igt_subtest("tools_test") {
>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list