[Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] [PATCH] [intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/pm_backlight.c : Brightness test with DPMS and System suspend.
Rodrigo Vivi
rodrigo.vivi at intel.com
Thu Aug 30 00:40:37 UTC 2018
On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 08:16:28AM -0400, Jyoti Yadav wrote:
> From: Jyoti <jyoti.r.yadav at intel.com>
>
> BIOS programs few of PWM related registers during initial boot.
> But during System suspend those registers are cleared.
> This test aim to check whether display programs those registers properly after
> system resume.
> Also checks brightness programming during DPMS ON/OFF cycle to check backlight
> programming is done properly from display side.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jyoti Yadav <jyoti.r.yadav at intel.com>
> ---
> tests/pm_backlight.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/pm_backlight.c b/tests/pm_backlight.c
> index a695f90..6f6d727 100644
> --- a/tests/pm_backlight.c
> +++ b/tests/pm_backlight.c
> @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ struct context {
> #define FADESPEED 100 /* milliseconds between steps */
>
> IGT_TEST_DESCRIPTION("Basic backlight sysfs test");
> +static int8_t *pm_data = NULL;
>
> static int backlight_read(int *result, const char *fname)
> {
> @@ -150,19 +151,60 @@ static void test_fade(struct context *context)
> nanosleep(&ts, NULL);
> }
> }
> +static void test_fade_with_dpms(struct context *context, igt_output_t *output)
nip: what about test_fade_after_dpms_on_off() ?
but with is not wrong or bad, just my poor brain first thought you
would try fade test between off and on, what doesn't make any sense I know...
> +{
> + int i;
> + static const struct timespec ts = { .tv_sec = 0, .tv_nsec = FADESPEED*1000000 };
> + bool has_runtime_pm;
> + has_runtime_pm = igt_setup_runtime_pm();
> + igt_info("Runtime PM support: %d\n", has_runtime_pm);
> + igt_assert(has_runtime_pm);
> + kmstest_set_connector_dpms(output->display->drm_fd, output->config.connector, DRM_MODE_DPMS_OFF);
> + igt_assert(igt_wait_for_pm_status(IGT_RUNTIME_PM_STATUS_SUSPENDED));
> + kmstest_set_connector_dpms(output->display->drm_fd, output->config.connector, DRM_MODE_DPMS_ON);
> + igt_assert(igt_wait_for_pm_status(IGT_RUNTIME_PM_STATUS_ACTIVE));
> +
> + /* Fade out, then in */
> + for (i = context->max; i > 0; i -= context->max / FADESTEPS) {
> + test_and_verify(context, i);
> + nanosleep(&ts, NULL);
> + }
> + for (i = 0; i <= context->max; i += context->max / FADESTEPS) {
> + test_and_verify(context, i);
> + nanosleep(&ts, NULL);
> + }
I think this function should only include the dpms part and then we call
test_fade(context) directly instead of duplicating the code...
> +}
> +static void test_fade_with_suspend(struct context *context, igt_output_t *output)
> +{
> + int i;
> + static const struct timespec ts = { .tv_sec = 0, .tv_nsec = FADESPEED*1000000 };
> + kmstest_set_connector_dpms(output->display->drm_fd, output->config.connector, DRM_MODE_DPMS_OFF);
> + igt_assert(igt_wait_for_pm_status(IGT_RUNTIME_PM_STATUS_SUSPENDED));
> + igt_system_suspend_autoresume(SUSPEND_STATE_MEM, SUSPEND_TEST_NONE);
> +
> + /* Fade out, then in */
> + for (i = context->max; i > 0; i -= context->max / FADESTEPS) {
> + test_and_verify(context, i);
> + nanosleep(&ts, NULL);
> + }
> + for (i = 0; i <= context->max; i += context->max / FADESTEPS) {
> + test_and_verify(context, i);
> + nanosleep(&ts, NULL);
> + }
same here...
besides the code duplication everything else lgtm
Thanks,
Rodrigo.
> +}
>
> igt_main
> {
> struct context context = {0};
> int old;
> igt_display_t display;
> + igt_output_t *output;
> struct igt_fb fb;
>
> igt_skip_on_simulation();
>
> igt_fixture {
> enum pipe pipe;
> - igt_output_t *output;
> bool found = false;
> char full_name[32] = {};
> char *name;
> @@ -187,7 +229,6 @@ igt_main
> for_each_pipe_with_valid_output(&display, pipe, output) {
> if (strcmp(name + 6, output->name))
> continue;
> -
> found = true;
> break;
> }
> @@ -205,6 +246,7 @@ igt_main
> igt_plane_set_fb(primary, &fb);
>
> igt_display_commit2(&display, display.is_atomic ? COMMIT_ATOMIC : COMMIT_LEGACY);
> + pm_data = igt_pm_enable_sata_link_power_management();
> }
>
> igt_subtest("basic-brightness")
> @@ -213,6 +255,10 @@ igt_main
> test_bad_brightness(&context);
> igt_subtest("fade")
> test_fade(&context);
> + igt_subtest("fade_with_dpms")
> + test_fade_with_dpms(&context, output);
> + igt_subtest("fade_with_suspend")
> + test_fade_with_suspend(&context, output);
>
> igt_fixture {
> /* Restore old brightness */
> @@ -220,6 +266,8 @@ igt_main
>
> igt_display_fini(&display);
> igt_remove_fb(display.drm_fd, &fb);
> + igt_pm_restore_sata_link_power_management(pm_data);
> + free(pm_data);
> close(display.drm_fd);
> }
> }
> --
> 1.9.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> igt-dev mailing list
> igt-dev at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list