[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4] drm/amdgpu: Transfer fences to dmabuf importer
Christian König
ckoenig.leichtzumerken at gmail.com
Tue Aug 7 18:18:55 UTC 2018
Am 07.08.2018 um 20:14 schrieb Chris Wilson:
> Quoting Christian König (2018-08-07 18:57:16)
>> Am 07.08.2018 um 18:08 schrieb Chris Wilson:
>>> amdgpu only uses shared-fences internally, but dmabuf importers rely on
>>> implicit write hazard tracking via the reservation_object.fence_excl.
>>> For example, the importer use the write hazard for timing a page flip to
>>> only occur after the exporter has finished flushing its write into the
>>> surface. As such, on exporting a dmabuf, we must either flush all
>>> outstanding fences (for we do not know which are writes and should have
>>> been exclusive) or alternatively create a new exclusive fence that is
>>> the composite of all the existing shared fences, and so will only be
>>> signaled when all earlier fences are signaled (ensuring that we can not
>>> be signaled before the completion of any earlier write).
>>>
>>> v2: reservation_object is already locked by amdgpu_bo_reserve()
>>>
>>> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107341
>>> Testcase: igt/amd_prime/amd-to-i915
>>> References: 8e94a46c1770 ("drm/amdgpu: Attach exclusive fence to prime exported bo's. (v5)")
>>> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
>>> Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher at amd.com>
>>> Cc: "Christian König" <christian.koenig at amd.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> This time, hopefully proofread and references complete.
>>> -Chris
>>>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_prime.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++---
>>> 1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_prime.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_prime.c
>>> index 1c5d97f4b4dd..dff2b01a3d89 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_prime.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_prime.c
>>> @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@
>>> #include "amdgpu_display.h"
>>> #include <drm/amdgpu_drm.h>
>>> #include <linux/dma-buf.h>
>>> +#include <linux/dma-fence-array.h>
>>>
>>> static const struct dma_buf_ops amdgpu_dmabuf_ops;
>>>
>>> @@ -188,6 +189,57 @@ amdgpu_gem_prime_import_sg_table(struct drm_device *dev,
>>> return ERR_PTR(ret);
>>> }
>>>
>>> +static int
>>> +__reservation_object_make_exclusive(struct reservation_object *obj)
>>> +{
>>> + struct reservation_object_list *fobj;
>>> + struct dma_fence_array *array;
>>> + struct dma_fence **fences;
>>> + unsigned int count, i;
>>> +
>>> + fobj = reservation_object_get_list(obj);
>>> + if (!fobj)
>>> + return 0;
>>> +
>>> + count = !!rcu_access_pointer(obj->fence_excl);
>>> + count += fobj->shared_count;
>>> +
>>> + fences = kmalloc_array(count, sizeof(*fences), GFP_KERNEL);
>>> + if (!fences)
>>> + return -ENOMEM;
>>> +
>>> + for (i = 0; i < fobj->shared_count; i++) {
>>> + struct dma_fence *f =
>>> + rcu_dereference_protected(fobj->shared[i],
>>> + reservation_object_held(obj));
>>> +
>>> + fences[i] = dma_fence_get(f);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + if (rcu_access_pointer(obj->fence_excl)) {
>>> + struct dma_fence *f =
>>> + rcu_dereference_protected(obj->fence_excl,
>>> + reservation_object_held(obj));
>>> +
>>> + fences[i] = dma_fence_get(f);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + array = dma_fence_array_create(count, fences,
>>> + dma_fence_context_alloc(1), 0,
>>> + false);
>>> + if (!array)
>>> + goto err_fences_put;
>>> +
>>> + reservation_object_add_excl_fence(obj, &array->base);
>>> + return 0;
>>> +
>>> +err_fences_put:
>>> + for (i = 0; i < count; i++)
>>> + dma_fence_put(fences[i]);
>>> + kfree(fences);
>>> + return -ENOMEM;
>>> +}
>>> +
>> This can be simplified a lot. See amdgpu_pasid_free_delayed() for an
>> example:
> {
> if (!reservation_object_get_list(obj))
> return 0;
>
> r = reservation_object_get_fences_rcu(obj, NULL, &count, &fences);
> if (r)
> return r;
>
> array = dma_fence_array_create(count, fences,
> dma_fence_context_alloc(1), 0,
> false);
> if (!array)
> goto err_fences_put;
>
> reservation_object_add_excl_fence(obj, &array->base);
> return 0;
>
> err:
> ...
> }
>
> My starting point was going to be use get_fences_rcu, but get_fences_rcu
> can hardly be called simple for where the lock is required to be held
> start to finish ;)
What are you talking about? get_fences_rcu doesn't require any locking
at all.
You only need to the locking to make sure that between creating the
fence array and calling reservation_object_add_excl_fence() no other
fence is added.
Christian.
> -Chris
> _______________________________________________
> amd-gfx mailing list
> amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list