[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 3/8] drm/i915: Create uC runtime and system suspend/resume helpers

Sagar Arun Kamble sagar.a.kamble at intel.com
Sat Sep 23 12:23:04 UTC 2017


Prepared generic helpers intel_uc_suspend, intel_uc_resume,
intel_uc_runtime_suspend, intel_uc_runtime_resume. These are
called from respective GEM functions.

v2: Rebase w.r.t removal of GuC code restructuring.

v3: Calling intel_uc_resume from i915_gem_resume post resuming
i915 gem setup. This is symmetrical with i915_gem_suspend.
Removed error messages from i915 suspend/resume routines as
uC suspend/resume routines will have those. (Michal Wajdeczko)
Declare wedged on uc_suspend failure and uc_resume failure.
(Michał Winiarski)
Added DRM_DEBUG message about skipping changes in intel_uc_resume.
Keeping the uC suspend/resume function definitions close to other
uC functions.

Cc: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko at intel.com>
Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski at intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble at intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c |  1 -
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h |  4 ++++
 4 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
index aa70142..bd70445 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
@@ -2518,7 +2518,6 @@ static int intel_runtime_suspend(struct device *kdev)
 		DRM_ERROR("Runtime suspend failed, disabling it (%d)\n", ret);
 		intel_runtime_pm_enable_interrupts(dev_priv);
 
-		intel_guc_resume(dev_priv);
 		i915_gem_runtime_resume(dev_priv);
 		enable_rpm_wakeref_asserts(dev_priv);
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
index ff1131c..581f3a4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -2034,9 +2034,11 @@ int i915_gem_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 int i915_gem_runtime_suspend(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 {
 	struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, *on;
-	int i;
+	int i, ret;
 
-	intel_guc_suspend(dev_priv);
+	ret = intel_uc_runtime_suspend(dev_priv);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
 
 	/*
 	 * Only called during RPM suspend. All users of the userfault_list
@@ -2077,7 +2079,7 @@ int i915_gem_runtime_suspend(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 		reg->dirty = true;
 	}
 
-	return 0;
+	return ret;
 }
 
 /**
@@ -2097,9 +2099,7 @@ int i915_gem_runtime_resume(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 	i915_gem_init_swizzling(dev_priv);
 	i915_gem_restore_fences(dev_priv);
 
-	intel_guc_resume(dev_priv);
-
-	return 0;
+	return intel_uc_runtime_resume(dev_priv);
 }
 
 static int i915_gem_object_create_mmap_offset(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
@@ -4600,7 +4600,9 @@ int i915_gem_suspend(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 	if (WARN_ON(!intel_engines_are_idle(dev_priv)))
 		i915_gem_set_wedged(dev_priv); /* no hope, discard everything */
 
-	intel_guc_suspend(dev_priv);
+	ret = intel_uc_suspend(dev_priv);
+	if (ret)
+		i915_gem_set_wedged(dev_priv); /* no hope, discard everything */
 
 	/*
 	 * Neither the BIOS, ourselves or any other kernel
@@ -4644,6 +4646,7 @@ int i915_gem_suspend(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 int i915_gem_resume(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 {
 	struct drm_device *dev = &dev_priv->drm;
+	int ret;
 
 	WARN_ON(dev_priv->gt.awake);
 
@@ -4656,10 +4659,21 @@ int i915_gem_resume(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 	 * it and start again.
 	 */
 	dev_priv->gt.resume(dev_priv);
-	intel_guc_resume(dev_priv);
+
+	/*
+	 * NB: Full gem reinitialization is being done in i915_drm_resume
+	 * after gem_resume, so currently intel_uc_resume will be of no use.
+	 * Hence, intel_uc_resume is nop currently. If full reinitialization is
+	 * removed, will need to put functionality to resume from sleep in
+	 * intel_uc_resume.
+	 */
+	ret = intel_uc_resume(dev_priv);
+	if (ret)
+		i915_gem_set_wedged(dev_priv);
+
 	mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
 
-	return 0;
+	return ret;
 }
 
 void i915_gem_init_swizzling(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c
index 9018540..c3e9477 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c
@@ -460,6 +460,28 @@ void intel_uc_fini_hw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 	i915_ggtt_disable_guc(dev_priv);
 }
 
+int intel_uc_runtime_suspend(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
+{
+	return intel_guc_suspend(dev_priv);
+}
+
+int intel_uc_runtime_resume(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
+{
+	return intel_guc_resume(dev_priv);
+}
+
+int intel_uc_suspend(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
+{
+	return intel_guc_suspend(dev_priv);
+}
+
+int intel_uc_resume(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
+{
+	DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("uC resume does nothing as full reinit is done\n");
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 int intel_guc_send_nop(struct intel_guc *guc, const u32 *action, u32 len)
 {
 	WARN(1, "Unexpected send: action=%#x\n", *action);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h
index 7703c9a..3d33a51 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h
@@ -208,6 +208,10 @@ struct intel_huc {
 void intel_uc_fini_fw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
 int intel_uc_init_hw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
 void intel_uc_fini_hw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
+int intel_uc_runtime_suspend(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
+int intel_uc_runtime_resume(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
+int intel_uc_suspend(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
+int intel_uc_resume(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
 int intel_guc_sample_forcewake(struct intel_guc *guc);
 int intel_guc_send_nop(struct intel_guc *guc, const u32 *action, u32 len);
 int intel_guc_send_mmio(struct intel_guc *guc, const u32 *action, u32 len);
-- 
1.9.1



More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list