[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 3/4] drm/i915/debugfs: Print sink PSR status
Souza, Jose
jose.souza at intel.com
Wed Apr 25 20:33:18 UTC 2018
On Tue, 2018-04-24 at 17:18 -0700, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 2018-04-20 at 15:27 -0700, José Roberto de Souza wrote:
> > IGT tests could be improved with sink status, knowing for sure that
> > hardware have activate or exit PSR.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan at intel.com>
> > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza at intel.com>
> > ---
> >
> > No changes since v2, Dhinakaran asked to not merge this patch in v2
> > because reading i915_edp_psr_status was causing PSR to exit but now
> > with 'drm/i915/psr: Prevent PSR exit when a non-pipe related
> > register
> > is written' it is fixed.
> >
>
> Do you mind adding "reading i915_edp_psr_status was causing PSR to
> exit
> but now with 'drm/i915/psr: Prevent PSR exit when a non-pipe related
> register is written' it is fixed." to the commit message?
Done
>
>
>
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 29
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> > index 2f05f5262bba..536d93322451 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> > @@ -2603,6 +2603,26 @@ static const char *psr2_live_status(u32 val)
> > return "unknown";
> > }
> >
> > +static const char *psr_sink_status(u8 val)
> > +{
> > + static const char * const sink_status[] = {
> > + "inactive",
> > + "transition to active, capture and display",
> > + "active, display from RFB",
> > + "active, capture and display on sink device
> > timings",
> > + "transition to inactive, capture and display,
> > timing re-sync",
> > + "reserved",
> > + "reserved",
> > + "sink internal error"
> > + };
> > +
> > + val &= DP_PSR_SINK_STATE_MASK;
> > + if (val < ARRAY_SIZE(sink_status))
> > + return sink_status[val];
> > +
> > + return "unknown";
> > +}
> > +
> > static int i915_edp_psr_status(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
> > {
> > struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = node_to_i915(m-
> > >private);
> > @@ -2684,6 +2704,15 @@ static int i915_edp_psr_status(struct
> > seq_file *m, void *data)
> > seq_printf(m, "EDP_PSR2_STATUS: %x [%s]\n",
> > psr2, psr2_live_status(psr2));
> > }
> > +
> > + if (dev_priv->psr.enabled) {
> > + struct drm_dp_aux *aux = &dev_priv->psr.enabled-
> > >aux;
> > + u8 val;
> > +
> > + if (drm_dp_dpcd_readb(aux, DP_PSR_STATUS, &val) ==
> > 1)
> > + seq_printf(m, "Sink PSR status: 0x%x
> > [%s]\n", val,
> > + psr_sink_status(val));
> > + }
> > mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
> >
> > if (READ_ONCE(dev_priv->psr.debug)) {
>
>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list