[Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 1/7] gem_wsim: Check sleep times
Tvrtko Ursulin
tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com
Tue Aug 14 15:21:08 UTC 2018
On 14/08/2018 16:09, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-08-14 16:05:13)
>> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
>>
>> Notice in more places if we are running behind.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
>> ---
>> benchmarks/gem_wsim.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>> 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/benchmarks/gem_wsim.c b/benchmarks/gem_wsim.c
>> index 80f180829241..ead91b0f009b 100644
>> --- a/benchmarks/gem_wsim.c
>> +++ b/benchmarks/gem_wsim.c
>> @@ -1718,6 +1718,21 @@ static bool sync_deps(struct workload *wrk, struct w_step *w)
>> return synced;
>> }
>>
>> +static unsigned int measured_usleep(unsigned int usec)
>> +{
>> + struct timespec ts = { };
>> + unsigned int slept;
>> +
>> + slept = igt_nsec_elapsed(&ts);
>> + igt_assert(slept == 0);
>> + do {
>> + usleep(usec - slept);
>> + slept = igt_nsec_elapsed(&ts) / 1000;
>> + } while (slept < usec);
>> +
>> + return igt_nsec_elapsed(&ts);
>> +}
>> +
>> static void *run_workload(void *data)
>> {
>> struct workload *wrk = (struct workload *)data;
>> @@ -1739,7 +1754,7 @@ static void *run_workload(void *data)
>> count++) {
>> unsigned int cur_seqno = wrk->sync_seqno;
>>
>> - clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &wrk->repeat_start);
>> + igt_gettime(&wrk->repeat_start);
>
> Were you already linking against libigt?
> This code is not set up to hit an igt_assert()...
This code meaning gem_wsim? There's a lot of asserts in it already, and
when they trigger traceback looks fine. What do you think is missing?
Regards,
Tvrtko
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list