[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/dp: Add defines for latency in sink
Rodrigo Vivi
rodrigo.vivi at intel.com
Mon Sep 25 17:05:21 UTC 2017
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 09:01:38AM +0000, vathsala nagaraju wrote:
> On Monday 25 September 2017 01:53 PM, Jani Nikula wrote:
>
> On Sat, 23 Sep 2017, vathsala nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju at intel.com> wrote:
>
> Add defines for dpcd register 2009 (synchronization latency
> in sink).
>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
> CC: Puthikorn Voravootivat <puthik at chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju at intel.com>
> ---
> include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h b/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h
> index 11c39f1..846004e6 100644
> --- a/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h
> +++ b/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h
> @@ -735,6 +735,9 @@
> # define DP_PSR_SINK_INTERNAL_ERROR 7
> # define DP_PSR_SINK_STATE_MASK 0x07
>
> +#define DP_SINK_SYNCHRONIZATION_LATENCY 0x2009
> +# define DP_MAX_RESYNC_FRAME_CNT_MASK 0xf
>
> For the DP spec, please don't invent the names, use the ones from the
> spec. At most drop excess stuff from the end.
>
> In edp 1.4b spec , the register name 2009 is "DEBUG 0 SYNCHRONIZATION LATENCY SINK " and
> bit 0:3 "MAX RE-SYNC FRAME COUNT"
probably he meant something like:
# define DP_SYNCHRONIZATION_LATENCY_IN_SINK 0x2009
# define DP_MAX_RESYNC_FRAME_COUNT_MASK 0xf
but he is the best one to confirm that...
>
>
> #define DP_SYNCHRONIZATION_LATENCY_IN_SINK
> # define DP_MAX_RESYNC_FRAME_COUNT_SHIFT
> # define DP_MAX_RESYNC_FRAME_COUNT_MASK
>
> And while at it, please add the full register contents.
>
> BR,
> Jani.
>
>
> +
> #define DP_RECEIVER_ALPM_STATUS 0x200b /* eDP 1.4 */
> # define DP_ALPM_LOCK_TIMEOUT_ERROR (1 << 0)
>
>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list