[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: remove check for aux irq

[Ville Syrjälä]

On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 08:42:54AM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 06:27:26PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 08:22:12AM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 04:43:38PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 02:55:24PM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> > > > > This became dead code with commit 309bd8ed464f ("drm/i915: Reinstate
> > > > > GMBUS and AUX interrupts on gen4/g4x").
> > > > > 
> > > > > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi at intel.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h  |  3 +--
> > > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c  | 22 +++++++---------------
> > > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h |  1 -
> > > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c |  2 +-
> > > > >  4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> > > > > 
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > > > > index 8444ca8d5aa3..09e1c2289ea1 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > > > > @@ -2545,7 +2545,7 @@ intel_info(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> > > > >  	 IS_SKL_GT3(dev_priv) || IS_SKL_GT4(dev_priv))
> > > > >  
> > > > >  /*
> > > > > - * dp aux and gmbus irq on gen4 seems to be able to generate legacy interrupts
> > > > > + * gmbus irq on gen4 seems to be able to generate legacy interrupts
> > > > 
> > > > Why are you removing vital information from the comment?
> > > 
> > > Because it wouldn't match the code anymore. We always use aux irq.
> > 
> > The comment is documenting the hardware behaviour. We don't want to lose
> > that information.
> 
> IMO it's confusing to have the comment saying one thing and then code
> not following it. Reading it again I see the second paragraph you added
> actually document the code and the first the HW behavior. Maybe starting
> the second paragraph with a "However" would make it clearer.  Or I can just
> drop this change in the comment.

Or you can move the relevant parts of the comment to the place where
we do the "MSI or not to MSI" decision.

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel