[Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] [PATCH igt] test/gem_exec_schedule: Check each engine is an independent timeline
Antonio Argenziano
antonio.argenziano at intel.com
Mon Apr 23 15:37:17 UTC 2018
On 23/04/18 06:43, Chris Wilson wrote:
> In the existing ABI, each engine operates its own timeline
> (fence.context) and so should execute independently of any other. If we
> install a blocker on all other engines, that should not affect execution
> on the local engine.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
> +static void independent(int fd, unsigned int engine)
> +{
> + IGT_CORK_HANDLE(cork);
> + uint32_t scratch, plug, batch;
> + igt_spin_t *spin = NULL;
> + unsigned int other;
> + uint32_t *ptr;
> +
> + igt_require(engine != 0);
> +
> + scratch = gem_create(fd, 4096);
> + plug = igt_cork_plug(&cork, fd);
> +
> + /* Check that we can submit to engine while all others are blocked */
> + for_each_physical_engine(fd, other) {
> + if (other == engine)
> + continue;
> +
> + if (spin == NULL) {
> + spin = __igt_spin_batch_new(fd, 0, other, 0);
> + } else {
> + struct drm_i915_gem_exec_object2 obj = {
> + .handle = spin->handle,
> + };
> + struct drm_i915_gem_execbuffer2 eb = {
> + .buffer_count = 1,
> + .buffers_ptr = to_user_pointer(&obj),
> + .flags = other,
> + };
> + gem_execbuf(fd, &eb);
> + }
> +
> + store_dword(fd, 0, other, scratch, 0, other, plug, 0);
> + }
> + igt_require(spin);
> +
> + /* Same priority, but different timeline (as different engine) */
> + batch = __store_dword(fd, 0, engine, scratch, 0, engine, plug, 0);
It would be interesting to check that priority scheduling/preemption is
still happening on the free engine.
> +
> + unplug_show_queue(fd, &cork, engine);
> + gem_close(fd, plug);
> +
> + gem_sync(fd, batch);
> + gem_close(fd, batch);
> + igt_assert(gem_bo_busy(fd, spin->handle));
> +
> + ptr = gem_mmap__gtt(fd, scratch, 4096, PROT_READ);
> + gem_close(fd, scratch);
> + igt_assert_eq(ptr[0], engine);
> +
> + igt_spin_batch_free(fd, spin);
> + gem_quiescent_gpu(fd);
> +
> + /* And we expect the others to have overwritten us, order unspecified */
> + igt_assert_neq(ptr[0], engine);
> + munmap(ptr, 4096);
> +}
> +
> static void smoketest(int fd, unsigned ring, unsigned timeout)
> {
> const int ncpus = sysconf(_SC_NPROCESSORS_ONLN);
> @@ -1070,10 +1138,16 @@ igt_main
> if (e->exec_id == 0)
> continue;
>
> - igt_subtest_f("fifo-%s", e->name) {
> - igt_require(gem_ring_has_physical_engine(fd, e->exec_id | e->flags));
> - igt_require(gem_can_store_dword(fd, e->exec_id) | e->flags);
> - fifo(fd, e->exec_id | e->flags);
> + igt_subtest_group {
> + igt_fixture {
> + igt_require(gem_ring_has_physical_engine(fd, e->exec_id | e->flags));
I thought that we added this to the subtests to have a constant list of
tests for all platforms.
Thanks,
Antonio
> + igt_require(gem_can_store_dword(fd, e->exec_id) | e->flags);
> + }
> +
> + igt_subtest_f("fifo-%s", e->name)
> + fifo(fd, e->exec_id | e->flags);
> + igt_subtest_f("independent-%s", e->name)
> + independent(fd, e->exec_id | e->flags);
> }
> }
> }
>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list