[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [CI,1/2] drm/i915: Move a bunch of workaround-related code to its own file

[Patchwork]

== Series Details ==

Series: series starting with [CI,1/2] drm/i915: Move a bunch of workaround-related code to its own file
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/41586/
State : warning

== Summary ==

$ dim checkpatch origin/drm-tip
e95c3b723634 drm/i915: Move a bunch of workaround-related code to its own file
-:745: WARNING:FILE_PATH_CHANGES: added, moved or deleted file(s), does MAINTAINERS need updating?
#745: 
new file mode 100644

-:818: WARNING:MACRO_WITH_FLOW_CONTROL: Macros with flow control statements should be avoided
#818: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_workarounds.c:69:
+#define WA_REG(addr, mask, val) do { \
+		const int r = wa_add(dev_priv, (addr), (mask), (val)); \
+		if (r) \
+			return r; \
+	} while (0)

-:824: CHECK:MACRO_ARG_REUSE: Macro argument reuse 'mask' - possible side-effects?
#824: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_workarounds.c:75:
+#define WA_SET_BIT_MASKED(addr, mask) \
+	WA_REG(addr, (mask), _MASKED_BIT_ENABLE(mask))

-:827: CHECK:MACRO_ARG_REUSE: Macro argument reuse 'mask' - possible side-effects?
#827: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_workarounds.c:78:
+#define WA_CLR_BIT_MASKED(addr, mask) \
+	WA_REG(addr, (mask), _MASKED_BIT_DISABLE(mask))

-:830: CHECK:MACRO_ARG_REUSE: Macro argument reuse 'mask' - possible side-effects?
#830: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_workarounds.c:81:
+#define WA_SET_FIELD_MASKED(addr, mask, value) \
+	WA_REG(addr, (mask), _MASKED_FIELD(mask, value))

total: 0 errors, 2 warnings, 3 checks, 1383 lines checked
8780063884cc drm/i915: Split out functions for different kinds of workarounds