[Intel-gfx] [v2 02/14] drm: Add CEA extended tag blocks and HDR bitfield macros

[Sharma, Shashank]

Regards

Shashank


On 12/12/2018 2:08 AM, Uma Shankar wrote:
> Add bit field and macro for extended tag in CEA block. Also,
> declare macros for HDR metadata block.
This should have been a part of patch, where these macros are being 
used, so that we can see it being used properly. While re-basing can you 
please merge ?
> v2: Rebase
>
> Signed-off-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar at intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> index b506e36..106fd38 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> @@ -2843,6 +2843,22 @@ static int drm_cvt_modes(struct drm_connector *connector,
>   #define EDID_CEA_YCRCB422	(1 << 4)
>   #define EDID_CEA_VCDB_QS	(1 << 6)
>   
> +#define DATA_BLOCK_EXTENDED_TAG		0x07
Alignment should be one tab back, also I think we already have added 
extended tag macro (for parsing YCBCR420 blocks)
> +#define VIDEO_CAPABILITY_DATA_BLOCK	0x0
> +#define VSVD_DATA_BLOCK			0x1
Alignment one tab back
> +#define COLORIMETRY_DATA_BLOCK		0x5
> +#define HDR_STATIC_METADATA_BLOCK	0x6
> +
> +/* HDR Metadata Block: Bit fields */
> +#define SUPPORTED_EOTF_MASK            0x3f
> +#define TRADITIONAL_GAMMA_SDR          (0x1 << 0)
> +#define TRADITIONAL_GAMMA_HDR          (0x1 << 1)
> +#define SMPTE_ST2084                   (0x1 << 2)
> +#define FUTURE_EOTF                    (0x1 << 3)
why not properly call it HLG if we are adding a bit for it already ?
> +#define RESERVED_EOTF                  (0x3 << 4)
> +
> +#define STATIC_METADATA_TYPE1          (0x1 << 0)
> +
>   /*
>    * Search EDID for CEA extension block.
>    */
- Shashank