[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_pipe_crc_basic: expect setting bad source to fail
Maarten Lankhorst
maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com
Thu Aug 2 10:42:32 UTC 2018
Op 02-07-18 om 13:27 schreef Maarten Lankhorst:
> Op 02-07-18 om 13:16 schreef Mahesh Kumar:
>> Now crc-core framework verifies the source string passed by the user.
>> So setting bad-source will fail. Expect file write to fail in bad-source
>> subtest of kms_pipe_crc_basic.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mahesh Kumar <mahesh1.kumar at intel.com>
>> ---
>> tests/kms_pipe_crc_basic.c | 3 +--
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/kms_pipe_crc_basic.c b/tests/kms_pipe_crc_basic.c
>> index 235fdc38..2d4dfee8 100644
>> --- a/tests/kms_pipe_crc_basic.c
>> +++ b/tests/kms_pipe_crc_basic.c
>> @@ -48,8 +48,7 @@ static struct {
>>
>> static void test_bad_source(data_t *data)
>> {
>> - igt_assert(igt_sysfs_set(data->debugfs, "crtc-0/crc/control", "foo"));
>> - igt_assert(openat(data->debugfs, "crtc-0/crc/data", O_WRONLY) == -1);
>> + igt_assert(!igt_sysfs_set(data->debugfs, "crtc-0/crc/control", "foo"));
>> }
>>
>> #define N_CRCS 3
> New behavior makes more sense.
>
> Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com>
>
> Do you have igt commit rights?
>
Any objections if we change this to allow both behaviors?
diff --git a/tests/kms_pipe_crc_basic.c b/tests/kms_pipe_crc_basic.c
index 235fdc386ba2..91909fa42f2f 100644
--- a/tests/kms_pipe_crc_basic.c
+++ b/tests/kms_pipe_crc_basic.c
@@ -48,8 +48,11 @@ static struct {
static void test_bad_source(data_t *data)
{
- igt_assert(igt_sysfs_set(data->debugfs, "crtc-0/crc/control", "foo"));
- igt_assert(openat(data->debugfs, "crtc-0/crc/data", O_WRONLY) == -1);
+ errno = 0;
+ if (igt_sysfs_set(data->debugfs, "crtc-0/crc/control", "foo"))
+ igt_assert(openat(data->debugfs, "crtc-0/crc/data", O_WRONLY) == -1);
+ else
+ igt_assert_eq(errno, EINVAL);
}
#define N_CRCS 3
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list