[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 2/9] drm/i915: Add more control to wait_for routines
Sean Paul
seanpaul at chromium.org
Mon Jan 8 19:55:36 UTC 2018
This patch adds a little more control to a couple wait_for routines such
that we can avoid open-coding read/wait/timeout patterns which:
- need the value of the register after the wait_for
- run arbitrary operation for the read portion
This patch also chooses the correct sleep function (based on
timers-howto.txt) for the polling interval the caller specifies.
Changes in v2:
- Added to the series
Changes in v3:
- Rebased on drm-intel-next-queued and the new Wmin/max _wait_for
- Removed msleep option
Changes in v4:
- Removed ; for OP in _wait_for (Chris)
- Moved reg_value definition above ret (Chris)
Changes in v4:
- checkpatch whitespace fix
Changes in v5:
- None
Changes in v6:
- None
Suggested-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul at chromium.org>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 17 ++++++++++-------
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++-------
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h | 14 +++++++++++++-
3 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
index 30f791f89d64..9848e8eb0074 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
@@ -41,20 +41,21 @@
#include <drm/drm_atomic.h>
/**
- * _wait_for - magic (register) wait macro
+ * __wait_for - magic wait macro
*
- * Does the right thing for modeset paths when run under kdgb or similar atomic
- * contexts. Note that it's important that we check the condition again after
- * having timed out, since the timeout could be due to preemption or similar and
- * we've never had a chance to check the condition before the timeout.
+ * Macro to help avoid open coding check/wait/timeout patterns. Note that it's
+ * important that we check the condition again after having timed out, since the
+ * timeout could be due to preemption or similar and we've never had a chance to
+ * check the condition before the timeout.
*/
-#define _wait_for(COND, US, Wmin, Wmax) ({ \
+#define __wait_for(OP, COND, US, Wmin, Wmax) ({ \
unsigned long timeout__ = jiffies + usecs_to_jiffies(US) + 1; \
long wait__ = (Wmin); /* recommended min for usleep is 10 us */ \
int ret__; \
might_sleep(); \
for (;;) { \
bool expired__ = time_after(jiffies, timeout__); \
+ OP; \
if (COND) { \
ret__ = 0; \
break; \
@@ -70,7 +71,9 @@
ret__; \
})
-#define wait_for(COND, MS) _wait_for((COND), (MS) * 1000, 10, 1000)
+#define _wait_for(COND, US, Wmin, Wmax) __wait_for(, (COND), (US), (Wmin), \
+ (Wmax))
+#define wait_for(COND, MS) _wait_for((COND), (MS) * 1000, 10, 1000)
/* If CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT is disabled, in_atomic() always reports false. */
#if defined(CONFIG_DRM_I915_DEBUG) && defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
index 94e1fb3a2936..1c524ed1e1da 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
@@ -1767,12 +1767,14 @@ int __intel_wait_for_register_fw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
}
/**
- * intel_wait_for_register - wait until register matches expected state
+ * __intel_wait_for_register - wait until register matches expected state
* @dev_priv: the i915 device
* @reg: the register to read
* @mask: mask to apply to register value
* @value: expected value
- * @timeout_ms: timeout in millisecond
+ * @fast_timeout_us: fast timeout in microsecond for atomic/tight wait
+ * @slow_timeout_ms: slow timeout in millisecond
+ * @out_value: optional placeholder to hold registry value
*
* This routine waits until the target register @reg contains the expected
* @value after applying the @mask, i.e. it waits until ::
@@ -1783,14 +1785,17 @@ int __intel_wait_for_register_fw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
*
* Returns 0 if the register matches the desired condition, or -ETIMEOUT.
*/
-int intel_wait_for_register(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
+int __intel_wait_for_register(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
i915_reg_t reg,
u32 mask,
u32 value,
- unsigned int timeout_ms)
+ unsigned int fast_timeout_us,
+ unsigned int slow_timeout_ms,
+ u32 *out_value)
{
unsigned fw =
intel_uncore_forcewake_for_reg(dev_priv, reg, FW_REG_READ);
+ u32 reg_value;
int ret;
might_sleep();
@@ -1800,14 +1805,18 @@ int intel_wait_for_register(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
ret = __intel_wait_for_register_fw(dev_priv,
reg, mask, value,
- 2, 0, NULL);
+ fast_timeout_us, 0, ®_value);
intel_uncore_forcewake_put__locked(dev_priv, fw);
spin_unlock_irq(&dev_priv->uncore.lock);
if (ret)
- ret = wait_for((I915_READ_NOTRACE(reg) & mask) == value,
- timeout_ms);
+ ret = __wait_for(reg_value = I915_READ_NOTRACE(reg),
+ (reg_value & mask) == value,
+ slow_timeout_ms * 1000, 10, 1000);
+
+ if (out_value)
+ *out_value = reg_value;
return ret;
}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h
index 9ce079b5dd0d..bed019ef000f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h
@@ -163,11 +163,23 @@ void intel_uncore_forcewake_put__locked(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
void intel_uncore_forcewake_user_get(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
void intel_uncore_forcewake_user_put(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
+int __intel_wait_for_register(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
+ i915_reg_t reg,
+ u32 mask,
+ u32 value,
+ unsigned int fast_timeout_us,
+ unsigned int slow_timeout_ms,
+ u32 *out_value);
+static inline
int intel_wait_for_register(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
i915_reg_t reg,
u32 mask,
u32 value,
- unsigned int timeout_ms);
+ unsigned int timeout_ms)
+{
+ return __intel_wait_for_register(dev_priv, reg, mask, value, 2,
+ timeout_ms, NULL);
+}
int __intel_wait_for_register_fw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
i915_reg_t reg,
u32 mask,
--
2.16.0.rc0.223.g4a4ac83678-goog
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list