[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/27] drm/i915/icl: Add the ICL PCI IDs

Oscar Mateo oscar.mateo at intel.com
Wed Jan 10 01:07:56 UTC 2018



On 01/09/2018 05:02 PM, De Marchi, Lucas wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-01-09 at 16:09 -0800, Oscar Mateo wrote:
>> On 01/09/2018 03:23 PM, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
>>> This is the current PCI ID list in our documentation.
>>>
>>> Let's leave the _gt#_ part out for now since our current documentation
>>> is not 100% clear and we don't need this info now anyway.
>>>
>>> v2: Use the new ICL_11 naming (Kelvin Gardiner).
>>> v3: Latest IDs as per BSpec (Oscar).
>>> v4: Make it compile (Paulo).
>>> v5: Remove comments (Lucas).
>>> v6: Multile rebases (Paulo).
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Anuj Phogat <anuj.phogat at intel.com> (v1)
>>> Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni at intel.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo at intel.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi at intel.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
>>> ---
>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c |  1 +
>>>    include/drm/i915_pciids.h       | 11 +++++++++++
>>>    2 files changed, 12 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
>>> index 88cd4a3b12f5..0a807bb44583 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
>>> @@ -651,6 +651,7 @@ static const struct pci_device_id pciidlist[] = {
>>>    	INTEL_CFL_U_GT3_IDS(&intel_coffeelake_gt3_info),
>>>    	INTEL_CNL_U_GT2_IDS(&intel_cannonlake_gt2_info),
>>>    	INTEL_CNL_Y_GT2_IDS(&intel_cannonlake_gt2_info),
>>> +	INTEL_ICL_11_IDS(&intel_icelake_11_info),
>>>    	{0, 0, 0}
>>>    };
>> And apparently the latest trend here is to add the GT info (as per a
>> patch from Lionel) which we are also not doing in ICL yet.
> With a reason... that I think is well explained in the commit message, isn't
> it?
>

Yeah, I just saw that warning in the commit message (right when I was 
wondering how to represent a GT 0.5...). Paulo: are we still happy with 
this patch as is? Also: do we want to split the table into Y & U skus 
like CNL does now?

> Lucas De Marchi
>
>>>    MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(pci, pciidlist);
>>> diff --git a/include/drm/i915_pciids.h b/include/drm/i915_pciids.h
>>> index 5db0458dd832..a967fa3838fb 100644
>>> --- a/include/drm/i915_pciids.h
>>> +++ b/include/drm/i915_pciids.h
>>> @@ -434,4 +434,15 @@
>>>    	INTEL_CNL_U_GT2_IDS(info), \
>>>    	INTEL_CNL_Y_GT2_IDS(info)
>>>    
>>> +#define INTEL_ICL_11_IDS(info) \
>>> +	INTEL_VGA_DEVICE(0x8A50, info), \
>>> +	INTEL_VGA_DEVICE(0x8A51, info), \
>>> +	INTEL_VGA_DEVICE(0x8A5C, info), \
>>> +	INTEL_VGA_DEVICE(0x8A5D, info), \
>>> +	INTEL_VGA_DEVICE(0x8A52, info), \
>>> +	INTEL_VGA_DEVICE(0x8A5A, info), \
>>> +	INTEL_VGA_DEVICE(0x8A5B, info), \
>>> +	INTEL_VGA_DEVICE(0x8A71, info), \
>>> +	INTEL_VGA_DEVICE(0x8A70, info)
>>> +
>>>    #endif /* _I915_PCIIDS_H */



More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list