[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/2] kms_content_protection: Add Content Protection test

Sean Paul seanpaul at chromium.org
Sat Jan 6 13:00:53 UTC 2018


On Sat, Jan 6, 2018 at 5:44 AM, Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c at intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Saturday 06 January 2018 12:59 AM, Sean Paul wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 9:28 AM, Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c at intel.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Adding few more findings from the IGT usage with kernel solutions.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wednesday 13 December 2017 04:07 PM, Ramalingam C wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Sean,
>>>>
>>>> Adding few more observations.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thursday 07 December 2017 05:47 AM, Sean Paul wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Pretty simple test:
>>>>> - initializes the output
>>>>> - clears the content protection property
>>>>> - verifies that it clears
>>>>> - sets the content protection property to desired
>>>>> - verifies that it transitions to enabled
>>>>>
>>>>> Does this for both legacy and atomic.
>>>>>
>>>>> Changes in v2:
>>>>> - Don't check for i915 gen
>>>>> - Skip test if Content Protection property is absent
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul at chromium.org>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>    lib/igt_kms.c                  |   3 +-
>>>>>    lib/igt_kms.h                  |   1 +
>>>>>    tests/Makefile.sources         |   1 +
>>>>>    tests/kms_content_protection.c | 129
>>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>    tests/meson.build              |   1 +
>>>>>    5 files changed, 134 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>    create mode 100644 tests/kms_content_protection.c
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/lib/igt_kms.c b/lib/igt_kms.c
>>>>> index 125ecb19..907db694 100644
>>>>> --- a/lib/igt_kms.c
>>>>> +++ b/lib/igt_kms.c
>>>>> @@ -190,7 +190,8 @@ const char
>>>>> *igt_connector_prop_names[IGT_NUM_CONNECTOR_PROPS] = {
>>>>>        "scaling mode",
>>>>>        "CRTC_ID",
>>>>>        "DPMS",
>>>>> -    "Broadcast RGB"
>>>>> +    "Broadcast RGB",
>>>>> +    "Content Protection"
>>>>>    };
>>>>>      /*
>>>>> diff --git a/lib/igt_kms.h b/lib/igt_kms.h
>>>>> index 2a480bf3..93e59dc7 100644
>>>>> --- a/lib/igt_kms.h
>>>>> +++ b/lib/igt_kms.h
>>>>> @@ -118,6 +118,7 @@ enum igt_atomic_connector_properties {
>>>>>           IGT_CONNECTOR_CRTC_ID,
>>>>>           IGT_CONNECTOR_DPMS,
>>>>>           IGT_CONNECTOR_BROADCAST_RGB,
>>>>> +       IGT_CONNECTOR_CONTENT_PROTECTION,
>>>>>           IGT_NUM_CONNECTOR_PROPS
>>>>>    };
>>>>>    diff --git a/tests/Makefile.sources b/tests/Makefile.sources
>>>>> index 34ca71a0..e0466411 100644
>>>>> --- a/tests/Makefile.sources
>>>>> +++ b/tests/Makefile.sources
>>>>> @@ -179,6 +179,7 @@ TESTS_progs = \
>>>>>        kms_chv_cursor_fail \
>>>>>        kms_color \
>>>>>        kms_concurrent \
>>>>> +    kms_content_protection\
>>>>>        kms_crtc_background_color \
>>>>>        kms_cursor_crc \
>>>>>        kms_cursor_legacy \
>>>>> diff --git a/tests/kms_content_protection.c
>>>>> b/tests/kms_content_protection.c
>>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>>> index 00000000..5d61b257
>>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>>> +++ b/tests/kms_content_protection.c
>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,129 @@
>>>>> +/*
>>>>> + * Copyright © 2017 Google, Inc.
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person
>>>>> obtaining
>>>>> a
>>>>> + * copy of this software and associated documentation files (the
>>>>> "Software"),
>>>>> + * to deal in the Software without restriction, including without
>>>>> limitation
>>>>> + * the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute,
>>>>> sublicense,
>>>>> + * and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom
>>>>> the
>>>>> + * Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following
>>>>> conditions:
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * The above copyright notice and this permission notice (including
>>>>> the
>>>>> next
>>>>> + * paragraph) shall be included in all copies or substantial portions
>>>>> of
>>>>> the
>>>>> + * Software.
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND,
>>>>> EXPRESS OR
>>>>> + * IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF
>>>>> MERCHANTABILITY,
>>>>> + * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT.  IN NO EVENT
>>>>> SHALL
>>>>> + * THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES
>>>>> OR
>>>>> OTHER
>>>>> + * LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE,
>>>>> ARISING
>>>>> + * FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER
>>>>> DEALINGS
>>>>> + * IN THE SOFTWARE.
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + */
>>>>> +
>>>>> +#include "igt.h"
>>>>> +
>>>>> +IGT_TEST_DESCRIPTION("Test content protection (HDCP)");
>>>>> +
>>>>> +typedef struct {
>>>>> +    int drm_fd;
>>>>> +    igt_display_t display;
>>>>> +} data_t;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +static bool
>>>>> +wait_for_prop_value(igt_output_t *output, uint64_t expected)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> +    uint64_t val;
>>>>> +    int i;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +    for (i = 0; i < 2000; i++) {
>>>>
>>>> we need 5+Sec to complete the Second part of authentication, in case of
>>>> repeater with max downstream topology.
>>>> So we might need to wait for 6000(6Sec) loops!?
>>>>>
>>>>> +        val = igt_output_get_prop(output,
>>>>> +                      IGT_CONNECTOR_CONTENT_PROTECTION);
>>>>> +        if (val == expected)
>>>>> +            return true;
>>>>> +        usleep(1000);
>>>>> +    }
>>>>> +    igt_info("prop_value mismatch %ld != %ld\n", val, expected);
>>>>> +    return false;
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>> +static void
>>>>> +test_pipe_output(igt_display_t *display, const enum pipe pipe,
>>>>> +         igt_output_t *output, enum igt_commit_style s)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> +    drmModeModeInfo mode;
>>>>> +    igt_plane_t *primary;
>>>>> +    struct igt_fb red;
>>>>> +    bool ret;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +    igt_assert(kmstest_get_connector_default_mode(
>>>>> +            display->drm_fd, output->config.connector, &mode));
>>>>> +
>>>>> +    igt_output_override_mode(output, &mode);
>>>>> +    igt_output_set_pipe(output, pipe);
>>>>> +
>>>>> +    igt_create_color_fb(display->drm_fd, mode.hdisplay, mode.vdisplay,
>>>>> +                DRM_FORMAT_XRGB8888, LOCAL_DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NONE,
>>>>> +                1.f, 0.f, 0.f, &red);
>>>>> +    primary = igt_output_get_plane_type(output,
>>>>> DRM_PLANE_TYPE_PRIMARY);
>>>>> +    igt_plane_set_fb(primary, &red);
>>>>> +    igt_display_commit2(display, s);
>>>>> +
>>>>> +    igt_output_set_prop_value(output,
>>>>> IGT_CONNECTOR_CONTENT_PROTECTION,
>>>>> 0);
>>>>> +    igt_display_commit2(display, s);
>>>>> +
>>>>> +    ret = wait_for_prop_value(output, 0);
>>>>> +    igt_require_f(ret, "Content Protection not cleared\n");
>>>>
>>>> When expected property state is not met, you might want to use
>>>> igt_assert_f to fail the subtest. Here you are just skipping the
>>>> subtest.
>>>>>
>>>>> +
>>>>> +    igt_output_set_prop_value(output,
>>>>> IGT_CONNECTOR_CONTENT_PROTECTION,
>>>>> 1);
>>>>> +    igt_display_commit2(display, s);
>>>>> +
>>>>> +    ret = wait_for_prop_value(output, 2);
>>>
>>>
>>> As there are range of HDCP sinks which might fail to provide the R0 in
>>> 100mSec in the first attempt. But passes the condition in next attempt.
>>> In the testing it is observed that many panel's widely used showcase
>>> above
>>> mentioned behavior.
>>>
>>> So we need to retry on HDCP enable before declaring the HDCP failure.
>>>
>> Instead of retrying the whole thing, why not just make the 100ms
>> timeout bigger? What values >100ms have you observed?
>
> I dont think we can increase the timeout beyond mentioned 100mSec. If we do
> so it will be non compliance with HDCP spec hence CTS will fail.

What's the difference to userspace? Isn't stringing together multiple
100ms timeouts equivalent as one longer timeout?


> IMO Retrying will be the best option left.
>
>>
>>>>> +    igt_require_f(ret, "Content Protection not enabled\n");
>>>>
>>>> same as above. igt_assert_f needed?
>>>>
>>>> And when you are done with a connector(output), we cant leave the
>>>> content
>>>> protection in desired state.
>>>> Else when we enable the connector for some other IGT, content protection
>>>> authentication will be attempted by kernel.
>>>> So when we are done with a connector, we need to clear the content
>>>> protection state(set to OFF) of the connector.
>>>>
>>>>> +
>>>>> +    igt_plane_set_fb(primary, NULL);
>>>>> +    igt_output_set_pipe(output, PIPE_NONE);
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>> +static void
>>>>> +test_content_protection(igt_display_t *display, enum igt_commit_style
>>>>> s)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> +    igt_output_t *output;
>>>>> +    enum pipe pipe;
>>>>> +    int valid_tests = 0;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +    for_each_pipe_with_valid_output(display, pipe, output) {
>>>
>>>  From the testing of this IGT with kernel changes, observed a need of
>>> relooking at HDCP subtests definition. Reasoning is as follows.
>>>
>>> And here we are taking each pipe and their compatible outputs(connectors)
>>> for hdcp test. Like PIPEA + HDMI-A-1, PIPEB+HDMI-A-1 etc.
>>> But as HDCP is associated to connectors, we need to iterate on hdcp
>>> capable
>>> connector and choose the compatible pipe.
>>> In that way, we will be able test the HDCP on all hdcp capable
>>> connectors.
>>>
>> I'm confused. The documentation for this loop says it tries every
>> combination of connector+pipe for every connected connector. Can you
>> explain what I'm missing?
>>
>> Sean
>
> Yes. Macro takes each pipe and tests against all interface able outputs. I
> missed that point.
> Still it will be efficient to test hdcp on each output with only one
> compatible pipe.
> testing with other compatible pipes of the connector has no ROI w.r.t hdcp
> testing.
>
> Considering that macro provides super set of req pipe+output combination, no
> urgency to modify immediately.
>

Ok, great! I'm relieved I was not going crazy :)

Sean


>>> And since irrespective of the hdcp status (pass/fail) on a connector, we
>>> need to test hdcp on other connectors one after another.
>>> So this can be achieved if the test of HDCP on each connector is
>>> implemented
>>> as different IGT subtests.
>>>
>>>>> +        if (!output->props[IGT_CONNECTOR_CONTENT_PROTECTION])
>>>>> +            continue;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +        test_pipe_output(display, pipe, output, s);
>>>>> +        valid_tests++;
>>>>> +    }
>>>>> +    igt_require_f(valid_tests, "no support for content proteciton
>>>>> found\n");
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>> +igt_main
>>>>> +{
>>>>> +    data_t data = {};
>>>>> +
>>>>> +    igt_fixture {
>>>>> +        igt_skip_on_simulation();
>>>>> +
>>>>> +        data.drm_fd = drm_open_driver(DRIVER_ANY);
>>>>
>>>> You need Master privilege here. Hence might want to use
>>>> drm_open_driver_master() instead.
>>>>
>>>> -Ram
>>>>>
>>>>> +
>>>>> +        igt_display_init(&data.display, data.drm_fd);
>>>>> +    }
>>>>> +
>>>>> +
>>>>> +    igt_subtest("legacy")
>>>>> +        test_content_protection(&data.display, COMMIT_LEGACY);
>>>
>>> As discussed above, we need to consider connector-x-legacy as a subtest.
>>>>>
>>>>> +
>>>>> +    igt_subtest("atomic") {
>>>>> +        igt_require(data.display.is_atomic);
>>>>> +        test_content_protection(&data.display, COMMIT_ATOMIC);
>>>
>>> As discussed above, we need to consider connector-x-atomic as a subtest.
>
> For internal testing I have sub tests defined as below. Please see if it
> helps.
> Might need some tuning though.
>
>  igt_main
>  {
>         data_t data = {};
> +       igt_output_t *output;
> +       enum pipe pipe;
> +       char test_name[50];
> +       int i;
>
>         igt_fixture {
>                 igt_skip_on_simulation();
> @@ -122,13 +109,44 @@ igt_main
>                 igt_display_init(&data.display, data.drm_fd);
>         }
>
> +       /*
> +        * Not using the for_each_connected_output as that mandates
> +        * igt_can_fail().
> +        */
> +       for (i = 0; i < data.display.n_outputs; i++)
> +       for_each_if((output = &(data.display.outputs[i]),
> + igt_output_is_connected(output))) {
> +               if (!output->props[IGT_CONNECTOR_CONTENT_PROTECTION])
> +                       continue;
>
> -       igt_subtest("legacy")
> -               test_content_protection(&data.display, COMMIT_LEGACY);
> -
> -       igt_subtest("atomic") {
> -               igt_require(data.display.is_atomic);
> -               test_content_protection(&data.display, COMMIT_ATOMIC);
> +               for_each_pipe_static(pipe) {
> +                       if (!igt_pipe_connector_valid(pipe, output))
> +                               continue;
> +
> +                       sprintf(test_name, "HDCP_%s_PIPE-%s_legacy",
> + output->name,
> + kmstest_pipe_name(pipe));
> +                       igt_subtest(test_name)
> + test_content_protection(&data.display, pipe,
> + output, COMMIT_LEGACY);
> +
> +                       if (!data.display.is_atomic)
> +                               break;
> +
> +                       sprintf(test_name, "HDCP_%s_PIPE-%s_atomic",
> + output->name,
> + kmstest_pipe_name(pipe));
> +                       igt_subtest(test_name)
> + test_content_protection(&data.display, pipe,
> + output, COMMIT_ATOMIC);
> +
> +                       /*
> +                        * Testing a output with a pipe is enough for HDCP
> +                        * testing. No ROI in testing the connector with
> other
> +                        * pipes. So Break the loop on pipe.
> +                        */
> +                       break;
> +               }
>         }
>
>         igt_fixture
>
>
>
>>>
>>> -Ram
>>>
>>>>> +    }
>>>>> +
>>>>> +    igt_fixture
>>>>> +        igt_display_fini(&data.display);
>>>>> +}
>>>>> diff --git a/tests/meson.build b/tests/meson.build
>>>>> index 59ccd9a6..b12c35c0 100644
>>>>> --- a/tests/meson.build
>>>>> +++ b/tests/meson.build
>>>>> @@ -157,6 +157,7 @@ test_progs = [
>>>>>        'kms_chv_cursor_fail',
>>>>>        'kms_color',
>>>>>        'kms_concurrent',
>>>>> +    'kms_content_protection',
>>>>>        'kms_crtc_background_color',
>>>>>        'kms_cursor_crc',
>>>>>        'kms_cursor_legacy',
>>>>
>>>>
>


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list