[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] intel-ci: Exclude pm_rpm module-reload from full testing
Petri Latvala
petri.latvala at intel.com
Thu Aug 16 08:43:10 UTC 2018
On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 09:00:37AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Petri Latvala (2018-08-16 08:56:27)
> > On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 07:06:46AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > The pm_rpm module-reload exists to exercise a rpm wakeref leak, and
> > > affects the random selection of tests run after it. Similar to the
> > > normal module-reload tests, care must be taken in its execution to avoid
> > > causing spurious failures elsewhere.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > > ---
> > > tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt | 1 +
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt b/tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt
> > > index c93554a37..88b2fe313 100644
> > > --- a/tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt
> > > +++ b/tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt
> > > @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ igt at drm_mm(@.*)?
> > > # failures in tests run afterwards.
> > > ###############################################
> > > igt at drv_module_reload(@.*)?
> > > +igt at pm_rpm@module-reload
> >
> >
> > As we don't have machinery in place yet to run these reloading tests
> > in shards in a controlled manner, should this be added to
> > fast-feedback to not lose the coverage entirely?
>
> It already is in fast-feedback awaiting us landing the wakeref fix. :-p
Blindness is bad, kids.
Acked-by: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala at intel.com>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list