[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/2] trace: Default to using trace_global_clock if sched_clock is unstable

[Chris Wilson]

Quoting Chris Wilson (2018-03-30 16:01:31)
> Across suspend, we may see a very large drift in timestamps if the sched
> clock is unstable, prompting the global trace's ringbuffer code to warn
> and suggest switching to the global clock. Preempt this request by
> detecting when the sched clock is unstable (determined during
> late_initcall) and automatically switching the default clock over to
> trace_global_clock.
> 
> This should prevent requiring user interaction to resolve warnings such
> as:
> 
>     Delta way too big! 18446743856563626466 ts=18446744054496180323 write stamp = 197932553857
>     If you just came from a suspend/resume,
>     please switch to the trace global clock:
>     echo global > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace_clock
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt at goodmis.org>
> ---
> v2: Tell the user what's happening and what they can do to correct it.
> ---
>  kernel/trace/trace.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c
> index 13baf85b27d8..7c155fa879e1 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
> @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@
>  #include <linux/nmi.h>
>  #include <linux/fs.h>
>  #include <linux/trace.h>
> +#include <linux/sched/clock.h>
>  #include <linux/sched/rt.h>
>  
>  #include "trace.h"
> @@ -8505,3 +8506,21 @@ __init static int clear_boot_tracer(void)
>  
>  fs_initcall(tracer_init_tracefs);
>  late_initcall_sync(clear_boot_tracer);
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_UNSTABLE_SCHED_CLOCK
> +__init static int tracing_set_default_clock(void)
> +{
> +       /* sched_clock_stable() is determined in late_initcall */
> +       if (trace_boot_clock || sched_clock_stable()) {

Oh flip, I reversed the logic from v1.

I was going to do an early return:

	if (trace_boot_clock || sched_clock_stable())
		return;

to shift the message to the left slightly, at left it half way.

(I was wondering why CI didn't show the same results as v1!)
-Chris