[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/psr : Add psr1 live status
Souza, Jose
jose.souza at intel.com
Fri Apr 20 17:14:52 UTC 2018
On Fri, 2018-04-20 at 15:06 +0530, vathsala nagaraju wrote:
> From: Vathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju at intel.com>
>
> Prints live state of psr1.Extending the existing
> PSR2 live state function to cover psr1.
>
> Tested on KBL with psr2 and psr1 panel.
>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan at intel.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Vathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> ----------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> index e0274f4..3056f04 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> @@ -2580,25 +2580,42 @@ static int i915_guc_log_relay_release(struct
> inode *inode, struct file *file)
> .release = i915_guc_log_relay_release,
> };
>
> -static const char *psr2_live_status(u32 val)
> -{
> - static const char * const live_status[] = {
> - "IDLE",
> - "CAPTURE",
> - "CAPTURE_FS",
> - "SLEEP",
> - "BUFON_FW",
> - "ML_UP",
> - "SU_STANDBY",
> - "FAST_SLEEP",
> - "DEEP_SLEEP",
> - "BUF_ON",
> - "TG_ON"
> - };
> -
> - val = (val & EDP_PSR2_STATUS_STATE_MASK) >>
> EDP_PSR2_STATUS_STATE_SHIFT;
> - if (val < ARRAY_SIZE(live_status))
> - return live_status[val];
> +static const char *psr_live_status(bool is_psr2_enabled, u32 val)
> +{
> + if (is_psr2_enabled) {
> + static const char * const live_status[] = {
> + "IDLE",
> + "CAPTURE",
> + "CAPTURE_FS",
> + "SLEEP",
> + "BUFON_FW",
> + "ML_UP",
> + "SU_STANDBY",
> + "FAST_SLEEP",
> + "DEEP_SLEEP",
> + "BUF_ON",
> + "TG_ON"
> + };
> + val = (val & EDP_PSR2_STATUS_STATE_MASK) >>
> + EDP_PSR2_STATUS_STATE_SHIFT;
> + if (val < ARRAY_SIZE(live_status))
> + return live_status[val];
> + } else {
> + static const char * const live_status[] = {
> + "IDLE",
> + "SRDONACK",
> + "SRDENT",
> + "BUFOFF",
> + "BUFON",
> + "AUXACK",
> + "SRDOFFACK",
> + "SRDENT_ON",
> + };
> + val = (val & EDP_PSR_STATUS_STATE_MASK) >>
> + EDP_PSR_STATUS_STATE_SHIFT;
> + if (val < ARRAY_SIZE(live_status))
> + return live_status[val];
> + }
>
> return "unknown";
> }
> @@ -2611,6 +2628,7 @@ static int i915_edp_psr_status(struct seq_file
> *m, void *data)
> enum pipe pipe;
> bool enabled = false;
> bool sink_support;
> + u32 psr_status;
>
> if (!HAS_PSR(dev_priv))
> return -ENODEV;
> @@ -2678,12 +2696,14 @@ static int i915_edp_psr_status(struct
> seq_file *m, void *data)
>
> seq_printf(m, "Performance_Counter: %u\n", psrperf);
> }
> - if (dev_priv->psr.psr2_enabled) {
> - u32 psr2 = I915_READ(EDP_PSR2_STATUS);
>
> - seq_printf(m, "EDP_PSR2_STATUS: %x [%s]\n",
> - psr2, psr2_live_status(psr2));
> - }
> + psr_status = (dev_priv->psr.psr2_enabled) ?
> I915_READ(EDP_PSR2_STATUS) :
> + I915_READ(EDP_PS
> R_STATUS);
Maybe move the read of the PSR or PSR2 status to inside of
psr_live_status()
Other than that looks good to me.
> + seq_printf(m, "EDP_PSR%s_STATUS: %x [%s]\n",
> + dev_priv->psr.psr2_enabled ? "2" : "1",
> + psr_status,
> + psr_live_status(dev_priv->psr.psr2_enabled,
> psr_status));
> +
> mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
>
> intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> index fb10602..c9598b4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> @@ -4058,6 +4058,7 @@ enum {
> #define EDP_PSR_STATUS_SENDING_TP2_TP3 (1<<8)
> #define EDP_PSR_STATUS_SENDING_TP1 (1<<4)
> #define EDP_PSR_STATUS_IDLE_MASK 0xf
> +#define EDP_PSR_STATUS_STATE_SHIFT 29
>
> #define EDP_PSR_PERF_CNT _MMIO(dev_priv-
> >psr_mmio_base + 0x44)
> #define EDP_PSR_PERF_CNT_MASK 0xffffff
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list