[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 03/12] drm/i915/guc: Pass intel_guc struct parameter to GuC interrupts functions

Sagar Arun Kamble sagar.a.kamble at intel.com
Fri Jan 5 04:30:18 UTC 2018



On 1/4/2018 10:01 PM, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Jan 2018 17:23:05 +0100, Chris Wilson 
> <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> Quoting Sagar Arun Kamble (2018-01-04 16:21:45)
>>> GuC interrupts handling functions are GuC specific functions hence 
>>> update
>>> the parameter from dev_priv to intel_guc struct.
>>>
>>> v2-v3: Rebase.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble at intel.com>
>>> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko at intel.com>
>>> Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio at intel.com>
>>> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
>>> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
>>> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen at linux.intel.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c      |  2 +-
>>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c     | 22 +++++++++++++++-------
>>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h     |  8 ++++----
>>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_log.c |  8 +++-----
>>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c      |  8 ++++----
>>>  5 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c 
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
>>> index 3f4eff9..a1ae057 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
>>> @@ -1447,7 +1447,7 @@ static void gen8_gt_irq_handler(struct 
>>> drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>>>                 gen6_rps_irq_handler(dev_priv, gt_iir[2]);
>>>
>>>         if (gt_iir[2] & dev_priv->pm_guc_events)
>>> -               intel_guc_irq_handler(dev_priv, gt_iir[2]);
>>> +               intel_guc_irq_handler(&dev_priv->guc, gt_iir[2]);
>>>  }
>>>
>>>  static bool bxt_port_hotplug_long_detect(enum port port, u32 val)
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c 
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c
>>> index e95ff2d..14bf508d 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c
>>> @@ -400,7 +400,7 @@ int intel_guc_suspend(struct drm_i915_private 
>>> *dev_priv)
>>>         if (guc->fw.load_status != INTEL_UC_FIRMWARE_SUCCESS)
>>>                 return 0;
>>>
>>> -       intel_disable_guc_interrupts(dev_priv);
>>> +       intel_disable_guc_interrupts(guc);
>>>
>>>         data[0] = INTEL_GUC_ACTION_ENTER_S_STATE;
>>>         /* any value greater than GUC_POWER_D0 */
>>> @@ -446,7 +446,7 @@ int intel_guc_resume(struct drm_i915_private 
>>> *dev_priv)
>>>                 return 0;
>>>
>>>         if (i915_modparams.guc_log_level >= 0)
>>> -               intel_enable_guc_interrupts(dev_priv);
>>> +               intel_enable_guc_interrupts(guc);
>>>
>>>         data[0] = INTEL_GUC_ACTION_EXIT_S_STATE;
>>>         data[1] = GUC_POWER_D0;
>>> @@ -508,15 +508,19 @@ u32 intel_guc_wopcm_size(struct 
>>> drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>>>         return wopcm_size;
>>>  }
>>>
>>> -void intel_reset_guc_interrupts(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>>> +void intel_reset_guc_interrupts(struct intel_guc *guc)
>>>  {
>>> +       struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = guc_to_i915(guc);
>>> +
>>>         spin_lock_irq(&dev_priv->irq_lock);
>>>         gen6_reset_pm_iir(dev_priv, dev_priv->pm_guc_events);
>>>         spin_unlock_irq(&dev_priv->irq_lock);
>>>  }
>>>
>>> -void intel_enable_guc_interrupts(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>>> +void intel_enable_guc_interrupts(struct intel_guc *guc)
>>>  {
>>> +       struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = guc_to_i915(guc);
>>> +
>>>         spin_lock_irq(&dev_priv->irq_lock);
>>>         if (!dev_priv->guc.interrupts_enabled) {
>>>                 WARN_ON_ONCE(I915_READ(gen6_pm_iir(dev_priv)) &
>>> @@ -527,8 +531,10 @@ void intel_enable_guc_interrupts(struct 
>>> drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>>>         spin_unlock_irq(&dev_priv->irq_lock);
>>>  }
>>>
>>> -void intel_disable_guc_interrupts(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>>> +void intel_disable_guc_interrupts(struct intel_guc *guc)
>>>  {
>>> +       struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = guc_to_i915(guc);
>>> +
>>>         spin_lock_irq(&dev_priv->irq_lock);
>>>         dev_priv->guc.interrupts_enabled = false;
>>>
>>> @@ -537,11 +543,13 @@ void intel_disable_guc_interrupts(struct 
>>> drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>>>         spin_unlock_irq(&dev_priv->irq_lock);
>>>         synchronize_irq(dev_priv->drm.irq);
>>>
>>> -       intel_reset_guc_interrupts(dev_priv);
>>> +       intel_reset_guc_interrupts(guc);
>>>  }
>>>
>>> -void intel_guc_irq_handler(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 
>>> gt_iir)
>>> +void intel_guc_irq_handler(struct intel_guc *guc, u32 gt_iir)
>>>  {
>>> +       struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = guc_to_i915(guc);
>>> +
>>>         if (gt_iir & GEN9_GUC_TO_HOST_INT_EVENT) {
>>>                 /* Sample the log buffer flush related bits & clear 
>>> them out now
>>>                  * itself from the message identity register to 
>>> minimize the
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h 
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h
>>> index c37d34d..49f33b9 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h
>>> @@ -131,9 +131,9 @@ static inline u32 guc_ggtt_offset(struct 
>>> i915_vma *vma)
>>>  int intel_guc_resume(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>>>  struct i915_vma *intel_guc_allocate_vma(struct intel_guc *guc, u32 
>>> size);
>>>  u32 intel_guc_wopcm_size(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>>> -void intel_reset_guc_interrupts(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>>> -void intel_enable_guc_interrupts(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>>> -void intel_disable_guc_interrupts(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>>> -void intel_guc_irq_handler(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 
>>> pm_iir);
>>> +void intel_reset_guc_interrupts(struct intel_guc *guc);
>>> +void intel_enable_guc_interrupts(struct intel_guc *guc);
>>> +void intel_disable_guc_interrupts(struct intel_guc *guc);
>>> +void intel_guc_irq_handler(struct intel_guc *guc, u32 pm_iir);
>>
>> You should also consider s/intel_verb_guc/intel_guc_verb/ since we are
>> now passing intel_guc as the object.
>
> And additionally also consider squashing this patch with 02/12 (and maybe
> 01/12 as well) to avoid changing the same lines twice
Sure. Will do these changes. Thanks Michal, Chris.
>
> Michal
>



More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list