[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 1/2] drm/i915: Implement WaProgramMgsrForCorrectSliceSpecificMmioReads
Oscar Mateo
oscar.mateo at intel.com
Wed Apr 18 16:30:41 UTC 2018
On 4/17/2018 3:58 PM, Yunwei Zhang wrote:
> WaProgramMgsrForCorrectSliceSpecificMmioReads dictate that before any MMIO
> read into Slice/Subslice specific registers, MCR packet control
> register(0xFDC) needs to be programmed to point to any enabled
> slice/subslice pair. Otherwise, incorrect value will be returned.
>
> However, that means each subsequent MMIO read will be forwarded to a
> specific slice/subslice combination as read is unicast. This is OK since
> slice/subslice specific register values are consistent in almost all cases
> across slice/subslice. There are rare occasions such as INSTDONE that this
> value will be dependent on slice/subslice combo, in such cases, we need to
> program 0xFDC and recover this after. This is already covered by
> read_subslice_reg.
>
> Also, 0xFDC will lose its information after TDR/engine reset/power state
> change.
>
> References: HSD#1405586840, BSID#0575
>
> v2:
> - use fls() instead of find_last_bit() (Chris)
> - added INTEL_SSEU to extract sseu from device info. (Chris)
> v3:
> - rebase on latest tip
> v5:
> - Added references (Mika)
> - Change the ordered of passing arguments and etc. (Ursulin)
> v7:
> - Rebased.
> v8:
> - Reviewed by Oscar
> - Store default MCR value instead of calculate on the run. (Oscar)
> v9:
> - Changed naming and label fixes. (Oscar)
> - Store only the selector instead of whole MCR. (Oscar)
>
> Cc: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo at intel.com>
> Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry at intel.com>
> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen at linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala at linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yunwei Zhang <yunwei.zhang at intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h | 3 +++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c | 14 ++++++++-----
> 3 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
> index a32ba72..1a4288f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
> @@ -719,6 +719,39 @@ static u32 read_timestamp_frequency(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static void sanitize_mcr(struct intel_device_info *info)
> +{
> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv =
> + container_of(info, struct drm_i915_private, info);
> + u32 mcr;
> + u32 mcr_slice_subslice_mask;
> + u32 mcr_slice_subslice_select;
> + u32 slice = fls(info->sseu.slice_mask);
> + u32 subslice = fls(info->sseu.subslice_mask[slice]);
> +
> + if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11) {
> + mcr_slice_subslice_mask = GEN11_MCR_SLICE_MASK |
> + GEN11_MCR_SUBSLICE_MASK;
> + mcr_slice_subslice_select = GEN11_MCR_SLICE(slice) |
> + GEN11_MCR_SUBSLICE(subslice);
> + } else {
> + mcr_slice_subslice_mask = GEN8_MCR_SLICE_MASK |
> + GEN8_MCR_SUBSLICE_MASK;
> + mcr_slice_subslice_select = GEN8_MCR_SLICE(slice) |
> + GEN8_MCR_SUBSLICE(subslice);
> + }
> +
> + mcr = I915_READ(GEN8_MCR_SELECTOR);
> + mcr &= ~mcr_slice_subslice_mask;
> +
> + /* WaProgramMgsrForCorrectSliceSpecificMmioReads:cnl,icl */
> + if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 10)
> + mcr |= mcr_slice_subslice_select;
Blank line here. The I915_WRITE is both for the WA and for the
sanitation of the register.
> + I915_WRITE(GEN8_MCR_SELECTOR, mcr);
> +
> + info->default_mcr_ss_select = mcr_slice_subslice_select;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * intel_device_info_runtime_init - initialize runtime info
> * @info: intel device info struct
> @@ -851,6 +884,8 @@ void intel_device_info_runtime_init(struct intel_device_info *info)
> else if (INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->gen >= 11)
> gen11_sseu_info_init(dev_priv);
>
> + sanitize_mcr(info);
> +
> /* Initialize command stream timestamp frequency */
> info->cs_timestamp_frequency_khz = read_timestamp_frequency(dev_priv);
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h
> index 933e316..2c47a62 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h
> @@ -176,6 +176,9 @@ struct intel_device_info {
> /* Slice/subslice/EU info */
> struct sseu_dev_info sseu;
>
> + /* default selected slice/subslice in MCR packet control */
> + u32 default_mcr_ss_select;
> +
default_mcr_s_ss_select? (yes, I know we are not coherent with the
meaning of 's' and 'ss' in many other places).
> u32 cs_timestamp_frequency_khz;
>
> struct color_luts {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c
> index 1a83707..1ba2826 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c
> @@ -831,18 +831,22 @@ read_subslice_reg(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, int slice,
> intel_uncore_forcewake_get__locked(dev_priv, fw_domains);
>
> mcr = I915_READ_FW(GEN8_MCR_SELECTOR);
> - /*
> - * The HW expects the slice and sublice selectors to be reset to 0
> - * after reading out the registers.
> - */
> - WARN_ON_ONCE(mcr & mcr_slice_subslice_mask);
> +
> + WARN_ON_ONCE((mcr & mcr_slice_subslice_mask) !=
> + dev_priv->info.default_mcr_ss_select);
> mcr &= ~mcr_slice_subslice_mask;
> mcr |= mcr_slice_subslice_select;
> I915_WRITE_FW(GEN8_MCR_SELECTOR, mcr);
>
> ret = I915_READ_FW(reg);
>
> + /*
> + * HW expects MCR to be programed to a enabled slice/subslice pair
> + * before any MMIO read into slice/subslice register
> + */
The comment above makes more sense in sanitize_mcr, together with the WA
label. You can make it a bit more verbose with the info in the commit
message. Something like this:
/*
* WaProgramMgsrForCorrectSliceSpecificMmioReads:cnl,icl
* Before any MMIO read into slice/subslice specific registers, MCR
* packet control register needs to be programmed to point to any
* enabled s/ss pair. Otherwise, incorrect values will be returned.
* This means each subsequent MMIO read will be forwarded to an
* specific s/ss combination, but this is OK since these registers
* are consistent across s/ss in almost all cases. In the rare
* occasions, such as INSTDONE, where this value is dependent
* on s/ss combo, the read shoud be done with read_subslice_reg.
*/
I don't think any other comment is required here.
> mcr &= ~mcr_slice_subslice_mask;
> + mcr |= dev_priv->info.default_mcr_ss_select;
> +
> I915_WRITE_FW(GEN8_MCR_SELECTOR, mcr);
>
> intel_uncore_forcewake_put__locked(dev_priv, fw_domains);
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list