[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/27] drm/i915/icl: Add initial Icelake definitions.

[Oscar Mateo]

On 01/09/2018 03:23 PM, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
>
> Icelake is a Intel® Processor containing Intel® HD Graphics.
>
> This is just an initial Icelake definition. PCI IDs, Icelake support
> and new features coming in following patches.
>
> v2: Add .ddb_size and .has_guc (Michal Wajdeczko).
> v3: Add the ICL_FEATURES macro (Kelvin Gardiner).
>
> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni at intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h          |  2 ++
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c          | 13 +++++++++++++
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c |  1 +
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h |  2 ++
>   4 files changed, 18 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index a689396d0ff6..016920f58ae6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -2595,6 +2595,7 @@ intel_info(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>   #define IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv)	IS_PLATFORM(dev_priv, INTEL_GEMINILAKE)
>   #define IS_COFFEELAKE(dev_priv)	IS_PLATFORM(dev_priv, INTEL_COFFEELAKE)
>   #define IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv)	IS_PLATFORM(dev_priv, INTEL_CANNONLAKE)
> +#define IS_ICELAKE(dev_priv)	IS_PLATFORM(dev_priv, INTEL_ICELAKE)
>   #define IS_MOBILE(dev_priv)	((dev_priv)->info.is_mobile)
>   #define IS_HSW_EARLY_SDV(dev_priv) (IS_HASWELL(dev_priv) && \
>   				    (INTEL_DEVID(dev_priv) & 0xFF00) == 0x0C00)
> @@ -2706,6 +2707,7 @@ intel_info(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>   #define IS_GEN8(dev_priv)	(!!((dev_priv)->info.gen_mask & BIT(7)))
>   #define IS_GEN9(dev_priv)	(!!((dev_priv)->info.gen_mask & BIT(8)))
>   #define IS_GEN10(dev_priv)	(!!((dev_priv)->info.gen_mask & BIT(9)))
> +#define IS_GEN11(dev_priv)	(!!((dev_priv)->info.gen_mask & BIT(10)))
>   
>   #define IS_LP(dev_priv)	(INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->is_lp)
>   #define IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv)	(IS_GEN9(dev_priv) && IS_LP(dev_priv))
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
> index 36d48422b475..88cd4a3b12f5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
> @@ -579,6 +579,19 @@ static const struct intel_device_info intel_cannonlake_gt2_info __initconst = {
>   	.gt = 2,
>   };
>   
> +#define GEN11_FEATURES \
> +	GEN10_FEATURES, \
> +	.gen = 11, \
> +	.ddb_size = 2048, \
> +	.has_csr = 0
> +
> +static const struct intel_device_info intel_icelake_11_info = {
> +	GEN11_FEATURES,
> +	.platform = INTEL_ICELAKE,
> +	.is_alpha_support = 1,
> +	.has_resource_streamer = 0,
> +};
> +

This needs to change to fit the new GEN features inheritance 
organization recently introduced by Rodrigo (with a GEN11_FEATURES and I 
guess an ICL_11_PLATFORM). Should I go ahead?

>   /*
>    * Make sure any device matches here are from most specific to most
>    * general.  For example, since the Quanta match is based on the subsystem
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
> index d28592e43512..a2c16140169f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
> @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ static const char * const platform_names[] = {
>   	PLATFORM_NAME(GEMINILAKE),
>   	PLATFORM_NAME(COFFEELAKE),
>   	PLATFORM_NAME(CANNONLAKE),
> +	PLATFORM_NAME(ICELAKE),
>   };
>   #undef PLATFORM_NAME
>   
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h
> index 49cb27bd04c1..9542018d11d0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h
> @@ -69,6 +69,8 @@ enum intel_platform {
>   	INTEL_COFFEELAKE,
>   	/* gen10 */
>   	INTEL_CANNONLAKE,
> +	/* gen11 */
> +	INTEL_ICELAKE,
>   	INTEL_MAX_PLATFORMS
>   };
>