[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] Increase the string size for a module name
Petri Latvala
petri.latvala at intel.com
Tue Aug 21 09:13:08 UTC 2018
On Sat, Jul 07, 2018 at 08:24:39PM -0300, Rodrigo Siqueira wrote:
> Some modules name are larger than 5 characters, this can be a problem to
> add support for other modules. This patch, increase the maximum size in
> order to enable other modules to use IGT.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <rodrigosiqueiramelo at gmail.com>
> ---
> lib/drmtest.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/drmtest.c b/lib/drmtest.c
> index fae6f86f..eee733eb 100644
> --- a/lib/drmtest.c
> +++ b/lib/drmtest.c
> @@ -60,6 +60,8 @@
> #include "ioctl_wrappers.h"
> #include "igt_dummyload.h"
>
> +#define NAME_LEN 32
> +
> /**
> * SECTION:drmtest
> * @short_description: Base library for drm tests and tools
> @@ -82,7 +84,7 @@ static int __get_drm_device_name(int fd, char *name)
> drm_version_t version;
>
> memset(&version, 0, sizeof(version));
> - version.name_len = 4;
> + version.name_len = NAME_LEN;
> version.name = name;
>
> if (!drmIoctl(fd, DRM_IOCTL_VERSION, &version)){
> @@ -94,7 +96,7 @@ static int __get_drm_device_name(int fd, char *name)
>
> static bool __is_device(int fd, const char *expect)
> {
> - char name[5] = "";
> + char name[NAME_LEN] = "";
This would need to be NAME_LEN + 1 to have room for the
null-termination.
But, is this patch really necessary? Are there false matches from
using a substring of 4 to match driver names?
--
Petri Latvala
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list