[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915: Introduce a non-blocking power domain for vblank interrupts

Pandiyan, Dhinakaran dhinakaran.pandiyan at intel.com
Mon Jan 8 19:59:57 UTC 2018


On Thu, 2018-01-04 at 18:08 -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 08:40:00PM +0000, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote:
> > When DC states are enabled and PSR is active, the hardware enters DC5/DC6
> > states resulting in the frame counter resetting. The frame counter reset
> > mess up the vblank counting logic as the diff between the new frame
> > counter value and the previous is negative, and this negative diff gets
> > applied as an unsigned value to the vblank count. We cannot reject negative
> > diffs altogether because they can arise from legitimate frame counter
> > overflows when there is a long period with vblank disabled. So, this
> > approach allows for the driver to notice a DC state toggle between a vblank
> > disable and enable and fill in the missed vblanks.
> > 
> > But, in order to disable DC states when vblank interrupts are required,
> > the DC_OFF power well has to be disabled in an atomic context. So,
> > introduce a new VBLANK power domain that can be acquired and released in
> > atomic contexts with these changes -
> > 1)  _vblank_get() and _vblank_put() methods skip the power_domain mutex
> > and use a spin lock for the DC power well.
> > 2) power_domains->domain_use_count is converted to an atomic_t array so
> > that it can be updated outside of the power domain mutex.
> > 
> > v3: Squash domain_use_count atomic_t conversion (Maarten)
> > v2: Fix deadlock by switching irqsave spinlock.
> >     Implement atomic version of get_if_enabled.
> >     Modify power_domain_verify_state to check power well use count and
> > enabled status atomically.
> >     Rewrite of intel_power_well_{get,put}
> > 
> > Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
> > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan at intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c     |   2 +-
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h         |  19 +++-
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.h    |   1 +
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h        |   3 +
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c | 195 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> >  5 files changed, 199 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> > index d81cb2513069..5a7ce734de02 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> > @@ -2746,7 +2746,7 @@ static int i915_power_domain_info(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
> >  		for_each_power_domain(power_domain, power_well->domains)
> >  			seq_printf(m, "  %-23s %d\n",
> >  				 intel_display_power_domain_str(power_domain),
> > -				 power_domains->domain_use_count[power_domain]);
> > +				 atomic_read(&power_domains->domain_use_count[power_domain]));
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	mutex_unlock(&power_domains->lock);
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > index caebd5825279..61a635f03af7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > @@ -1032,6 +1032,23 @@ struct i915_power_well {
> >  			bool has_fuses:1;
> >  		} hsw;
> >  	};
> > +
> > +	/* Lock to serialize access to count, hw_enabled and ops, used for
> > +	 * power wells that have supports_atomix_ctx set to True.
> > +	 */
> > +	spinlock_t lock;
> > +
> > +	/* Indicates that the get/put methods for this power well can be called
> > +	 * in atomic contexts, requires .ops to not sleep. This is valid
> > +	 * only for the DC_OFF power well currently.
> > +	 */
> > +	bool supports_atomic_ctx;
> > +
> > +	/* DC_OFF power well was disabled since the last time vblanks were
> > +	 * disabled.
> > +	 */
> > +	bool dc_off_disabled;
> > +
> >  	const struct i915_power_well_ops *ops;
> >  };
> >  
> > @@ -1045,7 +1062,7 @@ struct i915_power_domains {
> >  	int power_well_count;
> >  
> >  	struct mutex lock;
> > -	int domain_use_count[POWER_DOMAIN_NUM];
> > +	atomic_t domain_use_count[POWER_DOMAIN_NUM];
> >  	struct i915_power_well *power_wells;
> >  };
> >  
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.h
> > index a0d2b6169361..3e9671ff6f79 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.h
> > @@ -172,6 +172,7 @@ enum intel_display_power_domain {
> >  	POWER_DOMAIN_AUX_C,
> >  	POWER_DOMAIN_AUX_D,
> >  	POWER_DOMAIN_GMBUS,
> > +	POWER_DOMAIN_VBLANK,
> 
> Maybe we could start a new category of atomic domains and on interations that makes sense go over both
> or making the domains in an array with is_atomic bool in case we can transform the atomic get,put to
> be really generic or into .enable .disable function pointers.


The generic interfaces we've discussed until now to get/put vblank power
domain atomically are still not generic enough. We might as well accept
DC_OFF to be a special case and deal with it as such - there is no other
power well that we need to enable/disable atomically. We can always
rewrite the code in the future if a better idea comes up.

> 
> >  	POWER_DOMAIN_MODESET,
> >  	POWER_DOMAIN_GT_IRQ,
> >  	POWER_DOMAIN_INIT,
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> > index 30f791f89d64..164e62cb047b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> > @@ -1797,6 +1797,9 @@ bool intel_display_power_get_if_enabled(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> >  					enum intel_display_power_domain domain);
> >  void intel_display_power_put(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> >  			     enum intel_display_power_domain domain);
> > +void intel_display_power_vblank_get(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > +				    bool *needs_restore);
> 
> can we dump the needs_restore and always restore the counter?
I checked this, seems possible.

> if so, we could use regular intel_power_domain_{get,put} functions and built the generic atomic inside it.
> 
> > +void intel_display_power_vblank_put(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> >  
> >  static inline void
> >  assert_rpm_device_not_suspended(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> > index d758da6156a8..93b324dcc55d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> > @@ -56,6 +56,19 @@ static struct i915_power_well *
> >  lookup_power_well(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> >  		  enum i915_power_well_id power_well_id);
> >  
> > +/* Optimize for the case when this is called from atomic contexts,
> > + * although the case is unlikely.
> > + */
> > +#define power_well_lock(power_well, flags) do {			\
> > +	if (likely(power_well->supports_atomic_ctx))		\
> > +		spin_lock_irqsave(&power_well->lock, flags);	\
> > +	} while (0)
> > +
> > +#define power_well_unlock(power_well, flags) do {			\
> > +	if (likely(power_well->supports_atomic_ctx))			\
> > +		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&power_well->lock, flags);	\
> > +	} while (0)
> > +
> >  const char *
> >  intel_display_power_domain_str(enum intel_display_power_domain domain)
> >  {
> > @@ -126,6 +139,8 @@ intel_display_power_domain_str(enum intel_display_power_domain domain)
> >  		return "AUX_D";
> >  	case POWER_DOMAIN_GMBUS:
> >  		return "GMBUS";
> > +	case POWER_DOMAIN_VBLANK:
> > +		return "VBLANK";
> >  	case POWER_DOMAIN_INIT:
> >  		return "INIT";
> >  	case POWER_DOMAIN_MODESET:
> > @@ -141,6 +156,9 @@ intel_display_power_domain_str(enum intel_display_power_domain domain)
> >  static void intel_power_well_enable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> >  				    struct i915_power_well *power_well)
> >  {
> > +	if (power_well->supports_atomic_ctx)
> > +		assert_spin_locked(&power_well->lock);
> > +
> >  	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("enabling %s\n", power_well->name);
> >  	power_well->ops->enable(dev_priv, power_well);
> >  	power_well->hw_enabled = true;
> > @@ -149,26 +167,43 @@ static void intel_power_well_enable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> >  static void intel_power_well_disable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> >  				     struct i915_power_well *power_well)
> >  {
> > +	if (power_well->supports_atomic_ctx)
> > +		assert_spin_locked(&power_well->lock);
> > +
> >  	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("disabling %s\n", power_well->name);
> >  	power_well->hw_enabled = false;
> >  	power_well->ops->disable(dev_priv, power_well);
> >  }
> >  
> > -static void intel_power_well_get(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > +static void __intel_power_well_get(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> >  				 struct i915_power_well *power_well)
> >  {
> >  	if (!power_well->count++)
> >  		intel_power_well_enable(dev_priv, power_well);
> >  }
> >  
> > +static void intel_power_well_get(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > +				 struct i915_power_well *power_well)
> > +{
> > +	unsigned long flags = 0;
> > +
> > +	power_well_lock(power_well, flags);
> > +	__intel_power_well_get(dev_priv, power_well);
> > +	power_well_unlock(power_well, flags);
> > +}
> > +
> >  static void intel_power_well_put(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> >  				 struct i915_power_well *power_well)
> >  {
> > +	unsigned long flags = 0;
> > +
> > +	power_well_lock(power_well, flags);
> >  	WARN(!power_well->count, "Use count on power well %s is already zero",
> >  	     power_well->name);
> >  
> >  	if (!--power_well->count)
> >  		intel_power_well_disable(dev_priv, power_well);
> > +	power_well_unlock(power_well, flags);
> >  }
> >  
> >  /**
> > @@ -736,6 +771,7 @@ static void gen9_dc_off_power_well_disable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> >  		skl_enable_dc6(dev_priv);
> >  	else if (dev_priv->csr.allowed_dc_mask & DC_STATE_EN_UPTO_DC5)
> >  		gen9_enable_dc5(dev_priv);
> > +	power_well->dc_off_disabled = true;
> >  }
> >  
> >  static void i9xx_power_well_sync_hw_noop(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > @@ -1453,6 +1489,58 @@ static void chv_pipe_power_well_disable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> >  	chv_set_pipe_power_well(dev_priv, power_well, false);
> >  }
> >  
> > +void intel_display_power_vblank_get(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > +				    bool *needs_restore)
> > +{
> > +	struct i915_power_domains *power_domains  = &dev_priv->power_domains;
> > +	struct i915_power_well *power_well;
> > +	enum intel_display_power_domain domain = POWER_DOMAIN_VBLANK;
> > +
> > +	*needs_restore = false;
> > +
> > +	if (!HAS_CSR(dev_priv))
> > +		return;
> > +
> > +	if (!(HAS_PSR(dev_priv) && dev_priv->psr.sink_support))
> > +		return;
> > +
> > +	intel_runtime_pm_get_noresume(dev_priv);
> > +
> > +	for_each_power_domain_well(dev_priv, power_well, BIT_ULL(domain)) {
> > +		unsigned long flags = 0;
> > +
> > +		power_well_lock(power_well, flags);
> > +		__intel_power_well_get(dev_priv, power_well);
> > +		*needs_restore = power_well->dc_off_disabled;
> > +		power_well->dc_off_disabled = false;
> 
> it seem also that by always restoring we don't need to add this specific dc_off_disabled
> variable inside the generic pw struct.
> 
> > +		power_well_unlock(power_well, flags);
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	atomic_inc(&power_domains->domain_use_count[domain]);
> > +}
> > +
> > +void intel_display_power_vblank_put(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> > +{
> > +	struct i915_power_domains *power_domains = &dev_priv->power_domains;
> > +	struct i915_power_well *power_well;
> > +	enum intel_display_power_domain domain = POWER_DOMAIN_VBLANK;
> > +
> > +	if (!HAS_CSR(dev_priv))
> > +		return;
> > +
> > +	if (!(HAS_PSR(dev_priv) && dev_priv->psr.sink_support))
> > +		return;
> 
> Can we remove these checks and do this for any vblank domain?
> I believe this kind of association should be only on the domain<->well association
> and not check for feature here.

Do you recommend moving it up to the caller? I want to avoid acquiring
locks, updating ref counts etc, when it is not needed.

Related to your question, if my understanding is correct, the hardware
does not really enter DC5/6 without PSR when a pipe is enabled. So
instead of allowing DC5/6, we might as well disable it when there is no
PSR.


> 
> > +
> > +	WARN(atomic_dec_return(&power_domains->domain_use_count[domain]) < 0,
> > +	     "Use count on domain %s was already zero\n",
> > +	     intel_display_power_domain_str(domain));
> 
> is the atomic safe enough here? or we need a spinlock?

I believe it is safe, domain_use_count[x] does not affect any subsequent
operation. We can get away with modifying it outside the power well spin
lock.
> 
> > +
> > +	for_each_power_domain_well_rev(dev_priv, power_well, BIT_ULL(domain))
> > +		intel_power_well_put(dev_priv, power_well);
> > +
> > +	intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv);
> > +}
> > +
> >  static void
> >  __intel_display_power_get_domain(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> >  				 enum intel_display_power_domain domain)
> > @@ -1463,7 +1551,7 @@ __intel_display_power_get_domain(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> >  	for_each_power_domain_well(dev_priv, power_well, BIT_ULL(domain))
> >  		intel_power_well_get(dev_priv, power_well);
> >  
> > -	power_domains->domain_use_count[domain]++;
> > +	atomic_inc(&power_domains->domain_use_count[domain]);
> >  }
> >  
> >  /**
> > @@ -1492,6 +1580,38 @@ void intel_display_power_get(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> >  	mutex_unlock(&power_domains->lock);
> >  }
> >  
> > +static bool dc_off_get_if_enabled(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > +				  enum intel_display_power_domain domain)
> > +{
> > +	struct i915_power_well *power_well;
> > +	bool is_enabled;
> > +	unsigned long flags = 0;
> > +
> > +	power_well = lookup_power_well(dev_priv, SKL_DISP_PW_DC_OFF);
> > +	if (!power_well || !(power_well->domains & domain))
> > +		return true;
> > +
> > +	power_well_lock(power_well, flags);
> > +	is_enabled = power_well->hw_enabled;
> > +	if (is_enabled)
> > +		__intel_power_well_get(dev_priv, power_well);
> > +	power_well_unlock(power_well, flags);
> > +
> > +	return is_enabled;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void dc_off_put(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > +		       enum intel_display_power_domain domain)
> > +{
> > +	struct i915_power_well *power_well;
> > +
> > +	power_well = lookup_power_well(dev_priv, SKL_DISP_PW_DC_OFF);
> > +	if (!power_well || !(power_well->domains & domain))
> > +		return;
> > +
> > +	intel_power_well_put(dev_priv, power_well);
> > +}
> > +
> >  /**
> >   * intel_display_power_get_if_enabled - grab a reference for an enabled display power domain
> >   * @dev_priv: i915 device instance
> > @@ -1508,20 +1628,24 @@ bool intel_display_power_get_if_enabled(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> >  					enum intel_display_power_domain domain)
> >  {
> >  	struct i915_power_domains *power_domains = &dev_priv->power_domains;
> > -	bool is_enabled;
> > +	bool is_enabled = false;
> >  
> >  	if (!intel_runtime_pm_get_if_in_use(dev_priv))
> >  		return false;
> >  
> >  	mutex_lock(&power_domains->lock);
> >  
> > +	if (!dc_off_get_if_enabled(dev_priv, domain))
> > +		goto out;
> > +
> >  	if (__intel_display_power_is_enabled(dev_priv, domain)) {
> >  		__intel_display_power_get_domain(dev_priv, domain);
> >  		is_enabled = true;
> > -	} else {
> > -		is_enabled = false;
> >  	}
> >  
> > +	dc_off_put(dev_priv, domain);
> > +
> > +out:
> >  	mutex_unlock(&power_domains->lock);
> >  
> >  	if (!is_enabled)
> > @@ -1549,10 +1673,9 @@ void intel_display_power_put(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> >  
> >  	mutex_lock(&power_domains->lock);
> >  
> > -	WARN(!power_domains->domain_use_count[domain],
> > -	     "Use count on domain %s is already zero\n",
> > +	WARN(atomic_dec_return(&power_domains->domain_use_count[domain]) < 0,
> > +	     "Use count on domain %s was already zero\n",
> >  	     intel_display_power_domain_str(domain));
> > -	power_domains->domain_use_count[domain]--;
> >  
> >  	for_each_power_domain_well_rev(dev_priv, power_well, BIT_ULL(domain))
> >  		intel_power_well_put(dev_priv, power_well);
> > @@ -1720,6 +1843,7 @@ void intel_display_power_put(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> >  	BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_GT_IRQ) |			\
> >  	BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_MODESET) |			\
> >  	BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_AUX_A) |			\
> > +	BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_VBLANK) |			\
> >  	BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_INIT))
> >  
> >  #define BXT_DISPLAY_POWERWELL_2_POWER_DOMAINS (		\
> > @@ -1743,6 +1867,7 @@ void intel_display_power_put(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> >  	BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_MODESET) |			\
> >  	BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_AUX_A) |			\
> >  	BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_GMBUS) |			\
> > +	BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_VBLANK) |			\
> >  	BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_INIT))
> >  #define BXT_DPIO_CMN_A_POWER_DOMAINS (			\
> >  	BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_PORT_DDI_A_LANES) |		\
> > @@ -1803,6 +1928,7 @@ void intel_display_power_put(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> >  	BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_MODESET) |			\
> >  	BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_AUX_A) |			\
> >  	BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_GMBUS) |			\
> > +	BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_VBLANK) |			\
> >  	BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_INIT))
> >  
> >  #define CNL_DISPLAY_POWERWELL_2_POWER_DOMAINS (		\
> > @@ -1850,6 +1976,7 @@ void intel_display_power_put(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> >  	CNL_DISPLAY_POWERWELL_2_POWER_DOMAINS |		\
> >  	BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_MODESET) |			\
> >  	BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_AUX_A) |			\
> > +	BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_VBLANK) |			\
> >  	BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_INIT))
> >  
> >  static const struct i915_power_well_ops i9xx_always_on_power_well_ops = {
> > @@ -2083,9 +2210,12 @@ bool intel_display_power_well_is_enabled(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> >  {
> >  	struct i915_power_well *power_well;
> >  	bool ret;
> > +	unsigned long flags = 0;
> >  
> >  	power_well = lookup_power_well(dev_priv, power_well_id);
> > +	power_well_lock(power_well, flags);
> >  	ret = power_well->ops->is_enabled(dev_priv, power_well);
> > +	power_well_unlock(power_well, flags);
> >  
> >  	return ret;
> >  }
> > @@ -2120,6 +2250,8 @@ static struct i915_power_well skl_power_wells[] = {
> >  		.domains = SKL_DISPLAY_DC_OFF_POWER_DOMAINS,
> >  		.ops = &gen9_dc_off_power_well_ops,
> >  		.id = SKL_DISP_PW_DC_OFF,
> > +		.supports_atomic_ctx = true,
> > +		.dc_off_disabled = false,
> >  	},
> >  	{
> >  		.name = "power well 2",
> > @@ -2180,6 +2312,8 @@ static struct i915_power_well bxt_power_wells[] = {
> >  		.domains = BXT_DISPLAY_DC_OFF_POWER_DOMAINS,
> >  		.ops = &gen9_dc_off_power_well_ops,
> >  		.id = SKL_DISP_PW_DC_OFF,
> > +		.supports_atomic_ctx = true,
> > +		.dc_off_disabled = false,
> >  	},
> >  	{
> >  		.name = "power well 2",
> > @@ -2235,6 +2369,8 @@ static struct i915_power_well glk_power_wells[] = {
> >  		.domains = GLK_DISPLAY_DC_OFF_POWER_DOMAINS,
> >  		.ops = &gen9_dc_off_power_well_ops,
> >  		.id = SKL_DISP_PW_DC_OFF,
> > +		.supports_atomic_ctx = true,
> > +		.dc_off_disabled = false,
> >  	},
> >  	{
> >  		.name = "power well 2",
> > @@ -2359,6 +2495,8 @@ static struct i915_power_well cnl_power_wells[] = {
> >  		.domains = CNL_DISPLAY_DC_OFF_POWER_DOMAINS,
> >  		.ops = &gen9_dc_off_power_well_ops,
> >  		.id = SKL_DISP_PW_DC_OFF,
> > +		.supports_atomic_ctx = true,
> > +		.dc_off_disabled = false,
> >  	},
> >  	{
> >  		.name = "power well 2",
> > @@ -2487,6 +2625,7 @@ static void assert_power_well_ids_unique(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> >  int intel_power_domains_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> >  {
> >  	struct i915_power_domains *power_domains = &dev_priv->power_domains;
> > +	struct i915_power_well *power_well;
> >  
> >  	i915_modparams.disable_power_well =
> >  		sanitize_disable_power_well_option(dev_priv,
> > @@ -2524,6 +2663,10 @@ int intel_power_domains_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> >  		set_power_wells(power_domains, i9xx_always_on_power_well);
> >  	}
> >  
> > +	for_each_power_well(dev_priv, power_well)
> > +		if (power_well->supports_atomic_ctx)
> > +			spin_lock_init(&power_well->lock);
> > +
> >  	assert_power_well_ids_unique(dev_priv);
> >  
> >  	return 0;
> > @@ -2571,9 +2714,13 @@ static void intel_power_domains_sync_hw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> >  
> >  	mutex_lock(&power_domains->lock);
> >  	for_each_power_well(dev_priv, power_well) {
> > +		unsigned long flags = 0;
> > +
> > +		power_well_lock(power_well, flags);
> >  		power_well->ops->sync_hw(dev_priv, power_well);
> >  		power_well->hw_enabled = power_well->ops->is_enabled(dev_priv,
> >  								     power_well);
> > +		power_well_unlock(power_well, flags);
> >  	}
> >  	mutex_unlock(&power_domains->lock);
> >  }
> > @@ -3046,21 +3193,23 @@ void intel_power_domains_suspend(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> >  		bxt_display_core_uninit(dev_priv);
> >  }
> >  
> > -static void intel_power_domains_dump_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> > +static void intel_power_domains_dump_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > +					  const int *power_well_use)
> >  {
> >  	struct i915_power_domains *power_domains = &dev_priv->power_domains;
> >  	struct i915_power_well *power_well;
> > +	int i = 0;
> >  
> >  	for_each_power_well(dev_priv, power_well) {
> >  		enum intel_display_power_domain domain;
> >  
> >  		DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("%-25s %d\n",
> > -				 power_well->name, power_well->count);
> > +				 power_well->name, power_well_use[i++]);
> >  
> >  		for_each_power_domain(domain, power_well->domains)
> >  			DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("  %-23s %d\n",
> >  					 intel_display_power_domain_str(domain),
> > -					 power_domains->domain_use_count[domain]);
> > +					 atomic_read(&power_domains->domain_use_count[domain]));
> >  	}
> >  }
> >  
> > @@ -3079,6 +3228,7 @@ void intel_power_domains_verify_state(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> >  	struct i915_power_domains *power_domains = &dev_priv->power_domains;
> >  	struct i915_power_well *power_well;
> >  	bool dump_domain_info;
> > +	int power_well_use[dev_priv->power_domains.power_well_count];
> >  
> >  	mutex_lock(&power_domains->lock);
> >  
> > @@ -3087,6 +3237,14 @@ void intel_power_domains_verify_state(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> >  		enum intel_display_power_domain domain;
> >  		int domains_count;
> >  		bool enabled;
> > +		int well_count, i = 0;
> > +		unsigned long flags = 0;
> > +
> > +		power_well_lock(power_well, flags);
> > +		well_count = power_well->count;
> > +		enabled = power_well->ops->is_enabled(dev_priv, power_well);
> > +		power_well_unlock(power_well, flags);
> > +		power_well_use[i++] = well_count;
> >  
> >  		/*
> >  		 * Power wells not belonging to any domain (like the MISC_IO
> > @@ -3096,20 +3254,19 @@ void intel_power_domains_verify_state(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> >  		if (!power_well->domains)
> >  			continue;
> >  
> > -		enabled = power_well->ops->is_enabled(dev_priv, power_well);
> > -		if ((power_well->count || power_well->always_on) != enabled)
> > +
> > +		if ((well_count || power_well->always_on) != enabled)
> >  			DRM_ERROR("power well %s state mismatch (refcount %d/enabled %d)",
> > -				  power_well->name, power_well->count, enabled);
> > +				  power_well->name, well_count, enabled);
> >  
> >  		domains_count = 0;
> >  		for_each_power_domain(domain, power_well->domains)
> > -			domains_count += power_domains->domain_use_count[domain];
> > +			domains_count += atomic_read(&power_domains->domain_use_count[domain]);
> >  
> > -		if (power_well->count != domains_count) {
> > +		if (well_count != domains_count) {
> >  			DRM_ERROR("power well %s refcount/domain refcount mismatch "
> >  				  "(refcount %d/domains refcount %d)\n",
> > -				  power_well->name, power_well->count,
> > -				  domains_count);
> > +				  power_well->name, well_count, domains_count);
> >  			dump_domain_info = true;
> >  		}
> >  	}
> > @@ -3118,7 +3275,7 @@ void intel_power_domains_verify_state(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> >  		static bool dumped;
> >  
> >  		if (!dumped) {
> > -			intel_power_domains_dump_info(dev_priv);
> > +			intel_power_domains_dump_info(dev_priv, power_well_use);
> >  			dumped = true;
> >  		}
> >  	}
> > -- 
> > 2.11.0
> > 
> 
> I will probably have more comments later, but just doing a brain dump now
> since I end up forgetting to write yesterday...
> 
> The approach here in general is good and much better than that pre,post hooks.
> But I just believe we can do this here in a more generic approach than deviating
> the initial power well and domains.

I would have liked a generic approach (for display_power_{get,put}), but
I think this case is special enough that making it stand out is better.
 

> 
> Thanks,
> Rodrigo.
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list