[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v12 07/10] drm: Handle aspect ratio info in legacy modeset path
Nautiyal, Ankit K
ankit.k.nautiyal at intel.com
Mon Apr 30 06:21:29 UTC 2018
On 4/27/2018 7:24 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 05:44:53PM +0530, Nautiyal, Ankit K wrote:
>> From: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal at intel.com>
>>
>> If the user-space does not support aspect-ratio, and requests for a
>> modeset with mode having aspect ratio bits set, then the given
>> user-mode must be rejected. Secondly, while preparing a user-mode from
>> kernel mode, the aspect-ratio info must not be given, if aspect-ratio
>> is not supported by the user.
>>
>> This patch:
>> 1. rejects the modes with aspect-ratio info, during modeset, if the
>> user does not support aspect ratio.
>> 2. does not load the aspect-ratio info in user-mode structure, if
>> aspect ratio is not supported.
>> 3. adds helper functions for determining if aspect-ratio is expected
>> in user-mode and for allowing/disallowing the aspect-ratio, if its
>> not expected.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal at intel.com>
>>
>> V3: Addressed review comments from Ville:
>> Do not corrupt the current crtc state by updating aspect-ratio on
>> the fly.
>> V4: rebase
>> V5: As suggested by Ville, rejected the modeset calls for modes with
>> aspect ratio, if the user does not set aspect-ratio cap.
>> V6: Used the helper functions for determining if aspect-ratio is
>> expected in the user-mode.
>> V7: rebase
>> V8: rebase
>> V9: rebase
>> v10: Modified the commit-message
>> v11: rebase
>> v12: Merged the patch for adding aspect-ratio helper functions
>> with this patch.
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c | 8 ++++++++
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> include/drm/drm_modes.h | 4 ++++
>> 3 files changed, 57 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c
>> index a231dd5..98323f4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c
>> @@ -449,6 +449,7 @@ int drm_mode_getcrtc(struct drm_device *dev,
>> crtc_resp->mode_valid = 0;
>> }
>> }
>> + drm_mode_filter_aspect_ratio_flags(file_priv, &crtc_resp->mode);
>> drm_modeset_unlock(&crtc->mutex);
>>
>> return 0;
>> @@ -628,6 +629,13 @@ int drm_mode_setcrtc(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
>> ret = -ENOMEM;
>> goto out;
>> }
>> + if (!drm_mode_aspect_ratio_allowed(file_priv,
>> + &crtc_req->mode)) {
>> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Unexpected aspect-ratio flag bits\n");
>> + ret = -EINVAL;
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>> +
>>
>> ret = drm_mode_convert_umode(dev, mode, &crtc_req->mode);
>> if (ret) {
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c
>> index c395a24..d6f68c8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c
>> @@ -1759,3 +1759,48 @@ bool drm_mode_is_420(const struct drm_display_info *display,
>> drm_mode_is_420_also(display, mode);
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_mode_is_420);
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * drm_mode_aspect_ratio_allowed - checks if the aspect-ratio information
>> + * is expected from the user-mode.
>> + *
>> + * If the user has set aspect-ratio cap, then the flag of the user-mode is
>> + * allowed to contain aspect-ratio value.
>> + * If the user does not set aspect-ratio cap, then the only value allowed in the
>> + * flags bits is aspect-ratio NONE.
>> + *
>> + * @file_priv: file private structure to get the user capabilities
>> + * @umode: drm_mode_modeinfo struct, whose flag carry the aspect ratio
>> + * information.
>> + *
>> + * Returns:
>> + * true if the aspect-ratio info is allowed in the user-mode flags.
>> + * false, otherwise.
>> + */
>> +bool
>> +drm_mode_aspect_ratio_allowed(const struct drm_file *file_priv,
>> + struct drm_mode_modeinfo *umode)
>> +{
>> + return file_priv->aspect_ratio_allowed || (umode->flags &
>> + DRM_MODE_FLAG_PIC_AR_MASK) == DRM_MODE_FLAG_PIC_AR_NONE;
> Still looks funny.
Alright. Let me change it to:
if (file_priv->aspect_ratio_allowed ||
(umode->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_PIC_AR_MASK) ==
DRM_MODE_FLAG_PIC_AR_NONE)
return true;
return false;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * drm_mode_filter_aspect_ratio_flags - filters the aspect-ratio bits in the
>> + * user-mode flags.
>> + *
>> + * Checks if the aspect-ratio information is allowed. Resets the aspect-ratio
>> + * bits in the user-mode flags, if aspect-ratio info is not allowed.
>> + *
>> + * @file_priv: file private structure to get the user capabilities.
>> + * @umode: drm_mode_modeinfo struct, whose flags' aspect-ratio bits needs to
>> + * be filtered.
>> + *
>> + */
>> +void
>> +drm_mode_filter_aspect_ratio_flags(const struct drm_file *file_priv,
>> + struct drm_mode_modeinfo *umode)
>> +{
>> + if (!drm_mode_aspect_ratio_allowed(file_priv, umode))
>> + umode->flags &= ~DRM_MODE_FLAG_PIC_AR_MASK;
>> +}
>> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_modes.h b/include/drm/drm_modes.h
>> index 2f78b7e..e0b060d 100644
>> --- a/include/drm/drm_modes.h
>> +++ b/include/drm/drm_modes.h
>> @@ -461,6 +461,10 @@ bool drm_mode_is_420_also(const struct drm_display_info *display,
>> const struct drm_display_mode *mode);
>> bool drm_mode_is_420(const struct drm_display_info *display,
>> const struct drm_display_mode *mode);
>> +bool drm_mode_aspect_ratio_allowed(const struct drm_file *file_priv,
>> + struct drm_mode_modeinfo *umode);
>> +void drm_mode_filter_aspect_ratio_flags(const struct drm_file *file_priv,
>> + struct drm_mode_modeinfo *umode);
> Since these are no longer exported the prototypes should go into
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc_internal.h
Got it, will move the prototypes to the correct place.
Thanks for pointing that out.
Regards,
Ankit
>
>> struct drm_display_mode *drm_cvt_mode(struct drm_device *dev,
>> int hdisplay, int vdisplay, int vrefresh,
>> --
>> 2.7.4
> --
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/attachments/20180430/d8aa57bb/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list