[Intel-gfx] [igt] igt/kms_psr_sink_crc: Fix regression in psr_drrs subtest

[Pandiyan, Dhinakaran]

On Thu, 2017-09-21 at 07:53 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 01:37:31AM +0000, Radhakrishna Sripada wrote:
> > The substring to be matched is modified to reflect kernel code.
> 
> Well, technically it is not a regression on psr_drrs because it has
> this bug since the beginning ;)
> 
> Also this commit message doesn't explain the false positive case
> that DK pointed out.
> 
> Also this doesn't explain that is safe to use the reverse logic
> of !yes because DRRS is only enabled for eDP. Otherwise we would
> have to parse specifically the eDP block.
> 
> What brings me the question of why do we list all that useless
> information on debugfs? :)
> 
> > 
> > Fixes: 33355210a43e (igt/kms_psr_sink_crc: Add psr_drrs subtest)
> > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
> > Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan at intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Radhakrishna Sripada <radhakrishna.sripada at intel.com>
> 
> Please also CC other folks that are currently working on DRRS..
> 
> > ---
> >  tests/kms_psr_sink_crc.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/tests/kms_psr_sink_crc.c b/tests/kms_psr_sink_crc.c
> > index 1c25f2c81a34..f023b12c0131 100644
> > --- a/tests/kms_psr_sink_crc.c
> > +++ b/tests/kms_psr_sink_crc.c
> > @@ -290,7 +290,7 @@ static bool drrs_disabled(data_t *data)
> >  
> >  	igt_debugfs_read(data->drm_fd, "i915_drrs_status", buf);
> >  
> > -	return strstr(buf, "DRRS Support: No\n");
> > +	return !strstr(buf, "DRRS Supported: Yes\n");


Neat and simple. Please send a patch to change the debugfs output that
Rodrigo pointed out.

> >  }
> >  
> >  static void run_test(data_t *data)
> > -- 
> > 2.9.3
> > 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx