[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] intel-ci: Skip module reloads
Chris Wilson
chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Fri Aug 10 09:21:59 UTC 2018
Quoting Petri Latvala (2018-08-10 10:11:29)
> On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 10:02:46AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > Reloading the module may impact subsequent tests by destabilising the
> > system. As we do for BAT, if we want to test reloads, it should be
> > handled explicitly at the end of the run, rather than placed at random
> > in the middle of the test list.
> >
> > References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106539
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > Cc: Tomi Sarvela <tomi.p.sarvela at intel.com>
> > ---
> > tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt b/tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt
> > index 1d1652964..066a5c014 100644
> > --- a/tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt
> > +++ b/tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt
> > @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ igt at meta_test(@.*)?
> > ###############################################
> > # GEM
> > ###############################################
> > +igt at drv_module_reload(@.*)?
>
> "GEM"?
That didn't apply to the selftests or drm_mm, so I thought it was the
usual misleading comment.
> Comment the line with the explanation from the commit message.
Where are comments allowed?
-Chris
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list