[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/19] drm/i915/execlists: Reduce list_for_each_safe+list_safe_reset_next

[Chris Wilson]

After staring at the list_for_each_safe macros for a bit, our current
invocation of list_safe_reset_next in execlists_schedule() simply
reduces to list_for_each.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
index 8c9d6cef2482..ffc20d7b754e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
@@ -1024,7 +1024,7 @@ static void execlists_schedule(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request, int prio)
 	 * end result is a topological list of requests in reverse order, the
 	 * last element in the list is the request we must execute first.
 	 */
-	list_for_each_entry_safe(dep, p, &dfs, dfs_link) {
+	list_for_each_entry(dep, &dfs, dfs_link) {
 		struct i915_priotree *pt = dep->signaler;
 
 		/*
@@ -1043,8 +1043,6 @@ static void execlists_schedule(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request, int prio)
 			if (prio > READ_ONCE(p->signaler->priority))
 				list_move_tail(&p->dfs_link, &dfs);
 		}
-
-		list_safe_reset_next(dep, p, dfs_link);
 	}
 
 	/*
-- 
2.15.1