[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Rename full ppgtt configuration to be more generic
Chris Wilson
chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Fri Aug 31 15:51:29 UTC 2018
Quoting Bob Paauwe (2018-08-31 16:47:04)
> For ppgtt, what we're really interested in is the number of page
> walk levels for each platform. Rename the device info fields to
> reflect this:
>
> .has_full_48b_ppgtt -> .has_full_4lvl_ppgtt
> .has_full_ppgtt -> .has_full_3lvl_ppgtt
>
> Also add a new field, full_ppgtt_bits, that defines the actual
> address range. This gives us more flexibility and will work for
> cases where we have platforms with different address ranges but
> share the same page walk levels.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bob Paauwe <bob.j.paauwe at intel.com>
> CC: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
> CC: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 4 +--
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c | 34 +++++++++++++-----------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c | 3 ++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c | 17 +++++++-----
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h | 7 +++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/huge_pages.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_evict.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_gtt.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_gem_device.c | 2 ++
> 11 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index e5b9d3c77139..b9f7903e60d1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -2569,8 +2569,8 @@ intel_info(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> #define HAS_EXECLISTS(dev_priv) HAS_LOGICAL_RING_CONTEXTS(dev_priv)
>
> #define USES_PPGTT(dev_priv) (i915_modparams.enable_ppgtt)
> -#define USES_FULL_PPGTT(dev_priv) (i915_modparams.enable_ppgtt >= 2)
> -#define USES_FULL_48BIT_PPGTT(dev_priv) (i915_modparams.enable_ppgtt == 3)
> +#define USES_FULL_3LVL_PPGTT(dev_priv) (i915_modparams.enable_ppgtt >= 2)
> +#define USES_FULL_4LVL_PPGTT(dev_priv) (i915_modparams.enable_ppgtt == 3)
> #define HAS_PAGE_SIZES(dev_priv, sizes) ({ \
> GEM_BUG_ON((sizes) == 0); \
> ((sizes) & ~(dev_priv)->info.page_sizes) == 0; \
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c
> index f15a039772db..a0dc3170b358 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c
> @@ -361,7 +361,7 @@ i915_gem_create_context(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> if (IS_ERR(ctx))
> return ctx;
>
> - if (USES_FULL_PPGTT(dev_priv)) {
> + if (USES_FULL_3LVL_PPGTT(dev_priv)) {
That is not an improvement. It really is a question of whether or not
full-ppgtt is enabled.
> struct i915_hw_ppgtt *ppgtt;
>
> ppgtt = i915_ppgtt_create(dev_priv, file_priv);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> index a926d7d47183..166f1ea1786f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> @@ -2201,7 +2201,7 @@ i915_gem_do_execbuffer(struct drm_device *dev,
> eb.flags = (unsigned int *)(eb.vma + args->buffer_count + 1);
>
> eb.invalid_flags = __EXEC_OBJECT_UNKNOWN_FLAGS;
> - if (USES_FULL_PPGTT(eb.i915))
> + if (USES_FULL_3LVL_PPGTT(eb.i915))
Again the same complaint.
I think you need to rethink the semantics carefully.
-Chris
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list