[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 7/7] drm/i915/dp: fix compliance test adjustments
Jani Nikula
jani.nikula at intel.com
Thu Apr 5 14:39:05 UTC 2018
Abstract compliance test adjustments to a single function. Also make the
bpc adjustments affect the limits, actually forcing the bpc. Seems like
directly changing the pipe_bpp in the past could not have been
effective.
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
index c98626b3af65..4ddb9dc61f46 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
@@ -1666,14 +1666,6 @@ static int intel_dp_compute_bpp(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
if (bpc > 0)
bpp = min(bpp, 3*bpc);
- /* For DP Compliance we override the computed bpp for the pipe */
- if (intel_dp->compliance.test_data.bpc != 0) {
- pipe_config->pipe_bpp = 3*intel_dp->compliance.test_data.bpc;
- pipe_config->dither_force_disable = pipe_config->pipe_bpp == 6*3;
- DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Setting pipe_bpp to %d\n",
- pipe_config->pipe_bpp);
- }
-
if (intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp)) {
/* Get bpp from vbt only for panels that dont have bpp in edid */
if (intel_connector->base.display_info.bpc == 0 &&
@@ -1704,6 +1696,42 @@ static bool intel_edp_compare_alt_mode(struct drm_display_mode *m1,
return bres;
}
+/* Adjust link config limits based on compliance test requests. */
+static void
+intel_dp_adjust_compliance_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
+ struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config,
+ struct link_config_limits *limits)
+{
+ /* For DP Compliance we override the computed bpp for the pipe */
+ if (intel_dp->compliance.test_data.bpc != 0) {
+ int bpp = 3 * intel_dp->compliance.test_data.bpc;
+
+ limits->min_bpp = limits->max_bpp = bpp;
+ pipe_config->dither_force_disable = bpp == 6 * 3;
+
+ DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Setting pipe_bpp to %d\n", bpp);
+ }
+
+ /* Use values requested by Compliance Test Request */
+ if (intel_dp->compliance.test_type == DP_TEST_LINK_TRAINING) {
+ int index;
+
+ /* Validate the compliance test data since max values
+ * might have changed due to link train fallback.
+ */
+ if (intel_dp_link_params_valid(intel_dp, intel_dp->compliance.test_link_rate,
+ intel_dp->compliance.test_lane_count)) {
+ index = intel_dp_rate_index(intel_dp->common_rates,
+ intel_dp->num_common_rates,
+ intel_dp->compliance.test_link_rate);
+ if (index >= 0)
+ limits->min_clock = limits->max_clock = index;
+ limits->min_lane_count = limits->max_lane_count =
+ intel_dp->compliance.test_lane_count;
+ }
+ }
+}
+
/* Optimize link config in order: max bpp, min clock, min lanes */
static bool
intel_dp_compute_link_config_wide(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
@@ -1764,24 +1792,6 @@ intel_dp_compute_link_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
limits.min_bpp = 6 * 3;
limits.max_bpp = intel_dp_compute_bpp(intel_dp, pipe_config);
- /* Use values requested by Compliance Test Request */
- if (intel_dp->compliance.test_type == DP_TEST_LINK_TRAINING) {
- int index;
-
- /* Validate the compliance test data since max values
- * might have changed due to link train fallback.
- */
- if (intel_dp_link_params_valid(intel_dp, intel_dp->compliance.test_link_rate,
- intel_dp->compliance.test_lane_count)) {
- index = intel_dp_rate_index(intel_dp->common_rates,
- intel_dp->num_common_rates,
- intel_dp->compliance.test_link_rate);
- if (index >= 0)
- limits.min_clock = limits.max_clock = index;
- limits.min_lane_count = limits.max_lane_count = intel_dp->compliance.test_lane_count;
- }
- }
-
if (intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp)) {
/*
* Use the maximum clock and number of lanes the eDP panel
@@ -1794,6 +1804,8 @@ intel_dp_compute_link_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
limits.min_clock = limits.max_clock;
}
+ intel_dp_adjust_compliance_config(intel_dp, pipe_config, &limits);
+
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("DP link computation with max lane count %i "
"max rate %d max bpp %d pixel clock %iKHz\n",
limits.max_lane_count,
--
2.11.0
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list