[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Split out parking from the idle worker for reuse

[Chris Wilson]

We will want to park GEM before disengaging the drive^W^W^W unwedging.
Since we already do the work for idling, expose the guts as a new
function that we can then reuse.

v2: Just skip if already parked; makes it more forgiving to use by
future callers.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko at intel.com>
Cc: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble at intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala at linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala at linux.intel.com>
---
Even with the follow up patch on hold, I think this will be useful when
we figure out the right order of operations in reset and stands by itself
as an improvement.

Any objections to pushing this by itself?
-Chris
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
index 9650a7b10c5f..134529598a84 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -136,6 +136,46 @@ int i915_mutex_lock_interruptible(struct drm_device *dev)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static u32 i915_gem_park(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
+{
+	lockdep_assert_held(&i915->drm.struct_mutex);
+	GEM_BUG_ON(i915->gt.active_requests);
+
+	if (!i915->gt.awake)
+		return I915_EPOCH_INVALID;
+
+	GEM_BUG_ON(i915->gt.epoch == I915_EPOCH_INVALID);
+
+	/*
+	 * Be paranoid and flush a concurrent interrupt to make sure
+	 * we don't reactivate any irq tasklets after parking.
+	 *
+	 * FIXME: Note that even though we have waited for execlists to be idle,
+	 * there may still be an in-flight interrupt even though the CSB
+	 * is now empty. synchronize_irq() makes sure that a residual interrupt
+	 * is completed before we continue, but it doesn't prevent the HW from
+	 * raising a spurious interrupt later. To complete the shield we should
+	 * coordinate disabling the CS irq with flushing the interrupts.
+	 */
+	synchronize_irq(i915->drm.irq);
+
+	intel_engines_park(i915);
+	i915_gem_timelines_park(i915);
+
+	i915_pmu_gt_parked(i915);
+
+	i915->gt.awake = false;
+
+	if (INTEL_GEN(i915) >= 6)
+		gen6_rps_idle(i915);
+
+	intel_display_power_put(i915, POWER_DOMAIN_GT_IRQ);
+
+	intel_runtime_pm_put(i915);
+
+	return i915->gt.epoch;
+}
+
 int
 i915_gem_get_aperture_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
 			    struct drm_file *file)
@@ -3496,36 +3536,9 @@ i915_gem_idle_work_handler(struct work_struct *work)
 	if (new_requests_since_last_retire(dev_priv))
 		goto out_unlock;
 
-	/*
-	 * Be paranoid and flush a concurrent interrupt to make sure
-	 * we don't reactivate any irq tasklets after parking.
-	 *
-	 * FIXME: Note that even though we have waited for execlists to be idle,
-	 * there may still be an in-flight interrupt even though the CSB
-	 * is now empty. synchronize_irq() makes sure that a residual interrupt
-	 * is completed before we continue, but it doesn't prevent the HW from
-	 * raising a spurious interrupt later. To complete the shield we should
-	 * coordinate disabling the CS irq with flushing the interrupts.
-	 */
-	synchronize_irq(dev_priv->drm.irq);
-
-	intel_engines_park(dev_priv);
-	i915_gem_timelines_park(dev_priv);
+	epoch = i915_gem_park(dev_priv);
 
-	i915_pmu_gt_parked(dev_priv);
-
-	GEM_BUG_ON(!dev_priv->gt.awake);
-	dev_priv->gt.awake = false;
-	epoch = dev_priv->gt.epoch;
-	GEM_BUG_ON(epoch == I915_EPOCH_INVALID);
 	rearm_hangcheck = false;
-
-	if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 6)
-		gen6_rps_idle(dev_priv);
-
-	intel_display_power_put(dev_priv, POWER_DOMAIN_GT_IRQ);
-
-	intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv);
 out_unlock:
 	mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->drm.struct_mutex);
 
-- 
2.17.0