[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: Extend WaDisableIPC to all platforms.

[Rodrigo Vivi]

On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 07:02:59PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Rodrigo Vivi (2017-09-28 19:51:48)
> > Although Bspec state this Workaround is only relevant for SKL:All.
> > 
> > The wa_database state this is needed for All platforms from SKL to CNL.
> > 
> > So let's pick the safest case.
> > 
> > Cc: Mahesh Kumar <mahesh1.kumar at intel.com>
> > Cc: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 4 ++--
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > index ede871b7982e..27f9d5ab2d23 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > @@ -5828,8 +5828,8 @@ void intel_enable_ipc(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> >  {
> >         u32 val;
> >  
> > -       /* Display WA #0477 WaDisableIPC: skl */
> > -       if (IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv)) {
> > +       /* Display WA #0477 WaDisableIPC: skl,kbl,bxt,glk,cfl,cnl */
> > +       if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) <= 10) {
> 
> But at that point, why not just define has_ipc as a gen10 feature?

it's already there...

> You
> can have a comment before gen9 feature that although IPC was introduced
> for gen9, it is recommended (w/a) to leave disabled.

so you mean moving this Wa from here to set has_ipc = 0 to all platforms?

Anyways I'd like to hear from Manesh about it since this basically revert
all IPC work for all platforms...

> -Chris